Analytical method for determining the stress-strain state of modular buildings
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.3.367-376
Abstract
Introduction. Active introduction of modular buildings into the practice of modern construction causes the necessity to develop methods of their calculation. At the same time, there are no specialized guidelines for the design of modular buildings. It is impossible to manage only with numerical methods of calculation for forming design recommendations. Therefore, the creation of an analytical method of calculation of modular buildings is an important area of research. The question of determination of forces in elements of modular buildings with bearing columns and rigid intramodular connections is considered.
Materials and methods. The determination of forces in the elements of modular buildings from vertical loads can be carried out with high accuracy using well-known formulas of building mechanics. The main difficulty is the determination of dynamic effects (wind pulsation and seismic load). It is proposed to use a cantilever construction scheme with the decomposition of masses at the floor level. As a result of calculations, a set of inertial forces is formed from pulsation and seismic action. Modular programme was written to simplify the calculations. The programme is convenient for making preliminary and variant calculations and research of modular building structures.
Results. The presented analytical method for determining the forces in the elements of modular buildings shows good convergence of the results with the finite element method. On a concrete example, it is shown that there is practically no discrepancy in determination of forces from vertical loads. The discrepancy from the combined effect of the static and pulsation components is 4.2–16.6 % for bending moments and 1.3–6 % for longitudinal forces. The discrepancy in determining the forces from the seismic load is within the range of 5–10 % for both bending moments and longitudinal forces.
Conclusions. The method is convenient for application at the stage of qualitative assessment of design solutions, variant calculations and search for rational design solutions of modular buildings.
About the Authors
V. S. Shirokov
Samara State Technical University (SamGTU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viacheslav S. Shirokov — senior lecturer at the Department of Metal and Wooden Structures
244 Molodogvardeyskaya st., Samara, 443100
ID RSCI: 665300, ResearcherID: N-5278-2016
T. A. Belash
Research Center “Construction”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Belash — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Building Structures, Constructions and Materials
6 2nd Institutskaya st., Moscow, 109428
ID RSCI: 66498
T. E. Gordeeva
Samara State Technical University (SamGTU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana E. Gordeeva — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Construction and Technology
244 Molodogvardeyskaya st., Samara, 443100
ID RSCI: 301105
References
1. Abramyan S.G., Iliev A.B. Features of technologies of prefabricated buildings and structures. Scientific research of higher school in the field of construction and architecture : the international scientific-practical conference. 2018; 22-27. EDN YQHWNF. (rus.).
2. Zakharova M.V., Ponomarev A.B. Experience in constructing buildings and structures using modular technology. Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Construction and Architecture. 2017; 8(1):148-155. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9826/2017.1.13.EDN YLXSPN. (rus.).
3. Zaharova A.S. Arrangement of oil and gas fields and their infrastructure. Engineering Journal of Don. 2020; 11(71):329-338. EDN NWFFYL. (rus.).
4. Ivanov A.A. Analysis of the market for block-modular buildings from metal structures for the oil and gas sector. Beginning in science : materials of the IV international scientific-practical conference of schoolchildren, students, undergraduates and graduate students. 2017; 219-222. EDN YJEBSN. (rus.).
5. Lawson R., Ogden R., Pedreschi R., Grubb P., Popo-Ola S. Developments in pre-fabricated systems in light steel and modular construction. The Structural engineer. 2005; 83:28-35.
6. Lawson R.M., Richards J. Modular design for high-rise buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers — Structures and Buildings. 2010; 163(3):151-164. DOI: 10.1680/stbu.2010.163.3.151
7. Thai H.-T., Ngo T., Uy B. A review on modular construction for high-rise buildings. Structures. 2020; 28:1265-1290. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.070
8. Ferdous W., Bai Y., Ngo T.D., Manalo A., Mendis P. New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings : a state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures. 2019; 183:883-893. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.061
9. Innovation in modular building construction. The Hong Kong Institute of Steel Construction, 2018. DOI: 10.18057/ICASS2018.K.05
10. Liew J.Y.R., Dai Z., Chua Y.S. Steel concrete composite systems for modular construction of high-rise buildings. Proceedings 12th international conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures — ASCCS 2018. 2018. DOI: 10.4995/ASCCS2018.2018.7220
11. Liew J.Y.R., Chua Y.S., Dai Z. Steel concrete composite systems for modular construction of high-rise buildings. Structures. 2019; 21:135-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.02.010
12. Annan C.D., Youssef M.A., El Naggar M.H. Seismic overstrength in braced frames of modular steel buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2008; 13(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1080/13632460802212576
13. Zhao F., Yu Y., Lin S., Ding F. Evaluation of the working mechanisms and simplified models of endplate-type inter-module connections. Structures. 2021; 32:562-577. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.034
14. Lacey A.W., Chen W., Hao H., Bi K. Effect of inter-module connection stiffness on structural response of a modular steel building subjected to wind and earthquake load. Engineering Structures. 2020; 213:110628. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110628
15. Lacey A.W., Chen W., Hao H., Bi K. Lateral behaviour of modular steel building with simplified models of new inter-module connections. Engineering Structures. 2021; 236:112103. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112103
16. Lacey A.W., Chen W., Hao H., Bi K. Numerical study of the structural response to wind loading: modular building case study. 13th International Conference on Steel, Space and Composite Structures. 2018.
17. Lacey A.W., Chen W., Hao H., Bi K. Structural response of modular buildings : an overview. Journal of Building Engineering. 2018; 16:45-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.008
18. Shirokov V.S., Kholopov I.S., Solovejv A.V. Determination of the frequency of natural vibrations of a modular building. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 153:655-661. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.218
19. Shirokov V.S., Gordeeva T.E., Bocharov A.Yu. Analytic method of structural analysis of modular buildings. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 775(1):012148. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/775/1/012148
20. Gatheeshgar P., Parker S., Askew K., Poologanathan K., Navaratnam S., McIntosh A. Flexural behaviour and design of modular construction optimised beams. Structures. 2021; 32:1048-1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.009
Review
For citations:
Shirokov V.S., Belash T.A., Gordeeva T.E. Analytical method for determining the stress-strain state of modular buildings. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(3):367-376. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.3.367-376
Views:
208
Email this article 