Realization of state policy on the basis of projects for construction of industrial facilities in special economic zones

Introduction. The current economic conditions in the Russian Federation have significantly changed the priorities of state policy in the field of industrial development, which is expressed in the provision of an effective policy of spatial planning and creation of industrial facilities in regions where there are favourable conditions for this. One of the directions of
the implementation of these policy priorities is the use of special economic zones (SEZ) with technological infrastructure for the implementation projects for the construction of industrial facilities on their territories. In this regard, it is relevant to develop a set of methods that contribute implementation of state policy in the field of industry, which will provide an objective assessment of prospects for the implementation of industrial construction projects in the SEZ, considering their advantages for the participants of the investment and construction process.

Materials and methods. The initial materials of the study were the data of official statistics of the Russian Federation, characterizing investment processes in the industrial sector of the country. The methodological basis of the work was
the provisions of theories of infographic modelling, functional systems, and statistical research methods — regression and correlation analysis, which are aimed at establishing the significance of indicators affecting the effectiveness of management and prospects for implementation of industrial construction projects in the SEZ.

Results. As a result of the research, a set of indicators characterizing the prospects for implementation of industrial construction projects in the SEZ based on a comprehensive analysis of the project environment that surrounds it was formed. Analytical dependencies of the performance indicators of investment and construction organizations carrying out the construction of industrial facilities were established and formalized, allowing to determine the closeness of connection of these indicators and under conditions of variability of their values, which formed the basis of the developed set of evaluation methods.

Conclusions. The developed approach to assessing the prospects for implementation of industrial construction projects in the SEZ allows expanding the information base for making managerial decisions when choosing locations for new industrial facilities, based on the specification of the conditions for implementation of project activities by its participants, established in the regions of the country. Improving of the state statistics data system in the proposed directions can expand the representativeness and range of analytics for decision-making.

1. Gulyaeva V.B. Technological special economic zones as an spatial development instrument of the Russian economy. Innovations. 2019; 9(251):79-84. DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2019.251.9.012. EDN DHNOUP. (rus.).

2. Sivash O.S. Special economic zones and their impact on the sustainable development of the investment process. Scientific Bulletin: finance, banks, investments. 2018; 4(45):142-152. EDN VPIUAC. (rus.).

3. Minnigalieva I.I., Abzalova G.R., Akhmetzyanov I.A. Special economic zones as a form of public-private partnership. Alley of Science. 2020; 1(5):707-711. EDN FPMUZB. (rus.).

4. Bulavko O.A. Special economic zones as a catalyst for the development of Russian industry. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2020; 10(4):987-996. DOI: 10.18334/epp.10.4.100775. EDN JNYZTO. (rus.).

5. Zubick V.P. Special economic zones as a catalyst for the development of Russian economy. Naukosphere. 2020; 10-1:147-151. EDN TCWNLG. (rus.).

6. Haaskjold H., Andersen B., Alexander J. Dissecting the project anatomy: Understanding the cost of managing construction projects. Production Planning & Control. 2021; 34(2):117-138. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2021.1891480

7. Abd El-Karim M.S.B.A., Mosa El Nawawy O.A., Abdel-Alim A.M. Identification and assessment of risk factors affecting construction projects. HBRC Journal. 2017; 13(2):202-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.05.001

8. Iskandarov D.Z., Borozdina S.M. Comparative analysis of an investment and construction project implementation in a special economic zone and in typical project conditions. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022; 1(90):158-164. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2022-19-1-158-164. EDN UFLFVU. (rus.).

9. Gainetdinov R.R. Features of the legal status of management companies operating in the special economic zones of Russia and in the Innovation Center “Skolkovo”. Modern Trends in Economics and Management: a new look. 2013; 20:223-228. EDN ROZDEL. (rus.).

10. Fish C.A. Land Acquisition for Special Economic Zones in India. Temple University Graduate Board. Philadelphia, 2011; 171. DOI: 10.34944/dspace/1202

11. Mirolyubova T.V., Koshcheev D.A. System spatial method for assessing an industrial cluster’s impact on the regional socioeconomic development. Journal of New Economy. 2022; 23(4):69-86. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-4-4. EDN PGYYUB. (rus.).

12. Bittencourt B., Zen А., Schmidt V., Wegner D. The orchestration process for emergence of clusters of innovation. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. 2018; 11(3):277-290. DOI: 10.1108/JSTPM-02-2018-0016

13. Namyślak B. Barriers to the development of creative clusters in Poland. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2020; 7(1):412-427. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2020.1814853

14. Gnevanov M.V. Advantages, opportunities and problems of enterprises of the investment-construction complex that operate on the territory of special economic zone (SEZ) of industrial type. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2017; 4:73-76. EDN YOQNGJ. (rus.).

15. Chulkov V.O. Infographic models of systemquants in the convergence of norms in their interaction. Bulletin of the International Academy of Sciences (Russian Section) (Electronic resource). 2012; 2:046-055. EDN ROMSIP. (rus.).

16. Andreeva I.A. Special economic zones: current state and efficiency. E-Scio. 2020; 6(45):493-501. EDN YPRSWA. (rus.).

17. Niyazbekova Sh.U., Nazarenko O.V., Bunevich K.G., Ivanova O.S. Special economic zones of Russia: analysis, problems and their solutions. Scientific Bulletin: finance, banks, investments. 2019; 2(47):213-222. EDN BPJTTH. (rus.).

18. Oruch T.A. Special economic zones of Russia: evaluation of efficiency of activity and practice of attracting investments. Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Мanagement. 2020; 11(2):49-55. DOI: 10.18287/2542-0461-2020-11-2-49-55. EDN NEJPVE. (rus.).

19. Yanova E.A., Valdaitceva M.V., Gribanova N.V. Special economic zones as an element of state innovation policy. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2019; 5-2:120-124. EDN ZKFDDF. (rus.).

20. Basenko A.M., Taranov P.V. Special economic zones as an institutional tool for mobilizing investment and financial potential of territorial development. Financial Research. 2016; 1(50):20-28. EDN WBCWMF. (rus.).

21. Naeem S., Waheed A., Khan M.N. Drivers and barriers for successful Special Economic Zones (SEZs): Case of SEZs under China Pakistan Economic Corridor. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4675. DOI: 10.3390/su12114675

22. Iskandarov D.Z., Borozdina S.M. The “one window” principle as a key advantage in the implementation of an investment and construction project in a special economic zone. The herald of Kyrgyz state university of construction, transport and architecture named after N. Isanov. 2021; 2(72):303-314. DOI: 10.35803/1694-5298.2021.2.303-314. EDN AEBKVQ. (rus.).

23. Mikhailova N.I. Analysis of external and internal factors of investment projects of the enterprise. Scientific Journal. 2020; 2(47):49-52. EDN WAHPYP. (rus.).

24. Liu W., Shi H.-B., Zhang Z., Tsai S.-B., Zhai Y., Chen Q., Wang J. The development evaluation of economic zones in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(1):56. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010056

25. Kostyleva V.I. Instruments for regulating externalities: comparative analysis. Vestnik of Rostov state University. 2018; 3(63):144-152. EDN YPMGIH. (rus.).

26. Epstein R.A. Positive and negative externalities in real estate development. Minnesota Law Review. 2018.

27. Wang X. The Role of Economic Development Zones in National Development Strategies: The Case of China : thesis … Doctor of Philosophy. Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, 2013; 139.

28. Vallejo H. Agent failures: A theory of internalities. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2023. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4381415

29. Mohajan D., Mohajan H. Profit maximization strategy in an industry: a sustainable procedure. Law and Economy. 2022; 1(3). DOI: 10.56397/le.2022.10.02

30. Lin L., Yuan G.X., Wang H., Xie J. The stochastic incentive effect of venture capital in partnership systems with the asymmetric bistable Cobb–Douglas utility. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2019; 66:109-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.06.010

31. Chatterjee S. A new coefficient of correlation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2021; 116(536):2009-2022. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1758115

32. Bavrina A.P., Borisov I.B. Modern rules of the application of correlation analysis. Medical Almanac. 2021; 3(68):70-79. EDN TPSSIX. (rus.).

33. Park B.U., Mammen E., Lee Y.K., Lee E.R. Varying coefficient regression models: a review and new developments. International Statistical Review. 2015; 83(1):36-64. DOI: 10.1111/insr.12029

34. Kowalski A.M. Towards an Asian model of clusters and cluster policy: The super cluster strategy. Journal of Competitiveness. 2020; 12(4):74-90. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2020.04.05

35. Komorowski M. Identifying industry clusters: a critical analysis of the most commonly used methods. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2020; 7(1):92-100. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2020.1733436