mgssuvestВестник МГСУVestnik MGSU1997-09352304-6600Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)10.22227/1997-0935.2023.11.1745-1762mgssuvest-111Research ArticleПроектирование и конструирование строительных систем. Строительная механика. Основания и фундаменты, подземные сооруженияConstruction system design and layout planning. Construction mechanics. Bases and foundations, underground structuresОценка аэроупругой устойчивости шпиля башниEstimation of aeroelastic stability of a tower spireБелостоцкийА. М.BelostotskyA. M.

Александр Михайлович Белостоцкий — доктор технических наук, профессор кафедры информатики и прикладной математики, научный руководитель научно-образовательного центра компьютерного моделирования уникальных зданий, сооружений и комплексов им. А.Б. Золотова (НОЦ КМ им. А.Б. Золотова), академик РААСН

129337, г. Москва, Ярославское шоссе, д. 26

Alexander M. Belostotsky — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Informatics and Applied Mathematics, Scientific Director of the Scientific and Educational Center for Computer Modeling of Unique Buildings, Structures and Complexes named after A.B. Zolotova, Academic of Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

amb@stadyo.ruНегрозоваИ. Ю.NegrozovaI. Yu.

Ирина Юрьевна Негрозова — младший научный сотрудник научно-образовательного центра компьютерного моделирования уникальных зданий, сооружений и комплексов им. А.Б. Золотова (НОЦ КМ им. А.Б. Золотова)

129337, г. Москва, Ярославское шоссе, д. 26

Irina Yu. Negrozova — Junior Researcher of the Scientific and Educational Center for Computer Modeling of Unique Buildings, Structures and Complexes named after A.B. Zolotova

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

irina-lanzova@mail.ruГорячевскийО. С.GoryachevskyO. S.

Олег Сергеевич Горячевский — заместитель директора научно-образовательного центра компьютерного моделирования уникальных зданий, сооружений и комплексов им. А.Б. Золотова (НОЦ КМ им. А.Б. Золотова)

129337, г. Москва, Ярославское шоссе, д. 26

Oleg S. Goryachevsky — Deputy Director of the Scientific and Educational Center for Computer Modeling of Unique Buildings, Structures and Complexes named after A.B. Zolotova

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

osgoryachevskij@mail.ruНациональный исследовательский Московский государственный строительный университет (НИУ МГСУ)РоссияMoscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)Russian Federation202330112023181117451762Copyright © Белостоцкий А.М., Негрозова И.Ю., Горячевский О.С., 20232023Белостоцкий А.М., Негрозова И.Ю., Горячевский О.С.Belostotsky A.M., Negrozova I.Y., Goryachevsky O.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.vestnikmgsu.ru/jour/article/view/111Введение

Введение. Большепролетные и гибкие конструкции весьма чувствительны к воздействию ветра. Такие конструкции подвержены возникновению аэроупругих явлений. В истории известны случаи, когда в результате ветрового воздействия происходило обрушение конструкции. В связи с этим актуальной задачей является разработка методов оценки возникновения аэроупругой неустойчивости.

Материалы и методы

Материалы и методы. Динамические и жесткостные характеристики объекта, используемые при инженерной оценке возможности аэроупругих явлений, определили с помощью программного комплекса (ПК) ANSYS Mechanical. Моделирование обтекания исследуемого объекта провели в ПК ANSYS Fluent. Для подтверждения полученных оценок о невозможности возникновения аэроупругой неустойчивости по нормативной методике выполнили прямое численное моделирование двухстороннего взаимодействия шпиля и воздушного потока в ПК ANSYS (двухсторонний FSI, реализуемый связкой модулей Fluent и Mechanical).

Результаты

Результаты. С применением разработанных расчетных динамических конечно-элементных моделей установили собственные частоты и формы колебаний. Провели оценку возможности возникновения галопирования по нормативной методике для исследуемого шпиля при скоростях ветра, наблюдаемых на площадке строительства. Осуществили прямое численное моделирование связанной задачи двухстороннего взаимодействия шпиля и воздушного потока в ПК ANSYS при максимально возможной скорости ветра для места строительства для наиболее опасного направления ветра (полученного по результатам инженерной оценки).

Выводы

Выводы. Проведенная оценка о возможности возникновения аэроупругой неустойчивости по нормативной методике и поверочный двухсторонний связанный расчет аэроупругих колебаний шпиля подтвердили отсутствие явлений аэроупругой неустойчивости при максимально возможной скорости ветра для места строительства.

Introduction

Introduction. Large-span and flexible structures are very sensitive to the effects of wind. Such structures are subject to the occurrence of aeroelastic phenomena. In history there are known cases when as a result of wind impact, there was a collapse of the structure. In this regard, the development of methods for estimation of aeroelastic instability is an urgent task.

Materials and methods

Materials and methods. Dynamic and stiffness characteristics of the object, used in engineering assessment of the possibility of aeroelastic phenomena, were determined using the ANSYS Mechanical software package. Modelling of the flow around the object under study was carried out using the ANSYS Fluent software package. To confirm the obtained estimates of the impossibility of the occurrence of aeroelastic instability according to the normative method, direct numerical simulation of the two-sided interaction between the spire and the air flow was carried out in the ANSYS software (two-way FSI, implemented by a combination of Fluent and Mechanical modules).

Results

Results. Using the developed computational dynamic finite element models, natural frequencies and vibration modes are determined. An assessment of the possibility of galloping occurrence was carried out according to the normative method for the studied spire at velocity observed at the construction site. Direct numerical modelling of the coupled problem of two-sided interaction between the spire and the air flow was carried out in the ANSYS software package at the maximum possible wind speed for the construction site for the most dangerous wind direction (obtained from the results of engineering assessment).

Conclusions

Conclusions. The assessment of the possibility of aeroelastic instability according to the normative methodology and verification two-sided coupled calculation of aeroelastic oscillations of the spire confirmed the absence of aeroelastic instability phenomena at the maximum possible wind speed for the construction site.

аэроупругостьаэроупругая неустойчивостьгалопированиекритерий Ден-Гартогачисленное моделированиесвязанная задачаFSIaeroelasticityaeroelastic instabilitygallopingDen-Hartog criterionnumerical modellingcoupled problemFSIReferencesHolmes J.D. Wind loading of structures. Boca Raton : CRC press, 2018.Holmes J.D. Wind loading of structures. Boca Raton, CRC press, 2018.Davenport A.G. The Application of Statistical Concepts to the Wind Loading of Structures // Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 1961. Vol. 19. Issue 4. Pp. 449–472. DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1961.11304Davenport A.G. The application of statistical concepts to the wind loading of structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 1961; 19(4):449-472. DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1961.11304Davenport A.G. Gust Loading Factors // Journal of the Structural Division. 1967. Vol. 93. Issue 3. Pp. 11–34. DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0001692Davenport A.G. Gust loading factors. Journal of the Structural Division. 1967; 93(3):11-34. DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0001692.Барштейн М.Ф. Руководство по расчету зданий и сооружений на действие ветра. М. : Стройиздат, 1978. 216 с.Barshtein M.F. Guidelines for the calculation of buildings and structures for the action of the wind. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1978; 216. (rus.).Симиу Э., Сканлан Р. Воздействие ветра на здания и сооружения / пер. с англ. Б.Е. Маслова, А.В. Швецовой. М. : Стройиздат, 1984. 358 с.Simiu E., Scanlan R.H. Wind effects on structures: an introduction to wind engineering. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1984; 358. (rus.).Den-Hartog J.P. Transmission line vibration due to sleet // Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. 1932. Vol. 51. Issue 4. Pp. 1074–1076. DOI: 10.1109/T-AIEE.1932.5056223Den-Hartog J.P. Transmission line vibration due to sleet. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. 1932; 51(4):1074-1076. DOI: 10.1109/T-AIEE.1932.5056223Den-Hartog J.P. Mechanical Vibrations. New York : Dover Publications, 1985. 436 p.Den-Hartog J.P. Mechanical Vibrations. New York, Dover Publications, 1985; 436.Boggs D.W., Peterka J.A. Aerodynamic model tests of tall buildings // Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 1989. Vol. 115. Pp. 618–635. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:3(618)Boggs D.W., Peterka J.A. Aerodynamic model tests of tall buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 1989; 115:618-635. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:3(618)Pozzuoli C., Bartoli G., Peil U., Clobes M. Serviceability wind risk assessment of tall buildings including aeroelastic effects // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2013. Vol. 123. Issue 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.014Pozzuoli C., Bartoli G., Peil U., Clobes M. Serviceability wind risk assessment of tall buildings including aeroelastic effects. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2013; 123(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.014Dongmei H., Ledong Z., Quanshun D., Xue Z., Wei C. Aeroelastic and aerodynamic interference effects on a high-rise building // Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2017. Vol. 69. Pp. 355–381.Dongmei H., Ledong Z., Quanshun D., Xue Z., Wei C. Aeroelastic and aerodynamic interference effects on a high-rise building. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2017; 69:355-381.Wang L., Liang S., Huang G., Song J., Zou L. Investigation on the unstability of vortex induced resonance of high-rise buildings // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2018. Vol. 175. Pp. 17–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.025Wang L., Liang S., Huang G., Song J., Zou L. Investigation on the unstability of vortex induced resonance of high-rise buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2018; 175:17-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.025Zheng C., Liu Z., Wu T., Wang H., Wu Y., Shi X. Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration of a thousand-meter-scale mega-tall building // Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2019. Vol. 85. Pp. 94–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.12.005Zheng C., Liu Z., Wu T., Wang H., Wu Y., Shi X. Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration of a thousand-meter-scale mega-tall building. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2019; 85:94-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.12.005Wardlaw R.L., Moss G.F. A standard tall building model for the comparison of simulated natural winds in wind tunnels. CAARC, C.C.662m Tech. 1970.Wardlaw R.L., Moss G.F. A standard tall building model for the comparison of simulated natural winds in wind tunnels. CAARC, C.C.662m Tech. 1970.Whitbread R.E. The measurement of non-steady wind forces on small-scale building models // Proceedings of the 4th international conference on wind effects on buildings and structures. 1977. Pp. 567–574.Whitbread R.E. The measurement of non-steady wind forces on small-scale building models. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on wind effects on buildings and structures. 1977; 567-574.Blackmore P.A. A comparison of experimental methods for estimating dynamic response of buildings // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1985. Vol. 18. Pp. 197–212. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(85)90098-4Blackmore P.A. A comparison of experimental methods for estimating dynamic response of buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1985; 18:197-212. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(85)90098-4Tanaka H., Lawen N. Test on the CAARC standard tall building model with a length scale of 1:1000 // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1986. Vol. 25. Pp. 15–29. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(86)90102-9Tanaka H., Lawen N. Test on the CAARC standard tall building model with a length scale of 1:1000. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1986; 25:15-29. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(86)90102-9Goliger A.M., Milford R.V. Sensitivity of the CAARC standard building model to geometric scale and turbulence // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1988. Vol. 31. Pp. 105–123. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(88)90190-0Goliger A.M., Milford R.V. Sensitivity of the CAARC standard building model to geometric scale and turbulence. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1988; 31:105-123. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(88)90190-0Thepmongkorn S., Wood G.S., Kwok K.C.S. Interference effects on wind-induced coupled motion of a tall building // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2002. Vol. 90. Issue 12–15. Pp. 1807–1815. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00289-1Thepmongkorn S., Wood G.S., Kwok K.C.S. Interference effects on wind-induced coupled motion of a tall building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2002; 90(12-15):1807-1815. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00289-1Tang U.F., Kwok K.C.S. Interference excitation mechanisms on a 3DOF aeroelastic CAARC building model // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2004. Vol. 92. Issue 14. Pp. 1299–1314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.08.004Tang U.F., Kwok K.C.S. Interference excitation mechanisms on a 3DOF aeroelastic CAARC building model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2004; 92(14):1299-1314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.08.004Balendra T., Anwar M.P., Tey K.L. Direct measurement of wind-induced displacement in tall building models using laser positioning technique // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2005. Vol. 93. Issue 5. Pp. 399–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2005.03.003Balendra T., Anwar M.P., Tey K.L. Direct measurement of wind-induced displacement in tall building models using laser positioning technique. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2005; 93(5):399-412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2005.03.003Hanson T., Summers D.M., Wilson C.B. A three-dimensional simulation of wind flow around buildings // International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 1986. Vol. 6. Issue 3. Pp. 113–127.Hanson T., Summers D.M., Wilson C.B. A three-dimensional simulation of wind flow around buildings. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 1986; 6(3):113-127.Murakami S., Mochida A., Hibi K. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of air flow around a cubic model by means of large eddy simulation // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1987. Vol. 25. Pp. 291–305. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(87)90023-7Murakami S., Mochida A., Hibi K. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of air flow around a cubic model by means of large eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1987; 25:291-305. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(87)90023-7Murakami S. Current status and future trends in computational wind engineering // Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics. 1997. Vol. 67. Pp. 3–34.Murakami S. Current status and future trends in computational wind engineering. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997; 67:3-34.Tominaga Y., Mochida A., Murakami S., Sawaki S. Comparison of various revised k–ε models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2008. Vol. 96. Issue 4. Pp. 389–411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.01.004Tominaga Y., Mochida A., Murakami S., Sawaki S. Comparison of various revised k–ε models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2008; 96(4):389-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.01.004Blocken B., Carmeliet J., Stathopoulos T. CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings: effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2007. Vol. 95. Pp. 941–962. DOI: 10.1016/J.JWEIA.2007.01.013Blocken B., Carmeliet J., Stathopoulos T. CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings: effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2007; 95:941-962. DOI: 10.1016/J.JWEIA.2007.01.013.Montazeri H., Blocken B. CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: Validation and sensitivity analysis // Building and Environment. 2013. Vol. 60. Pp. 137–149. DOI: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2012.11.012Montazeri H., Blocken B. CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: validation and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment. 2013; 60:137-149. DOI: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2012.11.012Zheng X., Montazeri H., Blocken B. CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES // Building and Environment. 2020. Vol. 173. Pp. 106747. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106747Zheng X., Montazeri H., Blocken B. CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES. Building and Environment. 2020; 173:106747. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106747Mochida A., Murakami S., Shoji M., Ishida Y. Numerical simulation of flowfield around Texas Tech building by large eddy simulation // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1993. Vol. 46–47. Pp. 455–460. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(93)90312-CMochida A., Murakami S., Shoji M., Ishida Y. Numerical simulation of flowfield around Texas Tech building by large eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1993; 6-47:455-460. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(93)90312-CHe J., Song C.C.S. A numerical study of wind flow around the TTU building and the roof corner vortex // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997. Vol. 67–68. Pp. 547–558.He J., Song C.C.S. A numerical study of wind flow around the TTU building and the roof corner vortex. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997; 67-68:547-558.Selvam R.P. Finite element modelling of flow around a circular cylinder using LES // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997. Vol. 67–68. Pp. 129–139.Selvam R.P. Finite element modelling of flow around a circular cylinder using LES. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997; 67-68:129-139.Senthooran S., Lee D.D., Parameswaran S. A computational model to calculate the flow-induced pressure fluctuations on buildings // Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2004. Vol. 92. Issue 13. Pp. 1131–1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.002Senthooran S., Lee D.D., Parameswaran S. A computational model to calculate the flow-induced pressure fluctuations on buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2004; 92(13):1131-1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.002

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.