Emerging trends in the construction market under increasing sanctions pressure

Introduction. The geopolitical and economic agenda for Russia’s economic sovereignty has required significant changes in the modes of production and, consequently, in the economic environment. The construction market is an extremely important and integral part of it in the conditions of increasing sanctions pressure. The analysis of the SMO period has convincingly proved the viability of market rules of business turnover in the investment and construction sector. None of its segments turned out to be in crisis and depression.

Materials and methods. Business activity grew frontally. Meanwhile, the observed time compression of the emergence of new growing external challenges, which revealed and made it possible to identify latent processes slowing down the modernization of the construction industry, prompted the authors to change the generally accepted perspective of studying the construction market from the use of the method of decomposition of its segments to the implementation of the methodological approach of “time management in restructured space” in order to complement the megapolis concept of settlement with the strategy of accelerated development of territories in the points and corridors of economic.

Results. The synthesized objectives of total acceleration of territorial, project, subject and resource maneuvering allowed to identify goals and objectives of transformation of commodity-money relations emerging within the construction market in the context of the selected types of capital construction. In this context, the authors have identified and disclosed the content of the following tasks of construction market development: providing spatial and temporal maneuverability of production capacities of market entities; synchronization and scaling of investment and construction processes; reshoring and technological import substitution; unfinished construction liquidation; supporting development rates of socially-oriented segment of construction market. Solving these tasks will require territorial, project, subject and resource front-end maneuvering. As practice has shown, this is impossible without institutionalization of a new toolkit of spatial-territorial development. Its goal is to fully realize the country’s geospatial advantage by mitigating the risks of the megacity concept of settlement, while simultaneously developing territories not only at points, but also along major spatial corridors of economic growth.

Conclusions. The article took into account approaches to accelerate the commissioning of various types of capital construction projects, which allowed the study to identify the directions of improving market mechanisms across different ССP. The unity of different directions is ensured by preventive methods of avoiding the conflict of economic interests, and the resolution of inevitably arising contradictions of development is proposed using methods of extrajudicial resolution of economic disputes, based on the use of spatial-territorial, legal, judicial, cost, construction and technical, environmental expertise.

1. Yaskova N.Yu., Zaytseva L.I., Viktorov M.Yu. Issues in the implementation of an import substitution strategy in Russia’s construction sector. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2022; 14(4):29. EDN HHCHOO. (rus.).

2. Shmyrev A.V., Yaushev A.A. Import substitution in the Russian construction industry under western sanctions: problems and solutions. Innovational Economics. 2023; 1(34):82-99. EDN QLFCFU. (rus.).

3. Yaskova N.Yu., Zaitseva L.I. Construction: overcoming growth limits. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2022; 4:12-17. EDN SVMDQW.

4. Yaskova N.Yu., Lukmanova I.G., Zaytseva L.I. Organizational and economic approaches and methods of development of the construction industry in a climate of sanctions pressure. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2022; 17(12):1707-1715. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2022.12.1707-1715. EDN CAXKQI. (rus.).

5. Lemeshko M.V. Trends in the development of industrial construction in Russia at the present stage. Construction Economy. 2023; 3:21-27. EDN EYIPPP. (rus.).

6. Komarova A.V. Development of the construction industry at the current stage. Economics of the New World. 2020; 5(3):(18):28-38. EDN OUDAZP. (rus.).

7. Sarchenko V.I., Khirevich S.A., Sarchenko M.V. Problems of ensuring the competitiveness of investment and construction activities under new macroeconomic conditions and approaches to their resolution. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2022; 1:82-87. EDN YUNGEL.

8. Yas’kova N.Yu., Sarchenko V.I., Khire-vich S.A. Comprehensive approach to creating a quality urban environment. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2020; 2:12-21. DOI: 10.22227/2073-8412. 2020.2.12-21. EDN HDYWVW. (rus.).

9. Alekseev S.A., Viktorov M.Yu., Grabovyi P.G., Zaitseva L.I., Kazansky N.V., Kaminsky M.A. et al. Spatial restructuring. New meanings and rules of investment and construction activities. Moscow, Delo, 2019; 454. EDN KGWAKW. (rus.).

10. Azizova-Poluektova А.N., Dyakov I.A., Ivanova U.V. Coliving — new format of housing. Architectural Research. 2021; 1(25):45-51. EDN KNEYXQ. (rus.).

11. Shumakova E.V. Apart-hotel as an innovative form of organization of a hotel business. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. 2019; 8(3):(28):400-402. DOI: 10.26140/anie-2019-0803-0093. EDN EWPKOM. (rus.).

12. Musavengane R. Small hotels and responsible tourism practice: Hoteliers’ perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 220:786-799. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.143

13. Weber K. Service failure and recovery in an all-suite hotel/serviced apartment context: a case study. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 2009; 26(2):195-199. DOI: 10.1080/10548400902864834

14. Dossche C., Boel V., De Corte W. Use of life cycle assessments in the construction sector: critical review. Procedia Engineering. 2017; 171:302-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.338

15. Akinradewo O., Aigbavboa C., Aghimien D., Oke A., Ogunbayo B. Modular method of construction in developing countries: the underlying challenges. International Journal of Construction Management. 2021; 23(8):1344-1354. DOI: 10.1080/ 15623599.2021.1970300

16. Shoar S., Yiu T.W., Payan S., Parchamijalal M. Modeling cost overrun in building construction projects using the interpretive structural modeling approach: a developing country perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2021; 30(2):365-392. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-08-2021-0732

17. Rossokhin V.V., Ryabova E.V. Identification of life cycle stages characterising factors. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2019; 3:92-109. EDN XCEZLX. (rus.).

18. Shtefan M.A., Elizarova J.M. Investment project efficiency and risk evaluation: an integrated approach. Business Informatics. 2018; 2018(4):54-65. DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2018.4.54.65

19. Mozuriunaite S., Sabaityte J. To what extent we do understand smart cities and characteristics influencing city smartness. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2021; 45(1):1-8. DOI: 10.3846/jau.2021.12392

20. Scott A.J. Urbanization, work and community: the logic of city life in the contemporary world. Quality Innovation Prosperity. 2017; 21(1):9. DOI: 10.12776/QIP.V21I1.785

21. Sarchenko V.I., Khirevich S.A., Sarchenko M.V. The cost modeling of urbanized areas. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2021; 4:42-48. EDN UDFYPD.

22. Zaitseva L.I. Conditions and background for the introduction of non-judicial dispute resolution methods in the investment and construction sphere. Public Administration. 2019; 21(4):66-69. DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2019-21-4-66-69. EDN NTASUN.