Interaction of production areas of settlements with regional settlement systems at the municipal level of territorial planning

Introduction. In modern urban planning of the Russian Federation, planning of development of municipalities in the established settlement systems has not become a priority strategic task. To date, the importance of these components of settlement systems is underestimated in the documentation of territorial planning of the settlement level, the dependence of the dynamics of the observed changes on the functional profile of the territories is not revealed, and the assessment of objects is dominated by the ascertaining rather than predictive approach. However, the planning of the territory of this level is able to reduce the acuteness of contradictions between short-term and long-term prospects of regional development, as well as to ensure the accuracy of linking the formed objects of different sizes with non-typical functional programs.

Materials and methods. The methodological basis was provided by general scientific methods (system approach, system-structural analysis, comparative analysis, theoretical modelling) and special interdisciplinary methods (methods of graph-analytical modelling), scientific literature, data from official sites of statistical bodies and municipalities, open cartographic sources, urban planning documents of territorial planning.

Results. For the first time the systematization of planning situations of settlements, which differ from the known examples by implementation of projects of development of territories of special economic zones of industrial type of federal and regional importance was carried out. The system of assessment of settlement territories based on the principles of structuring and allocation of planning units of municipal settlement systems, i.e. settlements, has been developed and applied. The assessment allows determining qualitative and quantitative characteristics of settlements in the aggregate, which increases the validity of location and subsequent formation of objects.

Conclusions. The increment of scientific results consists in the improvement of the methodology of territorial planning of the municipal level. It is conditioned by the strengthening of the semantic importance of the settlement link in regional settlement systems. In this connection the technologies used for the development of urban planning solutions are being adjusted and the range of tasks solved by them is expanding. They are substantiated by the results of application of the system of settlement structures assessment with allocation of planning elements of the lower level of settlement, which provides comparability and typological ranking of the studied planning situations.

1. Akhmedova E.A. Methods of urban planning regulation of the regional habitat: urban monitoring, land assessment, development forecast : dissertation abstract … Doctor of Arts. St. Petersburg, 1994; 71. (rus.).

2. Bolshakov A.G., Skryabin P.V. Urban development of the near-Olkhon territory: problems, principles and methods. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2020; 10(1):140-151. DOI: 10.21285/2227-2917-2020-1-140-151 (rus).

3. Ilyichev V.А., Kolchunov V.I., Bakaeva N.V. Principles of area development strategic planning (the case of the free state of Bavaria). Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2019; 14(2):158-168. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2019.2.158-168 (rus.).

4. Karakova T.V. Methods of structural reorganization of urban systems: migration aspect : dissertation abstract … Doctor of Architecture. Samara, 2004; 47. (rus.).

5. Yushkova N.G. The potential of the spatial system of the region in determining the innovative strategy for the development of the territory (on the example of the Volgograd region). Regions of Russia: strategies and mechanisms for modernization, innovative and technological development : Proceedings of the Eighth International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2012; 400-405. (rus.).

6. Yushkova N.G., Dontsov D.G. A concept of system regulation and a methodology of reorganizing territorial systems. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2020; 10(3):486-503. DOI: 10.21285/2227-2917-2020-3-486-503 EDN VGQVPM (rus.).

7. Dontsov D.G., Yushkova N.G., Gushchina E.G. A new spatial strategy approach in Russian regions: from the reflexing planning solutions to territorial integration conception. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018; 463:032055. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/463/3/032055

8. Babkin A.V., Bukhvald E.M. Strategic planning issues at the regional and municipal level management of the Russian Federation. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2015; 4(223):25-37. DOI: 10.5862/JE.223.2 EDN UGWKFV. (rus.).

9. Antipova E.A., Fakeyeva L.V. Settlement system of Belarus. Spatial and temporal trends at the end of 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning. 2012; 3(2):129-139.

10. Kabanov V.N., Mikhaylova E.V. Perspectives of spatial and strategic development of rural municipal districts of Russia. Bulletin of the APK of Stavropol. 2015; 4(20):318-328. (rus.).

11. Alekseev Y.V. Improving the educational system and scientific-design activity on the basis of methodology of spatial organization of settlements. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2016; 4:23-29. EDN VWRBZN. (rus.).

12. Merzlov A.V., Sadykov M.R., Chaika V.P., Ovchintseva L.A., Popova O.A. Introduction to the sustainable development of rural areas: the most important concepts and theoretical foundations. Мoscow, 2012; 57. (rus.).

13. Pavlov A.Yu. Typology of rural areas in terms of the level and sustainability of socio-economic development. International Agricultural Journal. 2019; 62(4):38. DOI: 10.24411/2588-0209-2019-10113 EDN ZXSFFR. (rus.).

14. Alekseev Yu., Perekopskaya M. Approach to the assessment of territories with a developed forestry complex (on the example of the Arkhangelsk region). Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2020; 2:62-71. DOI: 10.34031/2071-7318-2020-5-2-62-71 EDN WDGOSY. (rus.).

15. Zubarevich N.V. Transformation of rural settlement pattern and service network in rural areas. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2013; (3):26-38. DOI: 10.15356/0373-2444-2013-3-26-38 (rus.).

16. Danilina N.V., Harder R. “Mobility game”: Interactive technology for urban planning education. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 775(1):012009. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/775/1/012009

17. Danilina N.V., Privezentseva S.V. Smart space solutions of pedestrian ways in public transport transit hubs. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 775(1):012008. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/775/1/012008

18. Telichenko V.I., Shcherbina E.V. Social-natural-technogenic system of sustainable environment of vital activity. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2019; 6:5-12. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2019.06.5-12 EDN KUKAGX (rus.).

19. Shcherbina E., Gorbenkova E. Factors influencing the rural settlement development. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019; 52(25):231-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.478

20. Shubenkov M., Shubenkova M. Towards to the question of searching a balanced coexistence of natural and urbanized territories. Biospheric compatibility: man, region, technologies. 2019; 3(27):3-16. DOI: 10.21869/23-11-1518-2019-27-3-3-16 EDN NDVORI. (rus).

21. Ptichnikova G.A. Sustainable development of cities on the principles of the biosphere compatibility. Innovative Project. 2016; 1(4):112-116. DOI: 10.17673/IP.2016.1.04.13 (rus).

22. Shcherbina E., Gorbenkova E. Modern approaches of urban development design of rural settlements and small cities. Biospheric compatibility: man, region, technology. 2018; 4(24):105-116 EDN VYBIKR. (rus).

23. Perekopskaya М.A., Alekseev Yu.V. Management of territories that accommodate advanced timber industry enterprises (as illustrated by Sweden and Russia). Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2020; 15(9):1228-1238. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2020.9.1228-1238 (rus.).

24. Yenin A.E., Liventceva A.V. System approach in urban planning. History. General foundations. Objects of system researches. Russian Journal of Building Construction and Architecture. 2017; 1(33):91-101. EDN YPPHWL.

25. Yushkova N.G., Gushchina E.G., Dontsov D.G., Fikhtner O.A. Spatial development dichotomy: assessment of the potential and implementation of territorial systems. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2019. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.05.97

26. Perekopskaia M.A., Alekseev Y.V. Planning of settlements in timber-producing areas (on the example of the Arkhangelsk region). Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2021; 16(9):1124-1135. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2021.9.1124-1135 (rus.).

27. Shubenkov M.V., Mityagin S.D., Gaevskaya Z.A. The sixth technological revolution in construction industry: Noospheric paths. Advances in Energy and Environment Research. 2017; 129-134. DOI: 10.1201/9781315212876-27

28. Yudina M.A. Industry 4.0: Prospects and Challenges for Society. Public Administration. Electronic messenger. 2017; 60:197-215. (rus.).

29. Kitaygorodskiy M.D. Industry 4.0 and its impact on technological education. Modern High Technologies. 2018; 11-2:290-294. EDN YVMCZV. (rus.).

30. Yushkova N.G., Gushchina E.G., Gaponenko Yu.V., Dontsov D.G., Gushchin M.S. Infrastructural priorities and regularities of spatial development of regional systems. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS: CIEDR 2018. 2019; 474-483. EDN HAXGZR.