Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Distribution of transaction costs in the investment and construction sector of the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.11.1821-1835

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of the analysis of transaction costs is associated with a significant share of the transaction sector in the gross domestic product (GDP) of the national economy, a change in which can be associated with both
the efficiency and inefficiency of the built institutional environment. The purpose of the study is to develop recommendations for influencing the elements of the institutional environment to optimize administrative barriers typical for the investment and construction sector (ICS) of the Russian Federation. The novelty of the author’s approach is formed by considering
the aspect of distribution of transaction costs under the influence of heterogeneous contracts between the participants of the ICS.

Materials and methods. The data of Rosstat on the structure of the gross domestic product of the Russian Federation are used, the results of international studies on quantitative and qualitative assessment of transaction costs in construction are analyzed. The study was based on the tools of institutional theories, as well as general scientific methods.

Results. Distributors of transaction costs in the investment and construction sector of the Russian Federation are revealed: customer predictability, institutional rent of the contractor, institutional rent of the developer, completeness of relational contracts to ensure customer predictability, information on the profitability of bypassing formal rules by subjects of
the investment and construction sector, digitalization.

Conclusions. The description of transaction costs through the aspect of their distribution allows to formalize a model of their quantitative or qualitative measurement, taking into account the impact of the institutional environment in the Russian Federation.

About the Authors

R. R. Kozakov
St. Petersburg State University of Economics (SPbSUE)
Russian Federation

Roman R. Kozakov — master’s student

letter A 30-32 emb. Griboedov Canal, St. Petersburg, 191023

ID RSCI: 1186538



V. A. Koshcheev
St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU)
Russian Federation

Vadim A. Koshcheev — Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Economics of Construction and Housing and Communal Services, Deputy Dean for Research

4, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya st., St. Petersburg, 190005

ID RSCI: 355073, Scopus: 57212885664



References

1. Sukharev O.S. Structural and technological dynamics of the Russian economy. Moscow, Institute of Economics RAS, 2020; 53. (rus.).

2. Vladimirova I.L., Zemskov P.I. Cost management methodology for investment and construction projects based on transaction costs. Innovation and Investment. 2017; 2:12-15. EDN ZUKGQV. (rus.).

3. Vladimirova I.L., Zemskov P.I. Considering institutional factors in project construction management. Materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 110th anniversary of the Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov. 2017; 21-26. EDN YMTRBL. (rus.).

4. Zemskov P.I. Management of the cost of an investment and construction project, taking into account institutional factors : dis. ... PhD in Economics. Moscow, 2017; 203. (rus.).

5. Anastasia K., Shastitiko A. Measuring the transaction sector: opportunities, constrains, results. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2014; 6(3):(13):25-48. EDN TZKYJH. (rus.).

6. Makarov D.A., Yudenko M.N. The impact of institutional equilibrium on business development. Modern Management: Problems and Prospects : XV International scientific-practical conference. 2021; 214-218. EDN IGSSNI. (rus.).

7. Buzyrev V.V., Kashina E.V. Optimization of transactional expenses on the basis of the construction business value indicator. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2012; 6(35):163-170. EDN QZATZT. (rus.).

8. Shatalkin I.A. Transaction costs of the firm: impact of information technologies : dis. ... candidate of economic sciences. St. Petersburg, 2014; 191. (rus.).

9. Polovnikova N.A., Yudenko M.N. Transaction costs in the activities of economic entities in construction. Construction Economics. 2012; 1(13):32-36. EDN OPHIMX. (rus.).

10. Polovnikova N.A. The role of transactional costs in the interaction of participants in investment and construction complex. Problems of the modern economy. 2012; 4(44):288-291. EDN PZHBSD. (rus.).

11. Berezin A.E., Gorodnova N.V., Mashnov M.A., Sozonov E.P. Institutional approach: methodology for assessing transaction costs. International Scientific and Practical Conference World Science. 2016; 4(8):4-8. EDN WHXSAT. (rus.).

12. Hosseinian S.M., Tavakoli M. Markets, hierarchies, or hybrids as alternative governance structures in construction contracts: Transaction cost economics analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2023; 149(1). DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002426

13. Abdul-Aziz A.-R. Applications of mainstream economic theories to the construction industry: transaction costs. Research Companion to Construction Economics. 2022; 178-198. DOI: 10.4337/9781839108235.00016

14. Lukichev M.Yu. Managing transaction costs of construction corporations : dis. ... candidate of economic sciences. Moscow, 2011; 100-130. (rus.).

15. Zainuddin F.K., Mustapa F.D., Misnan S.H. Transaction cost economics for housing development: systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation and Industrial Revolution. 2022; 4(12):16-23. DOI: 10.35631/ijirev.412002

16. Li H., Arditi D., Wang Z. Factors that affect transaction costs in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2013; 139(1):60-68. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000573

17. Li H., Arditi D., Wang Z. Determinants of transaction costs in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2015; 21(5):548-558. DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2014.897973

18. Li H., Zhang C. A comparative study between China and USA on the influencing path of transaction costs in construction projects. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction. 2016; 3(1). DOI: 10.14455/ISEC.res.2016.30

19. Polterovich V.M. Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership — collaborative advantage. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022; 15(3):42-47. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2. EDN IQHEVI. (rus.).

20. Li H., Arditi D., Wang Z. Transaction costs incurred by construction owners. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2014; 21(4):444-458. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-07-2013-0064

21. Li H., Arditi D., Wang Z. Transaction-related issues and construction project performance. Construction Management and Economics. 2012; 30(2):151-164. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2012.655254

22. Atanasov V.A., Greenwood D.J., Ross H., Sanchez D.E. Forensic delay analysis as evidence of transaction costs in construction projects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 1101(5):052009. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/5/052009

23. Zainuddin F.K., Mustapa F.D., Mustapa M. Debunking the unaffordable houses in Malaysia from the transaction cost economics perspectives: A preliminary study. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business (IJAFB). 2022; 7(39):106-114. DOI: 10.55573/IJAFB.073911

24. Ramesh S., Shahzad W., Sutrisna M. Transaction Cost of Offsite Construction (OSC): A New Zealand Study. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 1101(4):042044. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1101/4/042044

25. Yudenko M.N., Yudenko E.A. The impact of transaction costs on the efficiency of construction organizations. Bulletin of the Faculty of Management of St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2017; 2:67-75. EDN YLJIKO. (rus.).

26. Yudenko M.N., Il’ina A.A. Evaluation of approaches to the classification of transaction costs in the investment and construction complex. Construction Economics. 2013; 1(19):24-28. (rus.).

27. Iudenko M.N. Institutional aspects of entrepreneurial activity in the construction sector. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series: Economy and Management. 2021; 1(49):5-15. DOI: 10.25686/2306-2800.2021.1.5. EDN YQRRLS. (rus.).

28. Alekseev A.A., Beliaeva E.Yu. About transaction costs in the investment-construction complex. Issues of Economics and Law. 2018; 119:102-110. EDN YABACD. (rus.).

29. Gorodnova N.V. Development of a center for the accounting transaction costs of the enterprise. Economics, statistics and informatics. Bulletin of the educational-methodical association. 2015; 3:47-50. EDN TWUSUZ. (rus.).

30. Haaskjold H., Andersen B., Langlo J.A. Dissecting the project anatomy: Understanding the cost of managing construction projects. Production Planning & Control. 2023; 34(2):117-138. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2021.1891480

31. Asaul A.N., Ivanov S.N. Reducing transaction costs in construction due to optimization of the information space. St. Petersburg, ANO IPEV, 2008; 6-200. EDN TXOMOC. (rus.).

32. Buzyrev V.V., Yudenko M.N. The role of specific assets in transaction costs decrease in construction. Bulletin of Baikal State University. 2009; 3:45-49. EDN KHQOEN. (rus.).

33. Blokhin A.A., Sternik S.G. Institutional rent as a non-market mechanism of economic growth. Scientific works: Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019; 17:7-26. DOI: 10.29003/m808.sp_ief_ras2019/7-26. EDN AVEJKW. (rus.).

34. Corsi S., Feranita F., De Massis A. International R&D partnerships: The role of government funding in reducing transaction costs and opportunistic behavior. R&D Management. 2021; 52(3):530-547. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12497

35. Shepilova N.P. The role of transaction costs in corporate project management. Journal of Corporate Fi nance Research. 2016; 10(1):88-101. DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.10.1.2016.88-101. (rus.).

36. Wu H., Qian Q.K., Straub A., Visscher H.J. Factors influencing transaction costs of prefabricated housing projects in China: developers’ perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2022; 29(1):476-501. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-0506

37. Yudenko M.N., Goncharova M.S. Assessment of the impact of social institutions on efficiency of build organizations business activity. Microeconomics. 2018; 5:71-77. EDN YMVOKL. (rus.).

38. Blokhin A.A., Sternik S.G., Teleshev G.V. Transformation of the institutional rent of developers of multi-family housing into institutional rent of credit organizations. Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2019; 1(208):6-17. DOI: 10.24411/2072-4098-2019-10101. EDN YTOFZJ. (rus.).

39. Marichev S. Analysis of innovations-to-economy transfer transaction costs in terms of patent law in Russia. Artificial Societies. 2019; 14(4):14. DOI: 10.18254/S207751800007732-4. EDN WJTAWT. (rus.).

40. Sama H., Ndunguru P., Nsimbila P. Transaction costs and competitive tendering in public procurement: Moderating role of integrity. African Journal of Business Management. 2022; 16(6):130-146. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM2021.9235

41. Gorodnova N.V. Transactional analysis and cost evaluation of integrated structures with state participation as a way of monitoring their efficiency. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2010; 28(193):12-17. EDN MUAYXP. (rus.).

42. Gorodnova N.V. Reducing transaction costs in the digital economy. Creative Economy. 2022; 16(6):2073-2092. DOI: 10.18334/ce.16.6.114818. EDN KUTUDF. (rus.).

43. Kozyrev A.N. Digitalization, mathematical methods and the systemic crisis of economic science. Digital Economy. 2019; 4(8):5-20. DOI: 10.34706/DE-2019-04-01. EDN NVWAEA. (rus.).

44. Veretennikova A.Yu., Kozinskaya K.M. Modeling the impact of the institutional environment on the development of digital platforms and the sharing economy. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022; 15(5):257-273. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.14. EDN EKOUUT. (rus.).


Review

For citations:


Kozakov R.R., Koshcheev V.A. Distribution of transaction costs in the investment and construction sector of the Russian Federation. Vestnik MGSU. 2023;18(11):1821-1835. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.11.1821-1835

Views: 275


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)