Experience of implementation of Eurocodes in the design of steel structures in the Republic of Belarus
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.5.740-751
Abstract
Introduction. The Republic of Belarus is one of the first countries on the territory of the CIS, which introduced European design standards (Eurocodes) on its territory, while preserving the effect of building standards developed on the basis of Soviet SNIP. The republic accumulated considerable experience in the practical application and comparative analysis of these two systems of standards. The relevance of this study is contained in the discovery of the most distinctive features of normative documents, on the basis of which it is possible to determine further directions of scientific research and improvement of domestic norms.
Materials and methods. Analysis and generalization of experience.
Results. The paper presents the results of generalization of the experience of practical application and comparative analysis of Eurocode and CP in relation to the design of steel structures. The analysis of partial factors, classification of cross sections, welded and bolted joints is given.
Conclusions. Methodological approaches to checking limit states and ensuring the reliability of steel structures in CP and Eurocodes are very similar, but there are differences in the values and sets of partial factors. When designing steel structures according to Eurocode, the methods of classification of cross-sections of rolled profiles produced according to GOST or TS need to be adjusted. Eurocode 3 provides more possibilities in the design of welded and bolted joints.
About the Authors
A. B. ShurynBelarus
Andrei B. Shuryn — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Building Structures
267 Moskovskaya st., Brest, 224017
Scopus: 57220833497
V. V. Nadolski
Belarus
Vitali V. Nadolski — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Construction Technology; Associate Professor of the Department of Building Structures
267 Moskovskaya st., Brest, 224017;
65 Independence Avenue, Minsk, 220013
RISC AuthorID: 859575, Scopus: 56153169800
References
1. Streletsky N.S. Fundamentals of statistical accounting of the safety factor of structures. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1947; 95. (rus.).
2. Baldin V.A., Goldenblat I.I., Kochenov V.I., Pildish M.Ya., Tal K.E. Calculation of building structures based on limit states. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1951; 272. (rus.).
3. Novák L., Cervenka J., Cervenka V., Novák D., Sýkora M. Comparison of advanced semi-probabilistic methods for design and assessment of concrete structures. Structural Concrete. 2022; 24(1):771-787. DOI: 10.1002/suco.202200179
4. Baldin V.A., Uritsky M.R. Provision of standard and calculated resistances of low-carbon steel for building metal structures. Industrial Construction. 1978; 6:19-21. EDN ZIFGUP. (rus.).
5. Belsky G.E. On the limit states of elements of metal structures under compression (tension) with bending. Structural Mechanics and Calculation of Structures. 1973; 2:51-57. (rus.).
6. Allaix D.L., Carbone V.I., Mancini G. Global safety format for non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Structural Concrete. 2013; 14(1):29-42. DOI: 10.1002/suco.201200017
7. Sykora M., Holicky M. Safety format for non-linear analysis in the model code — verification of reliability level. Proceeding of fib Symposium on Concrete Engine-ering for Excellence and Efficiency. 2011; 943-946.
8. Nadolski V.V., Holicky M., Sykora M., Tur V.V. Comparison of Reliability Levels Provided by the Eurocodes and Standards of the Russian Federation. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2013; 6:7-20. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2013.6.7-20. EDN QGRYLZ. (rus.).
9. Tur V., Nadolski V. The partial factor values calibration for the ultimate limit state checking of steel structures for the conditions republic of Belarus. Part 1. Building and Reconstruction. 2016; 4(66):73-84. EDN WJIFTB. (rus.).
10. Marková J., Holický M., Jung K., Sýkora M. Reliability of existing reinforced concrete slabs exposed to punching shear. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings. 2022; 36:119-126. DOI: 10.14311/APP.2022.36.0119
11. Prokop J., Odrobiňák J., Farbák M., Novotný V. Load-carrying capacity of bailey bridge in civil applications. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(8):3788. DOI: 10.3390/app12083788
12. Holicky M. Safety design of lightweight roofs exposed to snow load. The Art of Resisting Extreme Natural Forces. 2007; 58. DOI. 10.2495/en070061
13. Sýkora M., Holický M. Reliability-based design of roofs exposed to a snow load. Shanghai, Tongji University Press, 2009; 183-188.
14. Hyman P., Sriramula S., Osofero A.I. Calibration of safety factors for prestressed stayed steel columns. Architecture, Structures and Construction. 2022; 2(3):365-380. DOI: 10.1007/s44150-022-00066-5
15. Koteš P., Prokop J., Strieška M., Vičan J. Calibration of partial safety factors according to Eurocodes. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2017; 117:00088. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201711700088
16. Konečný P., Horňáková M., Lehner P., Rovnanikova P., Sykora M. Model uncertainty in diffusion coefficient for chloride ingress into concrete. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2021; 31:147-153. 10.1016/j.prostr.2021.03.023
17. Holický M., Retief J.V., Sýkora M. Assessment of model uncertainties for structural resistance. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2016; 45:188-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.09.008
18. Shankar S., Kumar R., Khatri A.P., Gupta L.M. Comparison of section classification procedure of different codes. ASPS Conference Proceedings. 2022; 1(1):443-447. DOI: 10.38208/acp.v1.533
19. Graciano-Gallego C.A., Loaiza N., Casanova E. A comparative analysis of resistance models for austenitic stainless steel girders subjected to concentrated loads. Revista UIS Ingenierías. 2021; 21(1). DOI: 10.18273/revuin.v21n1-2022008
20. Shurin A.B., Tusnin A.R., Zinkevich I.V., Mukhin A.V. Design of Steel Structures in Accordance with EUROCODES Requirements. Moscow, ASV Publishing House, 2021; 224. (rus.).
21. Bezas M.Z., Demonceau J.F., Vayas I., Jaspart J.P. Classification and cross-section resistance of equal-leg rolled angle profiles. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2021; 185:106842. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106842
22. Bezas M.Z., Demonceau J.F., Vayas I., Jaspart J.P. Compression tests on large angle columns in high-strength steel. Steel Construction. 2022; 15(1):43-47. DOI: 10.1002/stco.202100051
23. Shurin A.B., Zinkevich I.V., Mukhin A.V. Comparative analysis of calculation and design of steel structure elements according to TKP EN 1993-1 and SNiP II-23. Bulletin of BrSTU. 2020; 1:23-27. DOI: 10.36773/1818-1212-2020-119-1-23-27 (rus.).
24. Shurin A.B., Mukhin A.V. Experience in designing trusses from bent-welded profiles in accordance with the requirements of EN 1993-1. Everyday structures from metal and wood: collection of scientific works. 2020; 141-149. (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Shuryn .B., Nadolski V.V. Experience of implementation of Eurocodes in the design of steel structures in the Republic of Belarus. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(5):740-751. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.5.740-751