Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Methodology of evaluating of factors affecting the efficiency of construction project implementation by general contracting organization in Fit-out direction

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.9.1562-1569

Abstract

Introduction. The demand for interior design services (Fit-out) in Russia began to grow actively in recent years, so the research in this area, aimed at improving the efficiency of project implementation, is relevant. Despite the relevance of this direction in our country, in the scientific community the topic of interior design (Fit-out) is touched upon only in the field of BIM modelling. The stages of research on revealing the dependence of the choice of organizational and technological solutions by general contracting organization on the terms of construction project implementation in the direction of Fit-out are presented.

Materials and methods. Literary sources, scientific publications, Internet resources were studied. The analysis of design and estimate, production, organizational and technological, executive, tender, financial and reporting and other documentation, with which the studied factors affecting the efficiency of construction project implementation by general contracting organization in the direction of Fit-out are connected, is carried out.

Results. The dependence of the identified factors and the analyzed documentation is determined. The performance criterion — the period of realization of the construction project Fit-out is established. As a tool for assessing the efficiency of construction project realization “Complex indicator of efficiency of construction project Fit-out” is accepted. The formed system will be the basis for the development of a methodology for determining the efficiency of construction project implementation by the general contracting organization in the direction of Fit-out.

Conclusions. Completed projects are required to be evaluated for achievement of the company’s objectives and quality of work. These evaluations can serve as feedback for future projects and for process improvement. In addition, these evaluations can be used to make adjustments to organizational, technological and management decisions during the construction process to achieve goals.

About the Authors

T. Kh. Bidov
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Tembot Kh. Bidov — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Technologies and Organization of Construction Production, Director of the Scientific and Educational Center “Structures, Technologies and Construction Organization”

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

RSCI AuthorID: 1021788, Scopus: 57195235334, ResearcherID: HKO-9186-2023



A. O. Khubaev
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Alan O. Khubaev — Associate Professor of the Department of Technologies and Organization of Construction Production, leading researcher of the Scientific and Educational Center “Structures, Technologies and Organization of Construction”

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

RSCI AuthorID: 811024, Scopus: 57195226934, ResearcherID: HKO-9157-2023



E. A. Pomytko
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Egor A. Pomytko — postgraduate student of the Department of Testing of Structures

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



A. D. Kotelnikova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Alina D. Kotelnikova — student

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



References

1. Vozgoment N.V. Problems of using digital technologies in the field of Fit-out when organizing business processes of an enterprise. Analysis of the socio-economic state and development prospects of the Russian Federation : materials of the 9th International Student Scientific-practical conference. 2023; 184-188. EDN RBPSEM. (rus.).

2. Zherugov R.A. Organizational and management solutions for Fit-out office real estate development projects. Synergy Sciences. 2020; 54:874-880. EDN PVSYUU. (rus.).

3. Vozgoment N.V. Prospects for the use of BIM technologies in the field of Fit-out when modeling business processes of enterprise organization. Actual problems of management — 2022 : proceedings of the 27th International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2023; 19-23. EDN ZAHMOY. (rus.).

4. Mota P., Machado F., Biotto C., Mota R., Mota B. BIM for production: Benefits and challenges for its application in a design-bid-build project. Annual Confere-nce of the International Group for Lean Construction. 2019. DOI: 10.24928/2019/0243

5. Habib U., Nasir A., Ullah F., Qayyum S., Thaheem M. BIM roles and responsibilities in developing countries: a dedicated matrix for design-bid-build projects. Buildings. 2022; 12(10):1752. DOI: 10.3390/buildings12101752

6. Abou Chakra H., Ashi A. Comparative analysis of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery systems in Lebanon. Journal of Industrial Engineering International. 2019; 15(S1):147-152. DOI: 10.1007/s40092-019-00323-1

7. Bidov T.Kh., Kotelnikova A.D. Systematization of factors affecting the efficiency of the implementation of a construction project by a general contractor in the direction of Fit-out. Izvestiya Tula State University. 2023; 1:270-274. DOI: 10.24412/2071-6168-2023-1-270-274. EDN MKHFGR. (rus.).

8. Makarov A.N. Organizational and technological potential of the construction production of roofing structures of residential multi-storey buildings : dis. … candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, 2018; 180. EDN KYFYKO. (rus.).

9. Murya V.A. Optimization of the organization of the process of erecting structural elements of monolithic buildings based on a complex indicator of the quality of organizational and technical solutions : dis. … candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, 2022; 192. EDN WYTCYJ. (rus.).

10. Fatullaev R.S. Organizational and technological modeling of a comprehensive assessment of the potential for carrying out unscheduled repair work : dis. … candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, 2017; 103. EDN DHVAHY. (rus.).

11. Lapidus A.A. Efficiency potential of management and technical solutions for a construction object. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014; 1:175-180. EDN RTUKMV. (rus.).

12. Bidov T.Kh. Increasing the efficiency of the quality control system for monolithic structures using non-destructive methods when organizing the construction of residential buildings : dis. … candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, 2020; 145. EDN CDZBRF. (rus.).

13. Khubaev A.O. Improving the production process of winter concreting based on the potential of organizational and technical solutions : dis. … candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, 2022; 178. EDN UUSXIE. (rus.).

14. Lapidus A.A., Topchiy D.V., Fatullaev R.S., Shesterikova Ya.V., Bidov T.Kh. Organizational and technological modeling of a comprehensive assessment of the potential for unscheduled repair work. Moscow, ASV Publishing House, 2023; 89. EDN EHCBCN. (rus.).

15. Lapidus A.A., Muria V.A. Comprehensive indicator of quality of organizational-technological decisions in the construction of construction elements of reinforced concrete buildings. Construction Production. 2020; 2:3-9. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2020_2_3. EDN QMABHQ. (rus.).

16. Lapidus A., Khubaev A., Bidov T. Development of a three-tier system of parameters in the formation of the organizational and technological potential of using non-destructive testing methods. E3S Web of Conferences. 2019; 97:06037. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20199706037

17. Khubaev A.O. Determination of the effectiveness of the production process of winter concreting based on field studies. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023; 389:06012. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202338906012

18. Fatullaev R. Organizational-technological modeling of a multi-apartment residential house where overhaul is planned. E3S Web of Conferences. 2019; 97:06035. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20199706035

19. Fatullaev R. Modeling and assessment of a multi-apartment residential house with a planned overhaul. E3S Web of Conferences. 2019; 110:02157. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201911002157

20. Topchiy D., Shatrova A., Yurgaytis A. Inte-grated construction supervision as a tool to reduce the developer’s risks when implementing new and redevelopment projects. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018; 193:05032. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819305032

21. Topchiy D., Bolotova A. Systematization of factors affecting the organizational processes in the conversion of buildings. IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 753(3):032042. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/753/3/032042

22. Oleinik P., Kuzmina T. Modelling the reduction of project making duration. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2017; 117:00129. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201711700129

23. Lapidus A., Topchiy D., Kuzmina T., Bolshakova P. Modelling the stages of pre-project preparation and design development in the life-cycle of an investment and construction project. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(23):12401. DOI: 10.3390/app122312401


Review

For citations:


Bidov T.Kh., Khubaev A.O., Pomytko E.A., Kotelnikova A.D. Methodology of evaluating of factors affecting the efficiency of construction project implementation by general contracting organization in Fit-out direction. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(9):1562-1569. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.9.1562-1569

Views: 327


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)