A method of increasing labour productivity in construction
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.8.1365-1372
Abstract
Introduction. The attempt to solve the problem of labour productivity determination is made, the method of increasing it is considered. The representation of labour productivity in the form of a complex system, formed on the basis of the provisions of system engineering in construction, makes it possible to create a decomposition of its components in the form of factors and parameters influencing them.
Materials and methods. Labour productivity as a complex construction system with a large number of subsystems forming it is considered. A mathematical model of labour productivity, formed from factors and parameters influencing them, makes it possible to determine the actual value of labour productivity.
Results. The actual value of labour productivity is proposed to be compared with the normal value — the value that ensures the required labour productivity in construction, its individual type or even the production structure. The subsystems under study are taken as the main factors, each of them is taken as factors affecting labour productivity. Others can be added to them, for example, unification of design solutions or some other factors. Each of the listed factors is characterized by the parameters creating it. As well as the factors, the parameters creating them represent an open subsystem, the content of which is the subject of research. The result is the construction of a mathematical model of labour productivity.
Conclusions. The solution of the direct problem — determination of the actual value of labour productivity based on the value of factors and the parameters influencing them can be carried out for comparison with the normal value of labour productivity and determination of the actual growth of labour productivity. The solution to the inverse problem is to achieve the target labour duration by assigning to the factors and parameters influencing them the values necessary to solve the task.
About the Author
A. A. Lapidus
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Azariy A. Lapidus — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Technology and Organization of Construction Production
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 57192378750, ResearcherID: B-4104-2016
References
1. Salnikov K.E. Reduction of construction time as a result of increase of labor efficiency. Finance and Management. 2021; 4:38-49. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7802.2021.4.34480. EDN XOEDDW. (rus.).
2. Kievskiy L.V., Sergeev A.S. Urban development and labor performance. Housing Construction. 2015; 9:55-59. EDN VCLZRD. (rus.).
3. Andreeva E.A. Analysis of the labour productivity dynamics in construction industry in Russia. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2017; 4(63):243-250. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2017-14-4-243-250. EDN YNZGKM. (rus.).
4. Klyuev V.D., Shchepansky S.B., Panayetova V.V., Zaitsev D.A. Analysis of the results of the implementation of the programs of the centers of competence of the national technology initiative for the first stage of its implementation. Innovatics and Expert Examination. 2022; 1(33):89-94. EDN KYUABY. (rus.).
5. Lapidus A.A. Organizational and technological platform of construction. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2022; 17(4):516-524. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2022.4.516-524. EDN BMHWDX. (rus.).
6. Mishchenko V.Ya., Gorbaneva E.P., Archako-va S.Yu., Dobrosotskikh M.G. Modeling the implementation by teams of a complex of technological processes in organizational and technological design. FES: Finance. Economy. Strategy. 2017; 6:37-43. EDN ZTMWAL. (rus.).
7. Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G., Fedyunina A.A., Zaytsev A.A., Yurevich M.A. Labor productivity in the non-resource sectors of the russian economy: what determines firm-level growth? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021; 3:31-67. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-3-31-67. EDN WSCOBD. (rus.).
8. Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G., Fedyunina A.A., Yurevich M.A., Zaitsev A.A. Factors of labor productivity growth at enterprises in non-resource sectors of the Russian economy. XXI April International Scientific Conference on Problems of Development of Economy and Society. 2020; 60. (rus.).
9. Hanley A., Pérez J.M. Are newly exporting firms more innovative? Findings from matched Spanish innovators. Economics Letters. 2012; 116(2):217-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.006
10. Kancs D., Siliverstovs B. R&D and non-linear productivity growth. Research Policy. 2016; 45(3):634-646. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.001
11. Backman M. Human capital in firms and regions: Impact on firm productivity. Papers in Regional Science. 2014; 93(3):557-576. DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12005
12. Lapidus A.A., Makarov A.N. A risk-based approach to construction control applied by a developer. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2022; 17(2):232-241. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2022.2.232-241. EDN ARPPKP. (rus.).
13. Wu X., Liu Q., Zhang L., Skibniewski M.J., Wang Y. Prospective safety performance evaluation on construction sites. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2015; 78:58-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.003
14. Safaryan G.B. A generalized model of a building system: a critical analysis. Construction: Science and Education. 2021; 11(4):41-47. DOI: 10.22227/2305-5502.2021.4.4. EDN PFGTCK. (rus.).
15. Gusakov A.A., Bogomolov Yu.M., Brekhman A.I., Vaganyan G.A., Vaynshteyn M.S., Vladimirskiy S.R. et al. Construction systems engineering. Moscow, ASV Publishing House, 2004; 320. EDN UBCQYB. (rus.).
16. Glukhova M.G., Shilova N.N., Kiselica E.P. Adoption of the best available technology in terms of the enterprise life cycle. Espacios. 2017; 38(33):32. EDN XNSHUE.
17. Qian F., Zhong W., Du W. Fundamental Theories and Key Technologies for Smart and Optimal Manufacturing in the Process Industry. Engineering. 2017; 3(2):154-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2017.02.011
18. Zagorskaya A.V., Lapidus A.A. Application of expertjudgments methods in scientific research. Determination of the required number of experts. Construction Production. 2020; 3:21-34. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2020_3_21. EDN TKKKCO. (rus.).
19. Kuznetsov E.S. Management of technical systems : textbook. Moscow, 2003; 247. (rus.).
20. Kiselitsa E.P., Shilova N.N., Shelomentsev A.G. Improving the labour productivity of construction organizations in an innovative economy. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2021; 11(1):225-238. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.11.1.111807. EDN HQMMCT. (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Lapidus A.A. A method of increasing labour productivity in construction. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(8):1365-1372. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.8.1365-1372
Views:
513
Email this article 