Urban planning design as an intellectual basis of the territorial development management system

Introduction. The management of urban planning in Russia has been significantly transformed over the 20 years of the Urban Planning Code. On the one hand, vast experience has been accumulated, territorial planning and urban zoning have covered the entire country, on the other hand, an increasing number of documents give rise to new conflicts, decisions are often not synchronized and even contradictory. It is possible to improve the quality of management decisions by building goal-setting, formalizing the tasks of managing the development of territories and systemic transformation in the ways of making management decisions based on the results of urban planning design. The purpose of the paper is to substantiate and formulate arguments in favour of integrated urban planning as an intellectual basis for effective management of spatial changes in urbanized territories.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of a comparative analysis of complex urban development projects developed under the guidance of the author of the paper in cities of various regions of Russia and the impact of their decisions on the quality of management and the effectiveness of territorial development.

Results. The transformations of types of town-planning documentation were substantiated, their composition and content were determined in order to optimize management processes and improve the quality of decisions that ensure the achievement of the goal of integrated socio-economic and spatial development of territories due to the completeness, relevance and legal significance of data on the objects of town-planning planning and town-planning regulation — the results of town-planning design. Urban planning is an intellectual basis for making scientifically sound decisions on the spatial development of urbanized territories.

Conclusions. The field of urban planning is expanding significantly. To ensure systematic and effective management of the development of territories, five types of urban planning documentation are proposed, the results of which together will constitute the intellectual basis of the spatial development management system in the format of a digital information model for managing the development of territories: strategic plan; comprehensive infrastructure and investment plan; master plan for land use and development; master plan (strategic, sectoral or local); the project of planning and surveying the territory.

1. Reimer M., Getimis P., Blotevogel H. Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective on continuity and changes. London, Routledge, 2014; 336.

2. Mäntysalo R., Kangasoja J.K., Kanninen V. The paradox of strategic spatial planning: a theoretical outline with a view on Finland. Planning Theory & Practice. 2015; 16(2):169-183. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1016548

3. Hoidn B., Wang W. 21BB Model Region. Berlin Brandenburg. Zurich, 2020; 176.

4. Amin E., Trift N. Cities: rethinking urban. Moscow, Krasnaya lastochka Publ., 2017; 218. (rus.).

5. Lefebvre A. The production of space. Moscow, Strelka Press, 2015; 405. (rus.).

6. Ratti K., Claudel M. The City of Tomorrow. Sensors, networks, hackers and the future of urban life. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo instituta Gaydara, 2017; 248. (rus.).

7. Rybchinsky V. City designer. Ideas and cities. Moscow, Strelka Press, 2014; 250. (rus.).

8. Levy J.M. Modern urban planning. Moscow, Strelka Press, 2020; 389. (rus.).

9. Mikolait A., Purkhauer M. The area code. 100 observations that will help you understand the city. Moscow, 2020; 152. (rus.).

10. Vilner M.Ya. On the problems of the current system of regulation of urban planning activities in Russia. Management of Territory Development. 2019. (rus.).

11. Vilner M.Ya. Methodological foundations of the reform of territorial development management: monograph. Moscow, 2018; 115. (rus.).

12. Beregovskikh A.N., Stukaneva I.G., Starchenkova N.S., Makarova O.S. et al. General plan of Omsk. Omsk, 2021; 280. (rus.).

13. Kolontai A.N. If not a master plan, then what? Project Russia. 2021. (rus.).

14. Beregovskikh A.N. State and municipal management of territorial development: urban planning and spatial data. Urban Planning. 2022; 3-4(79-80):10-15. EDN UDVLQT. (rus.).

15. Beregovskikh A.N. CIPRR is a master plan that works every day. Fundamental, search and applied research of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences on scientific support for the development of architecture, urban planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2021. 2022; 177-187. (rus.).

16. Beregovskikh A.N. Development of regions and cities. Strategy – tactics – regulation – reconfiguration. Urban Planning. 2022; 1-2(77-78):32-38. EDN XCJTIT. (rus.).

17. Beregovskikh A.N. Improving the planning system for territory development. Goals and principles. Fundamental, exploratory and applied research of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences on scientific support for the development of architecture, urban planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2019. 2020; 144-150. EDN LNEYYR. (rus.).

18. Analysis of the latest international methodological experience in planning urban reconstruction (towards the methodology for developing a master plan for the city of Novouralsk) : collection of proceedings. V.L. Glazychev (ed.). Site in memory of V.L. Glazychev. (rus.).

19. Glazychev V.L., Egorov M.M., Ilyina T.V. et al. Urban environment. Development technology : handbook. Moscow, Ladya Publ., 1995; 240. (rus.).

20. Urban research and practice. Vol. 6, 3: Participatory design: experience and prospects for involving citizens in spatial development projects II / Ed.V. V. Anashvili. Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 2021; 100. (rus.).

21. Sanoff G. Participatory design. Practices of public participation in shaping the environment of large and small cities. Vologda, Project group 8, 2015; 169. (rus.).