Strategic planning of innovation activities of a construction enterprise in the projection of a system-network approach
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.11.1850-1860
Abstract
Introduction. The need for accelerated innovative development of construction enterprises in conditions of a high level of uncertainty in the external environment and constantly implemented organizational and economic changes determines the creation of new scientific and methodological foundations for strategic planning of innovative activities based on the methodology of the system-network approach.
Materials and methods. Accelerated creation and implementation of innovations necessary to achieve the goals of technological sovereignty, based on the analysis of statistical data, research findings and assessment of advanced foreign experience, is carried out within the framework of a network innovation process with the interaction of many different enterprises and organizations regarding the creation of new construction value products for consumers (value innovation) based on long-term general economic and industry trends set by foresight forecast.
Results. The paper substantiates the feasibility of using a system-network approach when building an innovative strategy for construction enterprises, based on the network nature of interactions between participants in innovative activities in construction. As a result of cognitive analysis and modelling of the main indicators of innovation activity, the drivers of innovative development of a construction enterprise were identified, including the development of strategic partnerships and cooperation links in the innovation and investment network.
Conclusions. A methodology of optimization of network innovative interactions is proposed, the practical application of which increases the efficiency and speed of diffusion of innovations when creating “points of innovative growth”.
About the Authors
I. G. LukmanovaRussian Federation
Inessa G. Lukmanova — Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 655039, Scopus: 57190412717, ResearcherID: B-4128-2016
V. A. Vlasenko
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav A. Vlasenko — Сandidate of Technical Sciences, doctoral student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 895092, Scopus: 57225754557, ResearcherID: GQH-6333-2022
S. S. Uvarova
Russian Federation
Svetlana S. Uvarova — Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 656227, Scopus: 57192670466, ResearcherID: W-4990-2018
References
1. Trabskaja J., Mets T. Ecosystem as the Source of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Foresight and STI Governance. 2019; 13(4):10-22. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.4.10.22
2. Gumba K., Belyaeva S. Specific character of sustainable innovative development of transport construction in self-regulation conditions. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017; 90:012163. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/90/1/012163. EDN ZWGDFD.
3. Kopmann J., Kock A., Killen C.P., Gemünden H.G. The role of project portfolio management in fostering both deliberate and emergent strategy. International Journal of Project Management. 2017; 35(4):557-570. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.011
4. Chen W., Yu M., Hou J. Synergistic Relationship, Agent Interaction, and Knowledge Coupling: Driving Innovation in Intelligent Construction Technology. Buildings. 2024; 14(2):542. DOI: 10.3390/buildings-14020542
5. Gumba K., Belyantseva O., Kochetova L. Justification of the Sources of Forming Competitive Advantages of Underground Construction Companies under the Production Concentration Conditions. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 165:1323-1327. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.858. EDN XGOJWZ.
6. Gumba K., Uvarova S., Belyaeva S., Vlasenko V. Innovations as sustainable competitive advantages in the digital economy: substantiation and forecasting. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021; 244:10011. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202124410011. EDN OLKJIM.
7. Lekan A., Clinton A., Owolabi J. The disruptive adaptations of Construction 4.0 and Industry 4.0 as a pathway to a sustainable innovation and inclusive industrial technological development. Buildings. 2021; 11(3):79. DOI: 10.3390/buildings11030079
8. Walker D.H., Davis P.R., Stevenson A. Coping with uncertainty and ambiguity through team collaboration in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2017; 35(2):180-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.001
9. Zhang X., Le Y., Liu Y., Liu M. Fostering ambidextrous innovation in infrastructure projects: Differentiation and integration tactics of cross-functional teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2021; 147(6). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002060
10. Lo J.T., Kam C. Innovation of organizations in the construction industry: Progress and performance attributes. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2022; 38(6). DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0001093
11. Golov R., Smirnov V., Narezhnaya T., Ovsyannikova A., Zhutaeva E., Sizova E. et al. Adaptation of industrial and energy enterprises to the implementation of the concept of open innovation. E3S Web of Conferences. 2019; 110:02130. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201911002130. EDN FWLUHS.
12. Bivand R. Spatial diffusion and spatial statistics: Revisting hägerstrand’s study of innovation diffusion. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2015; 27:106-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.103
13. Bhatti S.H., Zakariya R., Vrontis D., Santoro G., Christofi M. High-performance work systems, innovation and knowledge sharing. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 2020; 43(2):438-458. DOI: 10.1108/ER-10-2019-0403
14. Ding X., Feng L., Huang Y., Li W. The interactive effects of communication network structure and organizational size on task performance in project-based organizations: The mediating role of bootleg innovation behavior. Buildings. 2024; 14(1):98. DOI: 10.3390/buildings14010098
15. Tipili L.G., Ojeba P.O., Ilyasu M.S. Evaluating the effects of communication in construction project delivery in Nigeria. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2014; 2(5):48-54.
16. Shi Q., Chen X., Xiao C., Han Y. Network perspective in megaproject management : а systematic review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2022; 148(7). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002304
17. Adner R. Ecosystem as Structure. Journal of Management. 2017; 43(1):39-58. DOI: 10.1177/0149206316678451
18. Sizova E., Zhutaeva E., Gorshkov R. Methodical bases for forming the structure of management of innovative activity of large building holdings. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018; 170:01126. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817001126
19. Wang N., Gong Z., Xu Z., Liu Z., Han Y. A quantitative investigation of the technological innovation in large construction companies. Technology in Society. 2021; 65:101533. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101533
20. Vlasenko V.A. Formation of sustainable competitive advantages in the development of a construction company strategy based on value innovation. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2023; 3:37-41. DOI: 10.22337/2073-8412-2023-3-37-41. EDN BZTQPD.
21. Sörlin S. Hägerstrand as historian: innovation, diffusion and the processual landscape. Landscape Research. 2020; 45(6):712-723. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2020.1790506
22. Tyapukhin A.P. Logistics and supply chain management: a new sight. Deutschland, Saarbrücken, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012; 127.
23. Gumba K., Belyantseva O., Kochetova L. Justification of the sources of forming competitive advantages of underground construction companies under the production concentration conditions. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 165:1323-1327. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.858. EDN XGOJWZ.
24. Yaskova N., Kolosova T. The investment and construction activities transformation at the modern development stage of Russia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 869(6):062050. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/6/062050
Review
For citations:
Lukmanova I.G., Vlasenko V.A., Uvarova S.S. Strategic planning of innovation activities of a construction enterprise in the projection of a system-network approach. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(11):1850-1860. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.11.1850-1860