Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Study of structural changes in the territorial development of the republic of Tatarstan

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.12.1990-2000

Abstract

Introduction. The concentration of population and economic activity in agglomerations is primarily due to comfortable living conditions and developed infrastructure. At the same time, the issues of housing development in recent years have gone beyond the discussion of the problems of development of the construction industry and have become the subject of spatial development research. Housing stock and infrastructure facilities in the periphery do not correspond to demographic and migration processes. Thus, there is a need to develop analytical tools capable of planning a balanced infrastructure of the region.

Materials and methods. Two research methods were used to investigate the set tasks: 1) studying the dynamics of key indicators of the region’s development; 2) calculation of the value of indices reflecting the concentration of the studied indicator (Herfindahl – Hirschman index — for the volume of housing construction, population concentration and the number of jobs; concentration coefficient of economic activity indicators).

Results. The analysis of the main factors has shown that the long-term growth of the share of the population older than working age occurs in parallel with the growth of the population younger than working age. This imbalance is certainly the achievement of the state’s priorities in the field of improving the quality of life of the population through the introduction of social support measures for elderly citizens and young families. In agglomerations, jobs are technological and productivity is higher. Residence in the metropolitan area is considered not only as a place of work but also as a comfortable place to live.

Discussion and Conclusion. The study of the regions of the Republic of Tatarstan allowed to show a complex situation with spatial development of the region — concentration in agglomerations and destruction on the periphery. In this regard, the study of agglomeration processes should become one of the elements of the national regional policy.

About the Authors

S. G. Sternik
Institute of Economic Forecasting of Russian Academy of Sciences (IEF RAS); Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Sergey G. Sternik — Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher; Professor; Professor

47 Nakhimovskiy prospect, Moscow, 117418;
49/2 Leningradsky Ave., Moscow, 125167
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



I. F. Gareev
Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering (KSUAE)
Russian Federation

Ilnur F. Gareev — candidate of economic sciences, associate professor

Zelenaya st., Kazan, 420043



A. M. Nasrutdinov
Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering (KSUAE)
Russian Federation

Arslan M. Nasrutdinov — postgraduate student

Zelenaya st., Kazan, 420043



References

1. Atayeva A.G., Ulyayeva A.G. Interterritorial interaction in strategic planning documents (by the materials of the Volga Federal District regions). PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin. 2023; 1:176-191. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2023.1.13. EDN JOMAFY. (rus.)

2. Wulfovich R.M. Problems of cooperation and coordination in multi-level management systems of large cities in the context of digitalization. Russia: Trends and Prospects : yearbook. Materials of the XIX National Scientific Conference with international participation, Moscow, 18-19 December 2019 / ored. ed. V.I. Gerasimov. Moscow, INION RAS, 2020; 15(1):650-655. EDN LMODME. (rus.).

3. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V., Petrosian A.N. Spatial Patterns of Net Migration in the Suburbs of Russian Regional Centers. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2021; 6:123-134. (rus.).

4. Melnikova L.V. Efficiency of large cities: Theory and empirics. Economic issues. 2023; 3:83-101. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-3-83-101 (rus.).

5. Eremenko M.M., Gareev I.F. Research on the relationship between housing construction and sustainable development of territories. Russian Journal of Housing Research. 2019; 6(3):333-376. DOI: 10.18334/zhs.6.3.41188 (rus.).

6. Zakirova Y.A., Sagdiev A.R. Features of urban development of urban-type settlements in the structure of the Kazan agglomeration. News KSUAE. 2022; 3(61):130-146. DOI: 10.52409/20731523_2022_3_130. EDN FDMELF. (rus.).

7. Kolomak E.A., Sherubneva A.I. Assessment of the Significance of Agglomeration Effects in the South of Siberia. Spatial Economics. 2023; 19(1):52–69. DOI: 10.14530/se.2023.1.052-069. EDN LKIHHU. (rus.).

8. Makhrova A.G., Safronov S.G., Abilov A.Z. Urban agglomerations of Kazakhstan: tendencies of socio-economic development. Izvestia of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical series. 2023; 87(1):16-28. DOI: 10.31857/S2587556623010119. EDN LKERDP. (rus.).

9. Batunova E., Gunko M. Urban shrinkage: an unspoken challenge of spatial planning in Russian small and medium-sized cities. European Planning Studies. 2018; 26(8):1580-1597. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1484891

10. Gao J., O’Neill B.C. Data-driven spatial modeling of global long-term urban land development: The SELECT model. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2019; 119:458-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.015

11. Matveeva E.S. Kazan residential real estate market: developers’ targets and consumer preferences. Russian Journal of Housing Research. 2022; 9(4):353-376. DOI: 10.18334/zhs.9.4.116426 (rus.).

12. Ryndina A.O., Svishcheva V.A. Financial aspects of the Saratov agglomeration development. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law. 2023; 23(1):42-47. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-1-42-47. EDN DBSYCU. (rus.).

13. Novokreschenov A.V., Morozova T.Yu. Urban agglomeration in the unified system of the public authority (Based on the results of the survey of the heads of the rural settlements of the Novosibirsk region). Territory Development. 2023; 1(31):35-42. DOI: 10.32324/2412-8945-2023-1-35-42. EDN NCSVQN. (rus.).

14. Busygina I.M., Sagitova L.V. Agglomerations, cluster policy and economic growth in Russia (case of the Republic of Tatarstan). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. 2020; 14(2):5-14. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-5-14. EDN BETKNM. (rus.).

15. Suvorova A.V. Guidelines for Spatial Development of the Region: the Case of the Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk Regions. Transbaikal State University Journal. 2023; 29(1):74-83. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2023-29-1-74-83. EDN QLUGJF. (rus.).

16. Kulkov A.A., Vashurkin E.D. Impact of transportation infrastructure on the area’s urban value. Russian Journal of Housing Research. 2023; 10(3):191-210. DOI: 10.18334/zhs.10.3.118991 (rus.).

17. Stupnikova E.A. How to improve the use of investment in road construction. Real estate: economy, management. 2010; 3-4:91-93. EDN MWKGVX. (rus.).

18. Srisawat P., Kronprasert N., Arunotayanun K. Development of Decision Support System for Evaluating Spatial Efficiency of Regional Transport Logistics. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017; 25:4832-4851. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.493

19. Zima A.G. Model of the sub-center of the St. Petersburg agglomeration (by the example of the village of Novosaratovka). Development concept of the city center. Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2023; 3:67-83. DOI: 10.34031/2071-7318-2022-8-3-67-83. EDN HFCODB. (rus.).

20. Zotov V.B. Development and decline of Russian cities: reasons and possible solutions. 2023; (2):41-47. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2023-2-41-47. EDN SFHMZN. (rus.).

21. Markwart E., Sosnin D.P., Nechaeva S.V. Evaluating the effectiveness of metropolitan area management: theoretical and practical aspects. Region: Economics and Sociology. 2023; 1(117):44-81. DOI: 10.15372/REG20230102. EDN DZIVLX. (rus.).

22. Borovskoy A.E., Smirnova A.Y., Perkova M.V., Smirnov K.L., Berdnikov M.N. Pendulum migration flows of the Belgorod agglomered territory. Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2023; 2:53-66. DOI: 10.34031/2071-7318-2022-8-2-53-66. EDN OCNNPU. (rus.).

23. Śanchez-Romero M., Ediev D., Feichtinger G., Prskawetz A. How many old people have ever lived? Demographic Research. 2017; 36(1):1667-1702. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.54

24. Oliveira E., Hersperger A.M. Governance arrangements, funding mechanisms and power configurations in current practices of strategic spatial plan implementation. Land Use Policy. 2018; 76:623-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.042

25. Glinskiy V., Serga L., Khvan M. Assessment of Environmental Parameters Impact on the Level of Sustainable Development of Territories. Procedia CIRP. 2016; 40:625-630. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.145

26. Verstina N.G., Iskandarov D.Z. Realization of state policy on the basis of projects for construction of industrial facilities in special economic zones. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of the Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2023; 18(10):1627-1646. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2023.10.1627-1646 (rus.).

27. Saveleva N.K., Sozinova A.A., Makarova T.V., Shpengler A.V., Barmina E.A. Normative and legal problems of regulating the agglomeration creation and activity at the regional level. Journal of Economics, entrepreneurship and law. 2023;13(3):733-746. DOI: 10.18334/epp.13.3.117394


Review

For citations:


Sternik S.G., Gareev I.F., Nasrutdinov A.M. Study of structural changes in the territorial development of the republic of Tatarstan. Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(12):1990-2000. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.12.1990-2000

Views: 137


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)