Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Blockchain transactions as a promising mechanism to ensure sustainable development of the construction complex under sanctions (by the example of the Russian economy)

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.6.1016-1030

Abstract

Introduction. Restrictions imposed by Western countries on the access of the Russian financial system to international clearing systems significantly complicate the development of economic sectors that are deeply integrated into international supply chains. Among them, it is necessary to single out the construction industry, which acts as a “locomotive” for the development of many other types of economic activity. This paper is devoted to the review of emerging macroeconomic effects in the context of leveling the risks of the growth dynamics of the construction industry of the Russian Federation within the framework of the transition of the national payment system to blockchain (DLT) in the context of solving the issue of import substitution. The subject of the study is the features of the prospects for sustainable development of the Russian economy in the context of adjusting the import of construction materials.

Materials and methods. The tools of building a system of recursive equations estimating macroeconomic externalities in the process of simulation modelling of blockchain use in the system of ensuring sustainable settlements with foreign counterparties, as well as correlation and regression analysis, which forms the basis for identifying the impact of the Russian construction industry on the prospects for GDP growth were applied.

Results. The short-term potential of possible slowdown of Russia’s GDP growth (–0.45 % per year) as part of the localization of import supplies of building materials. It is substantiated that the risks of limiting the supply of building materials can be ensured through the introduction of blockchain technologies into the system of cross-border payments of the Russian Federation, which form a new basis for the movement of cash flows.

Conclusions. The value of the obtained research results consists in the identified and empirically substantiated risks of slowing down the development of the construction industry and the national economy of the Russian Federation as a whole within the framework of possible localization of supplies of building materials from abroad as a result of sanctions pressure on financial markets. It is substantiated that the creation of regional blockchain platforms on a global scale can act as a tool for leveling risks, providing the possibility of stability and independence of the formation of transnational supply chains from global clearing services.

About the Authors

M. R. Safiullin
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (KFU); Center of Advanced Economic Research in the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan
Russian Federation

Marat R. Safiullin — Doctor of Economics Sciences, Professor, Vice-Rector for Economic and Strategic Development; Director

18 Kremlin st., Kazan, 420008, Republic of Tatarstan;
23/6 Karl Marx st., Kazan, 420111, Republic of Tatarstan

RISC AuthorID: 430501, Scopus: 55352002400, ResearcherID: E-1847-2016



L. A. Elshin
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (KFU); Center of Advanced Economic Research in the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan
Russian Federation

Leonid A. Elshin — Doctor of Economics Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Territorial Economics, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance; Head of the Department of Macro-Research and Economics of Growth;

18 Kremlin st., Kazan, 420008, Republic of Tatarstan;
23/6 Karl Marx st., Kazan, 420111, Republic of Tatarstan

RISC AuthorID: 318244, Scopus: 55775977700, ResearcherID: C-2801-2016



A. A. Dinmukhametova
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (KFU); Center of Advanced Economic Research in the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan; Kazan National Research Technological University (KNRTU)
Russian Federation

Aliya A. Dinmukhametova — Senior Researcher, Center for Strategic Estimates and Forecasts, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance; leading researcher; senior lecturer of the Department of Business Statistics and Economics

18 Kremlin st., Kazan, 420008, Republic of Tatarstan;
23/6 Karl Marx st., Kazan, 420111, Republic of Tatarstan;
68 K. Marksa st., Kazan, 420015, Republic of Tatarstan

RISC AuthorID: 948290, Scopus: 57205321991, ResearcherID: ABF-4413-2020



A. R. Sharapov
Volga Region State University of Physical Culture, Sports and Tourism
Russian Federation

Azat R. Sharapov — Doctor of Economics Sciences, Professor, First Vice-Rector

build. 35 territory Universiade Village, Kazan, 420010, Republic of Tatarstan

RISC AuthorID: 477890, Scopus: 57903186400



References

1. Masalskiy M.G. Economic sanctions. Impact of economic sanctions on the Russian Federation. Economy and Society. 2022; 4-3(95):95-97. EDN EUFDCQ. (rus.).

2. Osipov V.S., Zel’dner A. G., Pankova S.V., Novitskiy N.A., Popov V.V., Tsypin A.P. et al. Import substitution economy: impact assessment of structure of foreign trade commodity flows on development of economic potential and import substitution in the Russian Federation. Intelligence. Innovation. Investments. 2017; 7:31-44. EDN ZRBRTP. (rus.).

3. Bas M., Strauss-Kahn V. Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France. Review of World Economics. 2014; 150(2):241-275. DOI: 10.1007/s10290-013-0175-0

4. Stone S., Messent J., Flaig D. Emerging Policy Issues. OECD Trade Policy Papers. 2015. DOI: 10.1787/5js1m6v5qd5j-en

5. Zhang T., Huang Z. Blockchain and central bank digital currency. ICT Express. 2021; 8(2):264-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.icte.2021.09.014

6. Safiullin M.R., El’shin L.A., Prygunova M.I. Volatility and competitiveness of regions in the context of foreign policy and market changes (on the example of the regions of the Volga Federal District). Bulletin of the Russian Economic University named after G.V. Plekhanov. 2014; 12(78):115-127. EDN THNFEL. (rus.).

7. Elshin L.A. Comparative analysis of cyclic fluctuations of regional economic systems: modeling, identification, forecasting. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2017; 4:138-156. EDN ZDDBWP. (rus.).

8. Kochergin D.V. Central banks digital currencies: world experience. World Economy and International Relations. 2021; 65(5):68-77. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-5-68-77. EDN CUETEZ. (rus.).

9. Dubrovskaya E.S. The Russian economy under sanctions: current situation and prospects for innovative development. Creative Economy. 2022; 16(11):4553-4564. DOI: 10.18334/ce.16.11.116637. EDN FUKNXM. (rus.).

10. Sakharov D.M. Central bank digital currencies: key aspects and impact on the financial system. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2021; 25(5):133-149. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-5-133-149. EDN NCJJXC. (rus.).

11. Safiullin M.R., Savelichev M.V., Elshin L.A. Place and evolution of blockchain technology in the system of economic development. Science Review: Theory and Practice. 2019; 9(8):(64):1191-1200. DOI: 10.35679/2226-0226-2019-9-8-1191-1200. EDN RAEOJF. (rus.).

12. Sidorenko E. Digital currency of central banks: economic scenarios and forecasts. International Trends. 2021; 19(2):(65):151-165. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.2.65.8. EDN EAFGWE. (rus.).

13. Engert W., Fung B.S.C. Central bank digital currency: Motivations and implications. Bank of Canada Staff Discussion Paper. 2017. URL: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/sdp2017-16.pdf

14. Alonso S.L.N., Jorge-Vazquez J., Forradellas R.F.R. Central banks digital currency: Detection of optimal countries for the implementation of a CBDC and the implication for payment industry open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021; 7(1):72. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7010072

15. Allen D.W.E., Berg C., Davidson S., Novak M., Potts J. International policy coordination for blockchain supply chains. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. 2019; 6(3):367-380. DOI: 10.1002/app5.281

16. Ganne E., Patel D. Blockchain & DLT In Trade: A Reality Check, World Trade Organization (WTO) and Trade Finance Global (TFG). 2019.

17. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. How Blockchain Will Change Organizations. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2019; 58(2):10-13.

18. Boar C., Holden H., Wadsworth A. Impending arrival — a sequel to the survey on central bank digital currency. Bank for International Settlements. BIS Papers, 2020; 107. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap107.pdf

19. Boar C., Wehrli A. Ready, steady, go? Results of the third BIS survey on central bank digital currency. BIS Papers, 2021; 114. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap114.pdf

20. Allessie D., Sobolewski M., Vaccari L., Pignatelli F. Blockchain for digital government. JRC. 2019.

21. Glaser F., Hawlitschek F., Notheisen B. Blockchain as a Platform. Business Transformation through Blockchain. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2019; 121-143.


Review

For citations:


Safiullin M.R., Elshin L.A., Dinmukhametova A.A., Sharapov A.R. Blockchain transactions as a promising mechanism to ensure sustainable development of the construction complex under sanctions (by the example of the Russian economy). Vestnik MGSU. 2024;19(6):1016-1030. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2024.6.1016-1030

Views: 240


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)