Optimization of process parameters and construction management systems for port facilities
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2026.6.1001-1008
Abstract
Introduction. The role of ports in supporting economic growth, global value chains, and logistics flows is undeniable. While inefficient ports slow down trade, disrupt transport flows, and increase costs, future-ready infrastructure attracts investment and supports economic development. However, port construction is costly and involves lengthy periods of planning, consultation and construction. Port operation and management also require a specialized workforce and expertise. The purpose of this paper is to examine approaches to optimizing the parameters of technological processes and systems for organizing the construction of port facilities.
Materials and methods. The study is based on systematic and synthetic approaches, including theoretical analysis of the literature, generalization of existing models and approaches to the construction of port facilities, and mathematical modeling. In addition, the work used methods of stochastic and adaptive optimization, which take into account the uncertainty of technological, logistical, and natural factors in the process of constructing port facilities.
Results. The paper proposes an intelligent adaptive model for multi-criteria optimization of organizational and technological systems for the construction of port facilities. The author’s model provides robust, adaptive, and self-learning management of port facility construction, minimizing deviations from the plan, increasing the efficiency of resource use, reducing time and risks, and integrating multi-criteria objectives in conditions of high stochasticity and limited spatial resources.
Conclusions. The model proposed in this work provides a transition from static planning of construction work to adaptive management that is resistant to actual technological deviations. The practical application of this model will allow not only to adjust the schedule, but also to accumulate verified data for updating standards and developing future practices for the construction of port facilities.
About the Authors
V. A. Murya
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vadim A. Murya — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 927045, Scopus: 59181231800, ResearcherID: AEX-9031-2022
A. Yu. Ponomarev
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexei Yu. Ponomarev — postgraduate student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
ResearcherID: PMR-2789-2026
References
1. Nikolaeva A.B. Enhancing cargo capacity along the northern sea route through harbor infrastructure development. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka. 2023; 26(3)(81):140-149. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.3.2023.81.009. EDN CUHUBA. (rus.).
2. Voronina E.P. The main directions of sustainable functioning and priorities for the development of the northern sea route as a competitive national transport communication. Arctic 2035: Current Issues, Challenges, Solutions. 2023; 4(16):39-50. DOI: 10.51823/74670_2023_4_39. EDN EGKZGQ. (rus.).
3. Lin W., Liu W. Resilience Evaluation of Ports along the Maritime Silk Road from the Perspective of Investment and Construction. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2023; 2023:1-18. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8818667. EDN JFKXRI.
4. Ren Q. Comparison and Cost Analysis of Soft Soil Foundation Treatment Schemes in Port Construction. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2022; 2022(1). EDN LQPVFR.
5. Andreeva L., Kuznetsov A., Sampiev A., Semenov A. Tasks of improving methods of technological design of trade sea ports in new conditions. Transport business of Russia. 2024; 1:164-166. EDN CERHHD. (rus.).
6. Fomin M.A., Zolotareva M.V. Port infrastructure conversion in New York city as an example. Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2025; 27(1):70-81. DOI: 10.31675/1607-1859-2025-27-1-70-81. EDN DYDMPF. (rus.).
7. Pian F., Shi Q., Yao X., Zhu H., Luan W. Joint Optimization of a Dry Port with Multilevel Location and Container Transportation: The Case of Northeast China. Complexity. 2021; 2021(1). DOI: 10.1155/2021/5584600. EDN EDQLFD.
8. Wen L., Ren Q., Li J. Hainan Port Logistics Supply Chain and Its Flexible Operation Mechanism considering Digital Visual Remote Control. Mobile Information Systems. 2022; 2022:1-12. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4642103. EDN MUJBBC.
9. Zykova A.A., Kirichenko A.V., Hetman V.E. The impact of the development of the northern sea route on the port infrastructure of Russia. Actual Problems of Economics and Management. 2022; 1(11):125-130. DOI: 10.52899/978-5-88303-644-5_125. EDN AZFXDH. (rus.).
10. Alekseeva A.A., Krylov A.A., Panasyuk V.A., Abramov V.M. Problems and prospects of port infrastructure development. Information technologies and systems: management, economics, transport. 2022; 3(43):69-76. EDN FIKDRP. (rus.).
11. Grinko N.A., Korinets E.M. Features of the application of geoinformation systems in the development of port infrastructure. Information technologies and systems: management, economics, transport, law. 2022; S2:25-27. EDN YLOIXC. (rus.).
12. Zhou S., Guo X., Cao S. Enhanced Energy Sharing and Management Between Cross-Harbour Zero-Emission Buildings Based on a Combination of Electric Ferries and Deck-on Electric Vehicles with Grid Integrations. International Journal of Energy Research. 2025; 2025(1). DOI: 10.1155/er/9606817. EDN UHPQXJ.
13. Maphumulo M.N., Masuku M.M. The State of Infrastructure in the Proclaimed Small Harbours in Enhancing Livelihoods in South Africa. Journal of International Development. 2025; 37(2):457-467. DOI: 10.1002/jid.3968. EDN CXQHLW.
14. Elnabwy M.T., Elbeltagi E., El Banna M.M., Alshahri A.H., Hu J.W., Choi B.G. et al. Harbor Sedimentation Management Using Numerical Modeling and Exploratory Data Analysis. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2024; 2024(1). DOI: 10.1155/2024/1209460. EDN BEFFTT.
15. Almeida F., Okon E. Achieving sustainable development goals through digitalization in ports. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2024; 33(7):6737-6747. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3842. EDN VYMPQA.
16. Kochurova A.A. Ways to relieve the "bottlenecks" of the port infrastructure arctic coast of Russia. Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2022; 11(148):527-529. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2022.148.11.099. EDN ISKTYU. (rus.).
17. Koval V.N., Protsevskiy V.A., Morozova A.N. Peculiarities of legal regulation of private interests in the process of functioning of port infrastructure. The Rule of Law. 2023; 3(55):35-48. EDN ZRZXRT. (rus.).
18. Jashhenko A.I., Belyj A.A. Application of an automated deformation monitoring system to ensure the safe operation of port and transport infrastructure facilities. Road Navigator. 2024; 59(85):58-65. EDN ZOSAOM. (rus.).
19. Gonçalves A., de Aguiar Dutra A.R., de Andrade Guerra J.B.S.O., Dutra A. Ports and Climate Change: A Systematic Review Aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development. 2025; 34(S2):390-402. DOI: 10.1002/sd.70352. EDN RNXXTV.
20. Yuan Y., Sui Z. Application status and developing trend of emerging technologies in smart port. China Water Transport. 2022; 3:60-62.
Review
For citations:
Murya V.A., Ponomarev A.Yu. Optimization of process parameters and construction management systems for port facilities. Vestnik MGSU. 2026;21(6):1001-1008. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2026.6.1001-1008
Views:
42
JATS XML
Email this article 
