Estimation of stability of lifting equipment during excavation of pits in cramped conditions
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.2.203-215
Abstract
Introduction. The paper illustrates the necessity and place of the problem of stability assessment of lifting devices applied for excavation in cramped conditions, which are typical for urban areas with dense urban development when laying underground transport facilities on the example of the open method of works on the construction of the Moscow Metro.
Materials and methods. Two sites on the territory of Moscow and different cranes of Liebherr company were considered in order to investigate the influence of geotechnical parameters on stability and safety of heavy lifting equipment. In addition, numerical modelling was carried out to determine displacements and deformations at different locations of the crane with respect to the excavation fence.
Results. Horizontal and vertical displacements and total deformations of the pit fence were obtained by means of numerical modelling with the use of geotechnical software systems PLAXIS 2D and PLAXIS 3D. Among other things, we analyzed the usage of PAG slabs, as well as construction of the top tier of the spacing system with the use of 1.5 × 1.5 m inventory slabs.
Conclusions. The relevant issue is an analytical calculation for situations that can arise in solving practical problems, in particular, in the development of the project of works for the installation of a lifting device near the pit with a fence. Surface layers of soils (up to 6 m) have a special and primary influence on the result of the calculation. If the lifting device is installed in bulk soil of natural origin, it is mandatory to replace it with a harder soil or to lay additional concrete slabs with a larger area to reduce the direct load on the ground. In special cases, the numerical modelling should be performed separately for heavy truck cranes with a lifting capacity of 250 tons and more, provided that the guardrail is made without a spacing system (“cantilever type”).
About the Authors
N. S. NikitinaRussian Federation
Nadezhda S. Nikitina — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
ID RSCI: 1138117
N. K. Melnikov
Russian Federation
Nikolay K. Melnikov — master’s student of the Department of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Golubev G.E. Metropolitans and the City. Underground Space of the World. 1995; 2:21-22. (rus.).
2. Zertsalov M.G., Konyukhov D.S., Merkin V.E. Comprehensive Development of Underground Space. Moscow, ASV Publishing House, 2015. (rus.).
3. Konyukhov D.S. Basic principles of comprehensive development of underground space in the renovation of residential areas in Moscow. Metro and Tunnels. 2019; 2:38-40. EDN HRVIXW. (rus.).
4. Konyukhov D.S., Andreev A.A., Vdovin A.A., Petunina D.S. Development of Underground Space as a Solution to Urban Planning Problems. Metro and Tunnels. 2017; 3-4:2-5. EDN ZJTGQJ. (rus.).
5. Admiral H., Coronado A. Dankable and investment-ready underground space developments. 16th World Conference of the Associated Research Centers for the Urban Underground Space (ACUUS 2018). 2018.
6. Tang H., Behbahani S.S., Iseley T. Utility tunnelling: A solution for managing the urban underground space in China. ITA — AITES World Tunnel Congress, 21–26 April 2018. 2018; 348-354.
7. Konyukhov D.S. Criteria analysis of contemporary technologies of underground construction. Geotechnics. 2021; 13(1):40-55. DOI: 10.25296/2221-5514-2021-13-1-40-54. EDN QGZRZK. (rus.).
8. Mangushev R.A., Nikiforova N.S. Technological Settlements of Buildings and Structures in the Zone of Influence of Underground Construction. Moscow, ASV Publishing House, 2017; 160. (rus.).
9. Mangushev R.A., Nikiforova N.S., Konyushkov V.V., Osokin A.I., Sapin D.A. Design and Construction of Underground Structures in Open Excavations. Moscow, ASV Publishing House, 2017; 256. (rus.).
10. Atzl G. Challenges and solutions for large scale tunnelling in urban environment. Proceeding of the World Tunnel Congress 2017. Surface challenges — Underground solutions. 2017.
11. Perminov N., Perminov A. Geotechnical protection of engineering infrastructure objects in large cities under intense anthropogenic impact and long term operation. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 165:455-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.720. EDN WIJHUR.
12. Zertsalov M.G., Kazachenko S.A., Konyukhov D.S. Investigation of foundation pit excavation influence on adjacent buildings. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014; 6:77-86. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.6.77-86 (rus.).
13. Pachurin G.V., Filippov A.A., Shevchenko S.M. Organization of safe operation of lifting structures at a construction enterprise. Current Issues of Technical Sciences in Modern Conditions : Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2018; 73-77. EDN YRIXLC. (rus.).
14. Epov D.A. Use of safety devices and devices on lifting structures. Bulletin of Modern Research. 2021; 3-5(41):12-15. EDN LUJGBD. (rus.).
15. Yang T., Sun N., Chen H., Fang Y. Motion trajectory-based transportation control for 3-D boom cranes: Analysis, design, and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2019; 66(5):3636-3646. DOI: 10.1109/tie.2018.2853604. (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Nikitina N.S., Melnikov N.K. Estimation of stability of lifting equipment during excavation of pits in cramped conditions. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(2):203-215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.2.203-215