Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Quantitative assessment of dolomite powder suffusion resistance in karstological prognosis

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.1.84-94

Abstract

Introduction. In construction, a large number of objects are erected in conditions where the foundation consists of carbonate rocks that are destroyed to the state of powder. The paper provides materials on the planning, preparation and conduct of a laboratory experimental test for dolomite powder lying at the base of a building in the Kazan. The experiment is presented to quantify the suffusion resistance of powder.

Materials and methods. The study of the suffusion resistance of dolomite powder was carried out using a special filtration-suffusion device. When planning and preparing the experiment, all the main factors were simultaneously taken into account. For mechanical suffusion, these are the physical and filtration characteristics of the rock, its stress-strain state (SSS) and also the volume of the receiving zone for the suffusion products carried out by the filtration flow. For chemical suffusion these are the chemical composition and condition of the rock, the chemical composition and speed of water movement.

Results. It was established that dolomite powder is not subject to the dissolution process, therefore it is classified as eluvial soil and not as karst rock. In terms of mechanical suffusion stability, a comparison was made of the results of analytical solutions and experimental tests, according to which in the first case the dolomite powder is suffusion, and in the second — practically non-suffusion.

Conclusions. The construction site is classified as non-hazardous in terms of karst and karst-suffusion. At the same time, mechanical suffusion not related to karst cannot be excluded. When assessing the suffusion resistance of dolomite powder, it is recommended to use the rate of mechanical or complex (chemical-mechanical) suffusion instead of the rate of rock dissolution. In the future it is recommended to use the obtained value when predicting the size of suffusion deformations.

About the Authors

M. M. Utkin
Geo Palitra
Russian Federation

Mikhail M. Utkin — Candidate of Technical Science; chief specialist of karstological research

P 53 room, 3 Kostina st., Nizhny Novgorod, 603000

RSCI AuthorID: 857594, ResearcherID: КМ-4828-2024



T. A. Utkina
Mining Institute of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences is a branch of the Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Tatyana A. Utkina — Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Researcher at the Laboratory of Geo-logy of Mineral Deposits

78А Sibirskaya st., Perm, 614007

RSCI AuthorID: 40720, Scopus: 36641978900, ResearcherID: JBB-2684-2023



References

1. Bischoff J.L., Julia R., Shanks W.C., Rosenbauer R.J. Karstification without carbonic acid: Bedrock dissolution by gypsum-driven dedolomitization. Geology. 1994; 22(11):995. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0995:kwcabd>2.3.co;2

2. Drever J.I., Stillings L.L. The role of organic acids in mineral weathering. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 1997; 120:167-181. DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(96)03720-x

3. Gabet E.J., Edelman R., Langner H. Hydrological controls on chemical weathering rates at the soil-bedrock interface. Geology. 2006; 34(12):1065. DOI: 10.1130/G23085A.1

4. Dong X., Cohen M., Martin J.B., McLaughlin D.L., Murray A.B., Ward N.D. et al. Ecohydrologic processes and soil thickness feedbacks control limestone-weathering rates in a karst Landscape. Chemical Geology. 2019; 527:118774. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.05.021

5. Gao J., Chen G., Wang Z., Li L., Mitani Y., Li C. et al. Numerical modeling of the failure process of the heterogeneous karst rock mass using the DDA–SPH method. Underground Space. 2023; 13:1-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.02.015

6. Jin W., Qiu Z., Zhang D. Experimental study on the influence evaluation of deep alluvium foundation suffusion on soil skeleton deformation in Luding Hydropower Station foundation. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2023; 2-11.

7. Zhang X., Benamar A., Oueidat M., Luo Y. Experimental study on suffusion and contact erosion in double-layered alluvial foundation with a cut-off wall. Acta Geotechnica. 2023; 18(11):6077-6095. DOI: 10.1007/s11440-023-02033-w

8. Latypov A., Zharkova N., Ter-Martirosyan A. Calculation of the stress-strain state of soil massifs with karst-suffusion cavities. IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering. 2018; 365:042058. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/365/4/042058

9. Strokova L.A., Leonova A.V. Assessment of suffosion hazard on the territory of Tomsk. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2021; 332(5):49-59. DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2021/05/3185. EDN CVPEGR. (rus.).

10. Latypov A.I., Garaeva A.N., Luneva O.V. Characteristics of the suffosion hazard of the territory of the Bugulma plateau of the Bugulma-Belebey upland. Gruntovedenie. 2022; 1(18):3-42. DOI: 10.53278/2306-9139-2022-1-18-31-42. EDN PTKQCD. (rus.).

11. Savarensky I.A., Mironov N.A. Guide to engineering-geological surveys in areas of karst development. Moscow, PNIIIS, 1995; 167. (rus.).

12. Khomenko V.P. Antikarst and antisuffosion protection in Russia: history and present situation. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2018; 13(4):482-489. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2018.4.482-489. EDN XOUHHF. (rus.).

13. Utkin M.M., Utkin M.V. Assessment of suffosion stability of chalky rocks when their water saturation with atmospheric precipitation. Hydrogeology and Karstology : interuniversity collection of scientific papers. 2023; 119-128. EDN AIDIIZ. (rus.).

14. Zharkova N.I. Patterns of formation of engineering-geological conditions of the city of Kazan : PhD thesis. Ekaterinburg, 2006; 197. (rus.).

15. Bolikhovskaya N.S. Evolution of the loess-soil formation of Northern Eurasia. Moscow, Moscow University Publishing House, 1995; 270. (rus.).

16. Muravyov F.A., Zharkova N.I., Latypov A.I. Carbonate eluvium on the territory of Kazan. Engineering Geology. 2013; 4:34-42. EDN RMUAUZ. (rus.).

17. Hydrogeological and engineering-geological conditions of the city of Kazan / scientific. ed. Shevelev A.A. Kazan, Kazan University Publishing House, 2012; 236. (rus.).

18. Rodionov N.V. Engineering-geological research in karst areas during the construction of small reservoirs, civil and industrial construction : methodological instructions. Moscow, Gosgeoltekhizdat Publ., 1958; 183. (rus.).

19. Naumenko V.G. Laboratory studies of gypsum leachability. Scientific works of the Leningrad Engineering and Construction Institute. Vol. 18. Issues of soil mechanics. 1954; 143-158. (rus.).

20. Utkin M.M., Utkin M.V. Practical experience of determining the dissolution rate of karst rocks in laboratory conditions at one of the sections of “Kazan – Ekaterinburg” high-speed highway. Speleology and Spelestology. 2023; 2:83-88. EDN UOTOKI. (rus.).


Review

For citations:


Utkin M.M., Utkina T.A. Quantitative assessment of dolomite powder suffusion resistance in karstological prognosis. Vestnik MGSU. 2025;20(1):84-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.1.84-94

Views: 131


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)