Measures of state support for the implementation of information modelling technologies in Russia
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.12.2015-2024
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the current preparation of the construction industry in Russia for the introduction of a mandatory requirement for the use of building information modelling (BIM) when working with objects financed from the budget. Such a requirement was supposed to come into force in 2022, but due to a number of circumstances, it was postponed. The article presents the results of the study, the purpose of which was to identify the opinions of representatives of the investment and construction sector on the main directions of state support of BIM implementation with the determination of the relationship between the opinions of respondents and the type of activity of their organizations. The results of the study will help to concentrate efforts on those that the industry needs the most. Identification of the respondents’ opinion in the context of the type of activity of their organizations will provide an opportunity for targeted application of state support measures in relation to those types of organizations that need them most urgently.
Materials and methods. Primary data for the study were collected by survey (questionnaire) and processed using the factor analysis method. At the same time, the type of activity of their organizations was chosen as a factor potentially influencing the opinion of respondents.
Results. The results of the analysis of respondents’ assessment of the effectiveness of measures of state regulation of the BIM implementation in general for the entire sample are presented. Based on the division of respondents into groups by type of activity, a factor analysis to assess the effectiveness of measures of state regulation of the BIM implementation was carried out. An assessment of the most significant state support measures in our days for the BIM implementation was made The analysis was carried out both for the sample as a whole and for groups of respondents. The analysis revealed that different groups of respondents prefer different support measures.
Conclusions. It was found that the type of activity of the respondent’s organization has a significant impact on their opinion on the effectiveness of the state policy measures implemented by the time of the survey, as well as on the most timely and necessary measures that need to be implemented at present.
About the Author
T. N. Kisel
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana N. Kisel — Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Innovations
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
ID RSCI: 655408, Scopus: 56184206400, ResearcherID: R-1538-201
References
1. Kozlov I. Estimation of economic efficiency of the building information modeling introduction. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2010; 1(10):6. EDN KZTKWX. (rus.).
2. Abakumov R.G., Naumov A.E., Zobova A.G. Benefits, tools and efficiency of information modeling technologies implementation in construction. Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2017; 5:171-181. DOI: 10.12737/article_590878fb8be5f0.72456616. EDN YNBNWB. (rus.).
3. Musonda I. The strategic application of Building Information Modelling (BIM) to the role of construction project management. Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019. 2019. DOI: 10.3311/ ccc2019-065
4. Razali M.F., Haron N.A., Hassim S., Alias A.H., Harun A.N., Abubakar A.S. A review: Application of Building Information Modelling (BIM) over building life cycles. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019; 357(1):012028. DOI: 10.1088/ 1755-1315/357/1/012028
5. Talapov V. BIM: what is usually understood by this. Second Edition. 2014. (rus.).
6. Lu W., Fung A., Peng Yi., Liang C., Rowlinson S. Cost-benefit analysis of Building Information Modeling implementation in building projects through demystification of time-effort distribution curves. Building and Environment. 2014; 82:317-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.08.030
7. Sholeh M., Fauziyah S., Khasani R. Effect of Building Information Modeling (BIM) on reduced construction time-costs: a case study. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020; 202:02012. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020202012
8. Shin M., Lee H., Kim H. Benefit–cost analysis of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in a railway site. Sustainability. 2018; 10(11):4303. DOI: 10.4303.10.3390/su10114303
9. Kaneta T., Furusaka S., Tamura A., Deng N. Overview of BIM implementation in Singapore and Japan. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2016; 10(12). DOI: 10.17265/1934-7359/2016.12.001.
10. Liao L., Teo E., Chang R., Zhao X. Diffusion of Building Information Modeling in building projects and firms in Singapore. Sustainability. 2020; 12(18):7762. DOI: 10.3390/su12187762.
11. Liao L., Teo E. Critical success factors for enhancing the Building Information Modelling implementation in building projects in Singapore. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2017; 23(8):1029-1044. DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1374300
12. Nassereddine H., Hatoum M.B., Hanna A.S. Overview of the state-of-practice of BIM in the AEC industry in the United States. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC). 2022. DOI: 10.22260/ISARC2022/0074
13. Ojo A., Pye C. BIM implementation practices of construction organisations in the UK AEC industry. Project Management Journal. 2020.
14. Vol`f I. BIM in the world is commonplace, in Russia it is still exclusive. 2020. (rus.).
15. Fedorov A.A. Analysis of strategies for implementing information modeling in leading countries. Engineering journal of Don. 2019; 4(55):21. EDN UECARM. (rus.).
16. Shamreeva A., Doroschkin A. Analysis of the influencing factors for the practical application of BIM in combination with AI in Germany. ECPPM 2021 — eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. 2021; 536-543. DOI: 10.1201/9781003191476-72
17. Borrmann A., Forster C., Liebich T., König M., Tulke J. Germany’s governmental BIM initiative — The BIM4INFRA2020 project implementing the BIM Roadmap. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2021; 452-465. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_31
18. Sebastian R., Haak W., Vos E. BIM application for integrated design and engineering in small-scale housing development: a pilot project in The Netherlands. Future Trends in Architectural Management. 2009
19. Sebastian R., van Berlo L. Tool for benchmarking BIM performance of design, engineering and construction firms in The Netherlands. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. 2010; 6(4):254-263. DOI: 10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS3.
20. Galić M., Venkrbec V., Weise F., Feine I., Pučko, Z., Klanšek U. Review of BIM’s Implementation in some EU AEC Industries. 13th International Conference Organization, Technology and Management in Construction. 2017.
21. Korol' M. The state customer is moving to BIM. In Europe. 2017. (rus.).
22. Skvortsov A.V. Review of the international regulatory framework in the field of BIM. CAD and GIS of highways. 2016; 2(7):4-48. DOI: 10.17273/ CADGIS.2016.2.1. EDN XPPLKH. (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Kisel T.N. Measures of state support for the implementation of information modelling technologies in Russia. Vestnik MGSU. 2023;18(12):2015-2024. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.12.2015-2024
Views:
255
Email this article 