Formation of an effective schedule of work during the construction of a monolithic reinforced concrete house

Introduction. The existing principles of construction organization, based on early developments that do not take into account the current situation, to a large extent become an obstacle to the development of the construction industry. The current situation requires the introduction of new approaches in construction management, allowing to adapt to changing economic conditions, and contributing to a reduction in the duration of construction. The task of the study was to develop a project for the organization of work, which allows reducing the time for the construction of a monolithic floor from 14 to 6 working days. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the development of such combinations of various technological stages that made it possible to reduce the duration of construction without violating construction production technologies; to make decisions promptly in a specific situation and maintain full control over the consumption of building materials, possible losses and labour costs not aimed at fulfilling the main tasks, in order to improve the technical and economic indicators of construction.

Materials and methods. Standard technological processes and regulatory documents were studied. It is revealed that the optimization of technological processes and the use of the principles of “lean construction” contributes to reducing labour costs and consumption of building materials, increasing productivity and improving quality; the development and implementation of technology depends on the final goal and task of the project, implies a sequence of decision-making.

Results. In the course of the research, an algorithm for making specific decisions was developed. To achieve this goal, an analysis of the technology of monolithic housing construction was carried out, the moments that have a direct impact on increasing the duration of construction and possible losses were identified, and options for making changes that contribute to solving these problems were proposed.

Conclusions. The proposed work organization system may have great potential in the future, despite its simplicity. The developed technical and technological solutions aimed at a lean attitude in production and organization of construction will greatly contribute to improving the competitiveness of construction companies, reducing the cost of production by reducing direct costs, increasing productivity and improving product quality. The stages of further implementation will be built entirely on the justification and development of a lean construction management model, and steps to implement this system, determining the area of responsibility of each participant.

1. Vumek P.D., Jones D.T. Lean manufacturing: How to get rid of losses and achieve prosperity for your company. 12th ed. Moscow, Priority, 2021; 478. (rus.).

2. Womack J.P., Jones D.T. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Revised and Updated Hardcover. Free Press, 2003; 396.

3. Taiichi O. Toyota Production System. Moving away from mass production. 3rd ed. Moscow, Institute of Integrated Strategic Studies, 2008; 194. (rus.).

4. Taiichi Ohno. Taiichi Ohnos Workplace Management: Special 100th Birthday Edition. McGraw Hill, 2012; 208.

5. Kiselyov I. At the origins of Lean production. 2011. URL: https://tobetter.ru/lean/u-istokov-berezhlivogo-proizvodstva/ (rus.).

6. Arashpour M., Arashpour M. Analysis of workflow variability and its impacts on productivity and performance in construction of multistory buildings. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2015; 31(6). DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000363

7. Lapidus A.A., Demidov L.P. Investigation of the Factors Influencing the Potential Indicator of a Const-ruction Site. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014; 4:160-166. (rus.).

8. Rybnov E.I., Asaul M.A. Formation of integrated structures for the implementation of investment and construction projects. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2008; 3(16):97-101. EDN JVRZAR. (rus.).

9. Bolotin S.A., Biche-ool H.V., Bohan Kh.A., Huraini N.Q.R. Applied aspects of the entropy indicator of the current construction schedule assessment. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022; 4(93):65-72. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2022-19-4-65-72. EDN XVUERA. (rus.).

10. Sacks R. What constitutes good production flow in construction? Construction Management and Economics. 2016; 34(9):641-656. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1200733

11. Lapidus A.A. Efficiency Potential of Management and Technical Solutions for a Construction Object. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014; 1:175-180. (rus.).

12. Lapidus A.A., Stepanov A.E. Formation of organizational and technological parameters of efficiency in construction of cast-in-situ structures of high-rise residential buildings. Science and Business: Ways of Development. 2019; 2(92):128-131. EDN YYTCYX. (rus.).

13. Stepanov A.E. The line production method for in-situ construction of residential buildings. Science and Business: Ways of Development. 2019; 5(95):172-173. EDN MJZYMG. (rus.).

14. Liliana L. A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2016; 161:012099. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/161/1/012099

15. Linnik M., Berghede K. An experiment in takt time planning applied to non-repetitive work. 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. 2013

16. Bolotin S.A., Al-Janabi M.A., Bohan Kh.A. Forecasting of the construction completion based on the modeling of nonlinear dependence on delays of individual works. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022; 2(91):83-90. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2022-19-2-83-90. EDN OGVLBZ. (rus.).

17. Bolotin S.A., Bohan Kh.A. Neutralization of work delays based on the analysis of construction schedules formed by the method of undetermined resource coefficients. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022; 1(90):48-54. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2022-19-1-48-54. EDN QINEIU. (rus.).

18. Yudina A.F., Grigoryev S.Yu., Velichkin V.Z. Using of BIM technologies for quality control of construction infrastructure projects. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2020; 2(79):132-137. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2020-17-2-132-137. EDN NLIPBT. (rus.).

19. Murguia D., Rathnayake A., Middleton C. Master schedule optimisation with the use of flowlines and performance data. Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. 2023; 1463-1474. DOI: 10.24928/2023/0121

20. Rathnayake A., Murguia D., Middleton C. Analysing the impact of construction flow on productivity. Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. 2023. DOI: 10.24928/2023/0172

21. Tommelein I.D., Singh V.V., Coelho R.V., Lehtovaara J. So Many Flows! Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. 2022; 878-889. DOI: 10.24928/2022/0199

22. Murya V.A., Lapidus A.A. The influence of the integrated quality indicator of organizational and technological solutions on structural elements of multi-storey reinforced concrete buildings. Science Prospects. 2018; 9(108):27-30. EDN YIZQSD. (rus.).

23. Petrova T.M., Smirnova O.M. Concrete with increased early strength based on ordinary Portland cement PC 500-DO-N and CEM I 42,5N. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2011; 4(29):91-96. EDN OPBYMD. (rus.).

24. Lapidus A.A. Formation of an Integral Potential of Organizational and Technological Solutions through the Decomposition of the Main Elements of a Construction Project. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2016; 12:114-123. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.12.114-123 (rus.).

25. Belova N.E., Dolgov A.A., Petrov A.A., Toku-nova G.F., Kharitonovich A.V. Modern problems of ma-nagement of the regional investment and construction complex. St. Petersburg, SPbGASU, 2013; 144. EDN TXYNMX. (rus.).