Investigation of properties of chemical anchor on the basis of epoxy resin
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.10.1617-1628
Abstract
Introduction. With the withdrawal of foreign companies from the Russian market there is a need for domestically produced bonded chemical anchors. The properties of the first fully locally produced bonded anchor UTECH HITRE500 based on epoxy resin are studied.
Materials and methods. Glass transition temperature was determined according to GOST 32618.2–2014 on the TMA Q400 device; bending strength was determined according to GOST 4648–2014, compressive strength — according to GOST 4651–2014; pullout bond strength of adhesive composition to concrete was determined according to GOST R 58387–2019 with the help of Instron 3382 testing machine.
Results. The following characteristics of the bonded anchor were determined during tests: glass transition temperature, bending strength, bending elastic modulus, compressive strength, ultimate resistance of bonding resistance to breakout at operating temperatures: +23, +42, +70, –60 °С, as well as the time for which the chemical anchor gains 97.7 % breakout strength when curing at air temperature –10 °С (10 days). It was established that when the specimens cured for 1 day at room temperature are kept at temperatures of +42 and +70 °С, the ultimate pullout bond strength decreases significantly (by 29.7 and 64.7 % respectively). It was found out that when the specimens cured for 1 day at room temperature, were tested at –60 °С the pullout strength slightly increased compared to the control specimens (4.6 % higher).
Conclusions. The results of tests of the first fully locally produced chemical anchor UTECH HITRE500 are presented. The glass transition temperature and physical and mechanical properties of the cured chemical anchor were determined. The time required for full bond strength gain in conditions of negative temperature –10 °C equal to 10 days was determined.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. A. ShvetsovaRussian Federation
Victoria A. Shvetsova — lecturer at the Department of Construction Materials Science
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
M. G. Kovalev
Russian Federation
Mikhail G. Kovalev — lecturer at the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Topchiy D.V., Katasonova M.A., Yurgaitis A.Yu. Technical standardization of modern methods of conducting construction work during reconstruction, repurposing and technological re-equipment of buildings and structures. Innovation and Investment. 2019; 6:281-285. EDN SKOCBD. (rus.).
2. Bokarev S.A., Murovannyy Y.N., Usoltsev A.M., Murovannyy I.Y. Field and laboratory testing of reinfor-cing construction with steel plates. Naukovedenie. 2013; 3(16):167. EDN QZYAAJ. (rus.).
3. Bondarenko I.N., Malakshin U.N., Kachkov N.A., Bondarenko V.I. The article tells about work of brick facing of modern high-strength building. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2010; 4:43-48. EDN RTUJJF. (rus.).
4. Lyudkovskiy A.M. The Experience of Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Frame by Flat Capitals, Installed on the Top of Slabs. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2015; 4:80-89. EDN TPKORJ. (rus.).
5. Contrafatto L., Cosenza R. Behaviour of post-installed adhesive anchors in natural stone. Construction and Building Materials. 2014; 68:355-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.099
6. Cook R.A. Behavior of Chemically Bonded Anchors. Journal of Structural Engineering. 1993; 119(9):2744-2762. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)07339445(1993)119:9(2744)
7. Cook R.A. Factors influencing bond strength of adhesive anchors. ACI Structural Journal. 2001; 98(1). DOI: 10.14359/10149
8. Cook R.A., Kunz J., Fuchs W., Konz R.C. Behavior and Design of Single Adhesive Anchors under Tensile Load in Uncracked Concrete. ACI Structural Journal. 1998; 95(1). DOI: 10.14359/522
9. Granovsky A.V., Pavlova M.O., Laskevich V.Ch. Evaluation of the strength of embedding metal anchors in brickwork. Earthquake-resistant construction. Safety of structures. 2000; 4:6-7. EDN YTYRGR. (rus.).
10. Granovsky A.V., Pavlova M.O. Study of the strength and deformability of walls made of ceramic bricks in the area of embedding metal anchors. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2001; 10:17-18. EDN YXXQAP. (rus.).
11. Richardson A.E., Dawson S., Campbell L., Moore G., Mc Kenzie C. Temperature Related Pull-out Performance of Chemical Anchor Bolts in Fibre Concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2019; 196:478-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.144
12. Xu C., Shu J., Qi T. Experimental Research on Tensile Properties of Chemical Anchor Bolt Groups after High Temperature. 2022 International Conference on Computational Infrastructure and Urban Planning. 2022; 774:61-68. DOI: 10.1145/3546632.3546881
13. Xu C., Zhou B., Peng S. Experimental Research on Anchoring Performance of Chemical Anchor Bolt in Building Curtain Wall Engineering. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 774(1):012149. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/774/1/012149
14. Sasmal S., Thiyagarajan R., Lieberum K.H., Koenders E.A.B. Numerical simulations of progression of damage in concrete embedded chemical anchors. Computers and Concrete. 2018; 22(4):395-405. DOI: 10.12989/cac.2018.22.4.395
15. Xu C., Gu Y., Peng S. Experimental Research on Anchoring Behavior of Chemical Anchor Bolt under Repeated Loading. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 774(1):012134. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/774/1/012134
16. Lahouar M., Caron J.-F., Pinoteau N., Forêt G., Benzarti K. Mechanical behavior of adhesive anchors under high temperature exposure: experimental investigation. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2017; 78:200-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.07.004
17. Çaliskan Ö., Karakurt C., Aras M., Kaya T. Behaviors of Chemical Anchors Installed in Different Types of Concrete. 2022. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1570263/v1
18. Çaliskan Ö., Aras M. Experimental investigation of behaviour and failure modes of chemical anchorages bonded to concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2017; 156:362-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.179
19. Bajer M., Kala J., Barnat J. Steel chemical members anchored in concrete. VIII International Conference on Computational Plasticity COMPLAS VIII. 2005.
20. Çalışkan Ö., Aras M., Ağdağ Y. Experimental investigations the effects of dusty, humidity and temperature conditions on chemical anchors. Revista de la construcción. 2023; 22(3):613-631. DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.22.3.613
21. Kabantsev O.V., Kovalev M.G. Determination of mechanical characteristics of anchors in damaged concrete base. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2022; 9:57-65. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2022.09.57-65. DN KLZJLO. (rus.).
22. Irzhak V.I. Epoxy polymers and nanocomposites. Chernogolovka, Editorial and Publishing Department of the IPCP RAS, 2021; 319. (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Shvetsova V.A., Kovalev M.G. Investigation of properties of chemical anchor on the basis of epoxy resin. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(10):1617-1628. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.10.1617-1628