Experimental study of the strength and endurance of glued timber on shearing, compression and bending
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.3.394-408
Abstract
Introduction. Nowadays wood is regaining its position as a material for bridges. During the first decades of the 21st century, the share of wooden bridge construction in Russia increased from 10 to 40 %. The cost of a bridge span made of glued laminated timber is 30–50 % lower than the cost of a bridge span made of precast prestressed reinforced concrete structures. Consequently, an urgent task of modern bridge construction is to expand the scope of application of glued lam-inated timber for complex and extended structures. This requires updating existing and de-veloping new regulatory documents, which, in turn, is impossible without experimental stud-ies of the actual operation of elements of building structures made of glued laminated timber.
Materials and methods. The endurance limit of glued timber specimens during shearing along the fibres and com-pression across the fibres, the endurance limit of glued timber beams during bending, and control of the residual strength of specimens that did not fail after cyclic testing were studied.
Results. Statistical processing of experimental results allowed us to identify the features of defor-mation and destruction of glued timber: the endurance limit for cyclic bending is up to 10 times higher than the endurance limit for cyclic shearing and compression, which once again emphasizes the high level of anisotropy of the material. This is significantly more than for other building materials.
Conclusions. Static tests showed practically uniform linear operation of glued specimens during compres-sion tests across the fibres. Analysis of destruction allowed us to draw a conclusion about the reliability of adhesive joints. It was found that with an increase in humidity by 1 %, the strength decreases by 0.4 %. Consequently, for bridge structures, the issues of moisture re-sistance of glued timber remain relevant. The results of the studies were used in the develop-ment of national standards projects.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. N. ShuvalovRussian Federation
Aleksandr N. Shuvalov — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Testing of Structures
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 737861, Scopus: 7005121558, ResearcherID: MBW-0293-2025
O. A. Kornev
Russian Federation
Oleg A. Kornev — Deputy Director of the Research Institute of Experimental Mechanics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 878952, Scopus: 57204881147
V. A. Kakusha
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Kakusha — Head of the Laboratory for Testing Construction Materials, Products and Structures of the Research Institute of Experimental Mechanics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 877806, Scopus: 57204878011, ResearcherID: AER-2849-2022
Yu. A. Zhidkov
Russian Federation
Yuri A. Zhidkov — engineer of the laboratory for testing building materials, products and structures of the Research Institute of Experimental Mechanics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 1169277, ResearcherID: HHC-1653-2022
A. V. Kornilova
Russian Federation
Anna V. Kornilova — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Research Institute of Experimental Mechanics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 7004499009, ResearcherID: U-3353-2017
V. A. Ermakov
Russian Federation
Valentin A. Ermakov — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher at the Research Institute of Experimental Mechanics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 671368, Scopus: 57202806137, ResearcherID: AFZ-4645-2022
D. E. Kapustin
Russian Federation
Dmitrii E. Kapustin — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 57204881560
M. V. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Maxim V. Fedorov — Head of the Laboratory of Field Testing at the Research Institute of Experimental Mechanics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 58805651700, ResearcherID: KGL-6252-2024
A. V. Nasonovskiy
Russian Federation
Aleksey V. Nasonovskiy – Chief Project Engineer, Design Department of Artificial Structures
room H/6H, litera A, 1, Podjezdnoy per., St. Petersburg, 190013
References
1. Stukov V.P. Development of timber bridges and their use in north situations. Regional aspects of development of science and education in the field of architecture, construction, land management and cadastres at the beginning of the III millennium : proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference. 2019; 316-321. EDN DNPGEH. (rus.).
2. Sokolov A.Yu. Review of foreign and domestic historiography of the study of medieval wooden bridges. Actual archeology 7 : materials of the international scientific conference of young scientists. 2024; 399-401. EDN XVQPKE. (rus.).
3. Pod”yapol’skaya M. A., Verbitskiy I.O., Verbitskaya E.V. Bridge construction using wood in the past and now. Polzunovsky almanac. 2022; 1:168-170. EDN QVUMAT. (rus.).
4. Mishchenko D.S. Review of wooden bridge construction in Russia. Innovative methods of designing building structures of buildings and structures : collection of scientific papers of the 4th All-Russian scientific and practical conference. 2022; 363-366. EDN GGUIXY. (rus.).
5. Pogoreltsev A.A., Turkovsky S.B. Features of application of glulam structures in seismic areas. Structural Mechanics and Calculation of Structures. 2022; 2(301):31-38. DOI: 10.37538/0039-2383.2022.2.31.38. EDN YHQJAE. (rus.).
6. Turkovskiy S.B., Pogoreltsev A.A., Stoyanov V.O. Experience in the operation of large-span laminated timber structures with TSNIISK system nodes. Structural Mechanics and Calculation of Structures. 2022; 6(305):61-68. DOI: 10.37538/0039-2383.2022.6.61.68. EDN EEXUNC. (rus.).
7. Pogoreltsev A.A., Turkovskii S.B. Glued wood lenticular trusses design features, testing, structural analysis and application. Structural Mechanics and Calculation of Structures. 2021; 2(295):62-72. DOI: 10.37538/0039-2383.2021.2.62.72. EDN RMZBNQ. (rus.).
8. Masalov A.V., Kabanov V.А., Masalov N.А. Fracture toughness оf bended elements of glued laminated timber. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Engineering and Technology. 2012; 2-3:229-232. EDN RSFKNL. (rus.).
9. Utkin V.A. Improvement of the structures of superstructures of road bridges made of glued timber : thesis of the degree of doctor of technical sciences. Omsk, 2009; 233. EDN QFETPZ. (rus.).
10. Kobzev P.N. Improving the design and calculation methodology of a multi-ribbed span structure of a bridge made of glued laminated timber, taking into account the joint work of a cross-timber slab and beams : thesis of candidate of technical sciences. Omsk, 2006; 165. (rus.).
11. Mahnert K.C., Hundhausen U. A review on the protection of timber bridges. Wood Material Science & Engineering. 2018; 13(3):152-158. DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2017.1403955
12. Fiore А., Liuzzi M.A., Greco R. Some shape, durability and structural strategies at the conceptual design stage to improve the service life of a timber bridge for pedestrians. Applied Sciences. 2023; 10(6):2023. DOI: 10.3390/app10062023
13. Hawryszkow P., Biliszczuk J. Vibration serviceability of footbridges made of the sustainable and eco structural material: Glued-laminated wood. Materials. 2022; 15(4):1529. DOI: 10.3390/ma15041529
14. Bergenudd J., Battini J.M., Crocetti R. Dynamic analysis of a pedestrian timber truss bridge at three construction stages. Structures. 2024; 59:105763. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105763
15. Toyoda A., Honda H., Kato S. Static and dynamic structural performance of modern timber bridges. Journal of JSCE. 2020; 8(1):26-34. DOI: 10.2208/journal-ofjsce.8.1_26
16. Garcia-Dieguez M., Racic V., Zapico-Valle J.L. Complete statistical approach to modelling variable pedestrian forces induced on rigid surfaces. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2021; 159:107800. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107800
17. Song Z. Discussion on Human-induced Vibration of Glulam Pedestrian Arch Bridge. Academic Journal of Science and Technology. 2024; 13(1):181-184. DOI: 10.54097/f7kw8d13
18. Tazarv M., Carnahan Z., Wehbe N. Glulam timber bridges for local roads. Engineering Structures. 2019; 188:11-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.012
19. Cerda F.C., Goulas C., Sabirov I., Papaefthymiou S., Monsalve A., Petrov R.H. Microstructure, Texture and Mechanical Properties in a Low Carbon Steel after Ultrafast Heating. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2016; 672:108-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.056
20. Ermakov V., Stepanova E. Moisture content and its influence on glued timber structures. IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 869(5):052015. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/5/052015
Review
For citations:
Shuvalov A.N., Kornev O.A., Kakusha V.A., Zhidkov Yu.A., Kornilova A.V., Ermakov V.A., Kapustin D.E., Fedorov M.V., Nasonovskiy A.V. Experimental study of the strength and endurance of glued timber on shearing, compression and bending. Vestnik MGSU. 2025;20(3):394-408. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.3.394-408