Estimation of aeroelastic stability of a tower spire
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.11.1745-1762
Abstract
Introduction. Large-span and flexible structures are very sensitive to the effects of wind. Such structures are subject to the occurrence of aeroelastic phenomena. In history there are known cases when as a result of wind impact, there was a collapse of the structure. In this regard, the development of methods for estimation of aeroelastic instability is an urgent task.
Materials and methods. Dynamic and stiffness characteristics of the object, used in engineering assessment of the possibility of aeroelastic phenomena, were determined using the ANSYS Mechanical software package. Modelling of the flow around the object under study was carried out using the ANSYS Fluent software package. To confirm the obtained estimates of the impossibility of the occurrence of aeroelastic instability according to the normative method, direct numerical simulation of the two-sided interaction between the spire and the air flow was carried out in the ANSYS software (two-way FSI, implemented by a combination of Fluent and Mechanical modules).
Results. Using the developed computational dynamic finite element models, natural frequencies and vibration modes are determined. An assessment of the possibility of galloping occurrence was carried out according to the normative method for the studied spire at velocity observed at the construction site. Direct numerical modelling of the coupled problem of two-sided interaction between the spire and the air flow was carried out in the ANSYS software package at the maximum possible wind speed for the construction site for the most dangerous wind direction (obtained from the results of engineering assessment).
Conclusions. The assessment of the possibility of aeroelastic instability according to the normative methodology and verification two-sided coupled calculation of aeroelastic oscillations of the spire confirmed the absence of aeroelastic instability phenomena at the maximum possible wind speed for the construction site.
About the Authors
A. M. Belostotsky
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Belostotsky — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Informatics and Applied Mathematics, Scientific Director of the Scientific and Educational Center for Computer Modeling of Unique Buildings, Structures and Complexes named after A.B. Zolotova, Academic of Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
I. Yu. Negrozova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina Yu. Negrozova — Junior Researcher of the Scientific and Educational Center for Computer Modeling of Unique Buildings, Structures and Complexes named after A.B. Zolotova
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
O. S. Goryachevsky
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg S. Goryachevsky — Deputy Director of the Scientific and Educational Center for Computer Modeling of Unique Buildings, Structures and Complexes named after A.B. Zolotova
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Holmes J.D. Wind loading of structures. Boca Raton, CRC press, 2018.
2. Davenport A.G. The application of statistical concepts to the wind loading of structures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 1961; 19(4):449-472. DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1961.11304
3. Davenport A.G. Gust loading factors. Journal of the Structural Division. 1967; 93(3):11-34. DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0001692.
4. Barshtein M.F. Guidelines for the calculation of buildings and structures for the action of the wind. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1978; 216. (rus.).
5. Simiu E., Scanlan R.H. Wind effects on structures: an introduction to wind engineering. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1984; 358. (rus.).
6. Den-Hartog J.P. Transmission line vibration due to sleet. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. 1932; 51(4):1074-1076. DOI: 10.1109/T-AIEE.1932.5056223
7. Den-Hartog J.P. Mechanical Vibrations. New York, Dover Publications, 1985; 436.
8. Boggs D.W., Peterka J.A. Aerodynamic model tests of tall buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 1989; 115:618-635. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:3(618)
9. Pozzuoli C., Bartoli G., Peil U., Clobes M. Serviceability wind risk assessment of tall buildings including aeroelastic effects. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2013; 123(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.014
10. Dongmei H., Ledong Z., Quanshun D., Xue Z., Wei C. Aeroelastic and aerodynamic interference effects on a high-rise building. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2017; 69:355-381.
11. Wang L., Liang S., Huang G., Song J., Zou L. Investigation on the unstability of vortex induced resonance of high-rise buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2018; 175:17-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.025
12. Zheng C., Liu Z., Wu T., Wang H., Wu Y., Shi X. Experimental investigation of vortex-induced vibration of a thousand-meter-scale mega-tall building. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2019; 85:94-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.12.005
13. Wardlaw R.L., Moss G.F. A standard tall building model for the comparison of simulated natural winds in wind tunnels. CAARC, C.C.662m Tech. 1970.
14. Whitbread R.E. The measurement of non-steady wind forces on small-scale building models. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on wind effects on buildings and structures. 1977; 567-574.
15. Blackmore P.A. A comparison of experimental methods for estimating dynamic response of buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1985; 18:197-212. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(85)90098-4
16. Tanaka H., Lawen N. Test on the CAARC standard tall building model with a length scale of 1:1000. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1986; 25:15-29. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(86)90102-9
17. Goliger A.M., Milford R.V. Sensitivity of the CAARC standard building model to geometric scale and turbulence. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1988; 31:105-123. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(88)90190-0
18. Thepmongkorn S., Wood G.S., Kwok K.C.S. Interference effects on wind-induced coupled motion of a tall building. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2002; 90(12-15):1807-1815. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00289-1
19. Tang U.F., Kwok K.C.S. Interference excitation mechanisms on a 3DOF aeroelastic CAARC building model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2004; 92(14):1299-1314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.08.004
20. Balendra T., Anwar M.P., Tey K.L. Direct measurement of wind-induced displacement in tall building models using laser positioning technique. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2005; 93(5):399-412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2005.03.003
21. Hanson T., Summers D.M., Wilson C.B. A three-dimensional simulation of wind flow around buildings. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 1986; 6(3):113-127.
22. Murakami S., Mochida A., Hibi K. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of air flow around a cubic model by means of large eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1987; 25:291-305. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(87)90023-7
23. Murakami S. Current status and future trends in computational wind engineering. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997; 67:3-34.
24. Tominaga Y., Mochida A., Murakami S., Sawaki S. Comparison of various revised k–ε models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2008; 96(4):389-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.01.004
25. Blocken B., Carmeliet J., Stathopoulos T. CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings: effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2007; 95:941-962. DOI: 10.1016/J.JWEIA.2007.01.013.
26. Montazeri H., Blocken B. CFD simulation of wind-induced pressure coefficients on buildings with and without balconies: validation and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment. 2013; 60:137-149. DOI: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2012.11.012
27. Zheng X., Montazeri H., Blocken B. CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES. Building and Environment. 2020; 173:106747. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106747
28. Mochida A., Murakami S., Shoji M., Ishida Y. Numerical simulation of flowfield around Texas Tech building by large eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1993; 6-47:455-460. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(93)90312-C
29. He J., Song C.C.S. A numerical study of wind flow around the TTU building and the roof corner vortex. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997; 67-68:547-558.
30. Selvam R.P. Finite element modelling of flow around a circular cylinder using LES. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1997; 67-68:129-139.
31. Senthooran S., Lee D.D., Parameswaran S. A computational model to calculate the flow-induced pressure fluctuations on buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2004; 92(13):1131-1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.002
Review
For citations:
Belostotsky A.M., Negrozova I.Yu., Goryachevsky O.S. Estimation of aeroelastic stability of a tower spire. Vestnik MGSU. 2023;18(11):1745-1762. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.11.1745-1762
Views:
282
Email this article 