Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Development of architectural environment of underground structures of public and trading complexes on the example of reconstruction of Paveletsky station square

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.1.36-44

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of studying the development of underground multi-level structures of public and trade complexes (PTC) is determined by the need for active development of underground space in large and major cities in accordance with the Strategy of Spatial Development of Russia until 2025. The formation of immersive environment in the complexes based on VR/AR technologies was facilitated by socio-economic conditions associated with the implementation of the federal project “Digital Technologies” until 2024. Active integration of landscape elements into the structure of the centres is caused by the need for environmental rehabilitation of urban areas in accordance with the Environmental Safety Strategy of the Russian Federation until 2025. The aim of the research is to identify the peculiarities of the development in the 2020s of the architectural environment of multi-level underground structures of public and trade complexes in the context of reconstruction of the central districts of large and major cities in areas that include a large urban square, using the example of the “Paveletskaya Plaza” underground multifunctional centre. The task of the analysis is to determine new trends in the development of the architectural environment of the PTC in the modern socio-economic, urban planning, environmental conditions of large and major cities that meet their requirements.

Materials and methods. The study of literary sources, scientific publications, Internet resources, as well as field surveys of the complexes. Development of schematic spatial models of the complexes based on the identified modern trends of their architectural and planning organization.

Results. The necessity to refine the existing PTC classification in the sites that include a large urban area has been identified.

Conclusions. The omnichannel behavior of buyers requires development of architectural environment of the centres based on the expansion of volume and composition of public function, development of techniques of immersive environment creation, as well as the formation of a landscape at above-platform levels.

About the Authors

E. V. Mikhaylova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Elena V. Mikhaylova — Candidate of Architecture, Associate Professor of the Department of Fundamentals of Architecture and Artistic Communications

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



E. K. Kalinichenko
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Ekaterina K. Kalinichenko — student

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



M. O. Belova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Margarita O. Belova — student

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



References

1. Kalinichenko E.K., Kurochkina V.A., Belova M.O. The quality of the urban environment and the impact of the city on the environment. Geoecology: theory and practice : a collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the All-Russian student conference with international participation. 2022; 411-419. (rus.).

2. Levchenko A.N., Dmitriev A.N., Korchak A.V., Kartozia B.A., Fedunets B.I. On the prospects for the development of a system of regulatory documents for the development of urban underground space. Metro and Tunnels. 2007; 4:4-6. EDN ULVUHP. (rus.).

3. Demers C. Over & underground spaces & networks integrations a case study: the international district of Montreal. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 165:726-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.770

4. Belova M.O., Kalinichenko E.K. Formation of a comfortable urban environment in Moscow: the degree of satisfaction of citizens. Student Science Days : a collection of reports of a scientific and technical conference on the results of research work of students of the Institute of Economics, Management and Communications in the field of construction and real estate of the National Research University MGSU. 2023; 581-584. (rus.).

5. Mikhaylova E.V. The impact of digitalization of the economy on the socio-economic aspects of the development of public and shopping centers with multi-level underground structures in large and major cities. Innovations and Investments. 2022; 4:120-124. (rus.).

6. Chen Y., Chen Z., Guo D., Zhao Z., Lin T., Zhang C. Underground space use of urban built-up areas in the central city of Nanjing: Insight based on a dynamic population distribution. Underground Space. 2022; 7(5):748-766. DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.12.006

7. Mikhaylova E.V. Prospects for the introduction of VR/AR technologies in the architectural environment of public and shopping complexes with underground tiers in large and largest cities in the context of the active development of immersion spaces. Innovations and Investments. 2022; 7:94-97. (rus.).

8. Li H.-Q., Parriaux A., Thalmann P. The way to plan a sustainable “deep city”: The economic model and strategic framework. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference of ACUUS: Advances in Underground Space Development, ACUUS. 2012. DOI: 10.3850/978-981-07-3757-3RP-021-P074

9. Belyaev V. Underground development as part of the strategy for sustainable spatial development of the city of Moscow. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 165:277-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.701

10. Labbé M. Architecture of underground spaces: From isolated innovations to connected urbanism. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2016; 55:153-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.004

11. Xia H., Lin C., Liu X., Liu Z. Urban underground space capacity demand forecasting based on sustainable concept : a review. Energy and Buildings. 2022; 255:111656. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111656

12. Han G., Leng J. Urban underground space planning based on FPGA and virtual reality system. Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2021; 80:103601. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103601

13. Kurochkina V.A., Kalinichenko E.K., Belova M.O. Small architectural forms in open public spaces of the city. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2021; 13(5):23. DOI: 10.15862/28NZVN521. EDN CZVMUM. (rus.).

14. Kurochkina V.A., Klimov V.A., Belova M.O., Kalinichenko E.K. Role of small architectural structures in the organization of urban open public. European Proceedings of Life Sciences. 2022. DOI: 10.15405/epls.22011.34

15. Kalinichenko E.K., Kurochkina V.A., Belova M.O. Basic principles and criteria for the formation of urban public spaces: domestic and foreign experience. Geoecology: theory and practice : a collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the All-Russian student conference with international participation. 2021; 141-146. (rus.).

16. Dong Y.-H., Peng F.-L., Qiao Y.-K., Zhang J.-B., Wu X.-L. Measuring the monetary value of environmental externalities derived from urban underground facilities: Towards a better understanding of sustainable underground spaces. Energy and Buildings. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111313

17. Zhang C., Zhao Z., Guo D., Gong D., Chen Y. Optimization of spatial layouts for deep underground infrastructure in central business districts based on a multi-agent system model. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2023; 135:105046. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105046

18. Chumachenko S.G. Improving the algorithm for strategic planning of urban landscape gardening in large cities. National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2011; 7(100):64-68. EDN NCSUGZ. (rus.).

19. Mikhaylova E.V. The architectural environment of public and shopping complexes with multi-level underground structures. Moscow, 2012; 207. EDN OPVDSH. (rus.).

20. Vlasenko L.V., Belova M.O., Kalinichenko E.K. Formation of public space as an opportunity for effective personal development. Science and education: current research and development : materials of the V All-Russian scientific and practical conference. 2022; 129-133. (rus.).

21. Wang X., Shen L., Shi S. Evaluation of underground space perception: A user-perspective investigation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2023; 131:104822. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104822

22. Dong L., He Y., Qi Q., Wang W. Optimization of daylight in atrium in underground commercial spaces: A case study in Chongqing, China. Energy and Buildings. 2022; 256:111739. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111739

23. Yuan H., He Y., Wu Y. A comparative study on urban underground space planning system between China and Japan. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 48:101541. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101541

24. Belova M.O., Kalinichenko E.K. Organization of recreational spaces in Moscow (using the example of the national park “Losiny Ostrov”). Student Science Days : a collection of reports of a scientific and technical conference on the results of research work of students of the Institute of Economics, Management and Communications in the field of construction and real estate of the National Research University MGSU. 2022; 74-77. EDN MKHMPE. (rus.).


Review

For citations:


Mikhaylova E.V., Kalinichenko E.K., Belova M.O. Development of architectural environment of underground structures of public and trading complexes on the example of reconstruction of Paveletsky station square. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(1):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.1.36-44

Views: 293


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)