Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Life cycle management of capital construction object with minimization of atmospheric air pollution

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.3.456-468

Abstract

Introduction. The existing approaches to management decision-making in construction production give the opportunity to select options only for a certain stage of the capital construction object life cycle (LC CCO), not considering their effectiveness throughout the whole LC. To eliminate this disadvantage, the authors propose a system of information support for the LC CСO management, taking into account the minimization of atmospheric air dust pollution during the implementation of decisions.

Materials and methods. Within the framework of a systematic approach to the LC CCO management, the correct criteria choice is of crucial importance, using which an optimal decision can be made. On the other hand, the need to ensure the effectiveness of managerial decisions throughout the LC CCO involves the development of a system that allows to predict the managed object behavior throughout its entire life cycle already in the initial stages. Since the occurrence of various events (situations) during the LC CCO is random, the determination of the probability of occurrence of these or those events is of great importance. Technical means for monitoring atmospheric air pollution by dust particles PM2.5 and PM10 are presented.

Results. To take into account other decision-making criteria, besides technical and economic indicators, the experimentally obtained reduced values of dust concentration in atmospheric air are proposed. For this purpose, the sources of such pollution in all the LC CCO stages are systematized. Based on the developed life cycle model, expressions for determining the probability of events occurrence during the LC CCO are obtained. This stochastic model allows you to predict the state of the control object when implementing a particular solution.
The application of the proposed methodology made it possible to determine the fine dust concentration and the probability of exceeding the maximum permissible concentration in some types of work to calculate the effectiveness of the considered management decisions.

Conclusions. An information support system was built, which, unlike the applied methods, makes it possible to make decisions on the LC CCO management, not only taking into account the technical and economic efficiency of the compared options, but also the degree of atmospheric air dust pollution. In addition, the developed information support allows you to take into account the fact that certain events occurrence is random during the LC CCO with the determination of their occurrence probability.

About the Authors

V. N. Azarov
Volgograd State Technical University (VSTU)
Russian Federation

Valerii N. Azarov — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Life Safety in Construction and Urban Economy, Institute of Architecture and Construction, Advisor to RAASN

1 Akademicheskaya st., Volgograd, 400074

ID RSCI: 148320, Scopus: 7004170297



O. V. Burlachenko
Volgograd State Technical University (VSTU)
Russian Federation

Oleg V. Burlachenko — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Construction Production Technology, Deputy Director of the Institute of Architecture and Construction for Research

1 Akademicheskaya st., Volgograd, 400074

ID RSCI: 282520, Scopus: 417611032900, ResearcherID: ABF-4142-2020



A. O. Burlachenko
Volgograd State Technical University (VSTU)
Russian Federation

Alexander O. Burlachenko — junior researcher, postgraduate student of the Department of Life Safety in Construction and Urban Economy, Institute of Architecture and Construction

1 Akademicheskaya st., Volgograd, 400074

ID RSCI: 1161260, Scopus: 57207734779, ResearcherID: HHM-5981-2022



M. D. Azarova
Volgograd State Technical University (VSTU)
Russian Federation

Maria D. Azarova — master’s student, Institute of Architecture and Construction

1 Akademicheskaya st., Volgograd, 400074

ID RSCI: 1186126



References

1. Telichenko V.I., Lapidus A.A., Morozenko A.A. Information modeling of technologies and business processes in construction. Moscow, ASV Publishing House, 2008; 144. EDN SAPKVZ. (rus.).

2. Ginzburg A.V., Nesterova E.I. Technology of continuous information support of life cycle of construction object. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2011; 5:317. EDN OWECEN. (rus.).

3. Katranov I., Lapidus A. Mobile building life cycle. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018; 193:03011. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819303011

4. Burlachenko O.V., Elfimov K.A., Bunin D.V. Information support of life cycle management of construction projects in conception of BIM. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture. 2018; 54(73):217-221. EDN YUMLJJ. (rus.).

5. Abramyan S.G., Burlachenko O.V., Oganesyan O.V., Burlachenko A.O. The life cycle management system for the capital construction objects using digital technologies. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture. 2021; 4(85):305-313. EDN QZAXQX. (rus.).

6. Azarov V.N., Burlachenko A.O. The construction production organization taking into account the ecological safety of the decisions taken. Biospheric Compatibility: Human, Region, Technologies. 2023; 1(41):76-83. DOI: 10.21869/2311-1518-2023-41-1-76-83. EDN KKXFQT. (rus.).

7. Abramyan S.G., Burlachenko O.V., Oganesyan O.V., Burlachenko A.O., Pleshakov V.V. Possibilities of digital technologies for each stage of the life cycle of the building system. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture. 2022; 2(87):317-325. EDN TJMJSS. (rus.).

8. Abramyan S.G., Burlachenko O.V., Oganesyan O.V., Soboleva E.D., Burlachenko A.O., Pleshakov V.V. On the issue of the building systems life cycle stages in the context of the principles of information modeling. Engineering journal of Don. 2022; 6(90):607-620. EDN ETPPQZ. (rus.).

9. Muleski G.E., Cowherd C., Kinsey J.S. Particulate emissions from construction activities. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2005; 55(6):772-783. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464669

10. Azarmi F., Kumar P., Marsh D., Fuller G. Assessment of the long-term impacts of PM10 and PM2.5 particles from construction works on surrounding areas. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2016; 18(2):208-221. DOI: 10.1039/c5em00549c

11. Kalyuzhina E.A., Sergina N.M., Elfimov K.A., Strelyaeva A.B. Research of dust release in the surrounding atmosphere and into the atmosphere of the working area in production of repair and construction works. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture. 2020; 4(81):371-378. EDN CCPQTW. (rus.).

12. Luo Q., Huang L., Liu Y., Xue X., Zhou F., Hua J. Monitoring study on dust dispersion properties during earthwork construction. Sustainability. 2021; 13(15):8451. DOI: 10.3390/su13158451

13. Azarov V.N., Elfimov K.A., Davudov R.I., Vasilev A.N., Simakov V.S. On the use of random functions for the analysis of dust pollution of pedestrian zones. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture. 2022; 2(87):171-177. EDN HRHQRM. (rus.).

14. Khan M., Khan N., Skibniewski M.J., Park C. Environmental Particulate Matter (PM) exposure assessment of construction activities using low-cost PM sensor and latin hypercubic technique. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14):7797. DOI: 10.3390/su13147797

15. Yang J., Shi B., Shi Y., Marvin S., Zheng Y., Xia G. Air pollution dispersal in high density urban areas: Research on the triadic relation of wind, air pollution, and urban form. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020; 54:101941. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101941

16. Tao G.W., Feng J.C., Feng H.B., Feng H., Zhang K. Reducing construction dust pollution by planning construction site layout. Buildings. 2022; 12(5):531. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12050531

17. Sysoeva E.V., Gelmanova M.O. Assessment of PM2.5 particulate air pollution near highways. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2023; 18(6):889-900. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54137525 DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935. 2023.6.889-900

18. Kaur K., Kelly K.E. Performance evaluation of the Alphasense OPC-N3 and Plantower PMS5003 sensor in measuring dust events in the Salt Lake Valley, Utah. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2023; 16(10):2455-2470. DOI: 10.5194/amt-16-2455-2023

19. Schwarz A.D., Meyer J., Dittler A. Opportunities for low-cost particulate matter sensors in filter emission measurements. Chemical Engineering & Technology. 2018; 41(9):1826-1832. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201800209

20. Cheriyan D., Choi J.H. Data on different sized particulate matter concentration produced from a construction activity. Data in Brief. 2020; 33:106467. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106467

21. Sidyakin P., Marinin N., Shul´ga S., Chichirov K. Road construction works as source of dust air pollution. Vestnik SGASU. Town Planning and Architecture. 2014; 2(15):72-76. DOI: 10.17673/Vestnik.2014.02.12. EDN SXUBJX. (rus.).

22. Kohlman-Rabbani E.R., Shapira A., Martins A.R.B., Barkokébas B. Characterization and evaluation of dust on building construction sites in Brazil. The Open Occupational Health & Safety Journal. 2014; 5(1):1-8. DOI: 10.2174/1876216601405010001


Review

For citations:


Azarov V.N., Burlachenko O.V., Burlachenko A.O., Azarova M.D. Life cycle management of capital construction object with minimization of atmospheric air pollution. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(3):456-468. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.3.456-468

Views: 292


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)