Normative methods and numerical modelling in determining the design waves for port hydraulic structures
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.1.95-107
Abstract
Introduction. The importance of using composite modelling in the design of wave loads and impacts on port hydraulic structures, namely determining the parameters of design waves, is pointed out. The regulatory documents intended to calculate the permissible values of wave elements for the safe servicing of ships at the berth, some shortcomings are noted, some of which are described in this paper.
Materials and methods. Two objects are used as examples: the Western transport and logistics hub, designed in the Kola Bay of the Barents Sea (where the SWAN wind wave model and the COASTOX-CUR model of currents and water levels were used for numerical modelling, calculations by the analytical method were performed according to SR 38.13330.2018) and the Multifunctional Cargo Area located in the Terpeniya Bay of the Sea of Okhotsk (where calculations were carried out in the SWAN wind wave model and the SWASH long-wave model). For the first case, wave values at control points were used. In the second case, two calculation models were used to determine the influence of the vessel on the wave field — simplified and numerical ones.
Results. For the first example, the differences in the values of waves with and without reflection were analyzed using the analytical method. For the second, the modelling results are presented — the field of significant wave heights for a simplified wall with and without a vessel with a table of control point values. Modelling of a vessel in a mooring pocket is shown through pictures of instantaneous marks of the rough surface and the field of significant heights with the output of control point values. An analysis of the obtained height values in paintings with and without a vessel was performed.
Conclusions. Analysis of two problems showed that the determination of acceptable wave elements at the berth for the safe servicing of ships, carried out in accordance with current regulatory documents, can lead to contradictions, namely the initial data for calculations and a significant change in the wave fields of the port water area when the wave interacts with the moored vessel. As a consequence, this affects the final conclusion about the safe interaction of ships with berth structures.
About the Authors
I. G. KantrazhiRussian Federation
Izmail G. Kantrazhi — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Hydraulics and Hydraulic Engineering
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
A. G. Gogin
Russian Federation
Alexander G. Gogin — Candidate of Technical Sciences, leading specialist
46 Varshavskoe shosse, Moscow, 115230
Zh. I. Nagornova
Russian Federation
Zhanna I. Nagornova — postgraduate student of the Department of Hydraulics and Hydraulic Engineering
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Gerritsen H., Sutherland J., Deigaard R., Sumer M., Fortes C.J.E.M., Sierra J.P. et al. Composite modelling of interactions between beaches and structures. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2011; 49(sup1):2-14. DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2011.589134
2. Gerritsen H., Sutherland J., Santos J.A., Boo-gaard H., Caires S., Deigaard R. et al. Composite modelling. Guide to Physical Modelling and Experimentation: Experience of the HYDRALAB Network. 2011.
3. Kantarzhi I., Anshakov A. Interactive numerical model of hydrometeorologic factors in Kola Bay. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021; 263:03016. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202126303016
4. Anshakov A.S., Kantarzhi I.G. Verification of the numerical hydrodynamic model of the Kola bay. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2021; 16(4):473-485. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2021.4.473-485. EDN WFGZVW. (rus.).
5. Afremov A.S., Kulikova A.N., Smolina N.A. Ensuring the safety of moored large-tonnage vessel parking in conditions of wind and waves. Transactions of the Krylov Shipbuilding Research Institute. 2011; 59(343):109-122. EDN NQYKWJ. (rus.).
6. Holthuijsen L.H. Waves in oceanic and coastal waters. Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511618536
7. Booij N., Haagsma I.J., Holthuijsen L., Kieftenburg A., Ris R., van der Westhuysen A. et al. SWAN Cycle III version 40.51: user manual. 2004.
8. Hasselmann K., Barnett T.P., Bouws E., Wal-den H. Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Ergnzungsheft zur Deutschen Hydrographischen Zeitschrift Reihe. 1973; 12:95.
9. Aelbrecht D. ARTEMIS 3.0: A finite element model for predicting wave agitation in coastal areas and harbours including dissipation. Computer Modelling of Seas and Coastal Regions III. 1997; 30:343-352. DOI: 10.2495/CE970331
10. Berkhoff J.C.W. Computation of combined refraction — diffraction. Coastal Engineering 1972. 1972; 471-490. DOI: 10.1061/9780872620490.027
11. Berkhoff J.C. Mathematical models for simple harmonic linear water waves: wave diffraction and refraction. Delft, Hydraulic Laboratory, 1976; 102.
12. Hervouet J.M. TELEMAC, a hydroinformatic system. La Houille Blanche. 1999; 85(3-4):21-28. DOI: 10.1051/lhb/1999029
13. Kofoed-Hansen H., Sloth P., Sørensen O.R., Fuchs J. Combined numerical and physical modelling of seiching in exposed new marina. Coastal Engineering 2000. 2001; 3600-3614. DOI: 10.1061/40549(276)281
14. Smit P., Stelling G., Zijlema M. Assessment of non-hydrostatic wave-flow model SWASH for directionally spread waves propagating through a barred basin. ACOMEN 2011. 2011.
15. Rijnsdorp D.P., Smit P.B., Zijlema M. Non-hydrostatic modelling of infragravity waves using SWASH. Coastal Engineering Proceedings. 2012; 33:27. DOI: 10.9753/icce.v33.currents.27
16. Zijlema M., Stelling G., Smit P. SWASH: An ope-rational public domain code for simulating wave fields and rapidly varied flows in coastal waters. Coastal Engineering. 2011; 58(10):992-1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.05.015
17. Divinsky B.V., Kosyan R.D., Kuklev S.B. Parameters of wind waves on the protected water areas. Fundamental and Applied Hydrophysics. 2010; 3(4):5-16. EDN NCCVAV. (rus.).
18. Dikiy P.V., Dzyuba N.N., Zheleznyak M.I., Sorokin M.V. Modeling of wave climate of Imeretinsky lowland coast. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2011; 7(2):54-63. EDN PZEXEN. (rus.).
19. Galenin B.G., Kuznecov V.V. Modeling of wave transformation in the coastal zone. Water Resources. 1980; 1:156-165. (rus.).
20. Warner J.C., Geyer W.R., Lerczak J.A. Numerical modeling of an estuary: a comprehensive skill assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 2005; 110(C5). DOI: 10.1029/2004JC002691
21. Warner J.C., Geyer W.R., Arango H.G. Using a composite grid approach in a complex coastal domain to estimate estuarine residence time. Computers & Geosciences. 2010; 36(7):921-935. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.11.008
Review
For citations:
Kantrazhi I.G., Gogin A.G., Nagornova Zh.I. Normative methods and numerical modelling in determining the design waves for port hydraulic structures. Vestnik MGSU. 2025;20(1):95-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.1.95-107