Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Using natural pozzolana as an improvement of Portland cement to manufacture concrete with environmental properties (Green Concrete)

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.4.529-544

Abstract

Introduction. The construction industry is considered as one of the major causes of environmental degradation due to the use of traditional building materials such as cement. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop sustainable alternatives to produce eco-friendly concrete using natural unprocessed materials. While acknowledging the importance of cement in the urbanization of mankind, it should be noted that its widespread use undoubtedly contributes to global warming which threatens the environment worldwide due to carbon dioxide emissions when fossil fuels are used to melt the products used in its manufacture, which are a mixture of clay, water and lime to produce the main binding material i.e. clinker.

Materials and methods. The aim of the study is to investigate the possibility of replacing Portland cement with natural pozzolana according to replacement ratios ranging from 10 to 50 %, and to study the effect of this replacement on physical properties, the most important of which are thermal conductivity and mechanical properties represented by the resistance to simple pressure, taking into account the following factors: the use of recycled gravel as an alternative to natural gravel.

Results. The results showed that increasing the percentage of cement replacement with pozzolana increases the thermal resistance of concrete, since replacing cement with an equal mass of pozzolana results in a 5 % reduction in thermal conductivity. In addition, recycled aggregates have higher thermal resistance compared to natural aggregates even when 50 % of cement is replaced by ground pozzolan. An increase in resistance of more than 24 % is observed, and a decrease in the simple pressure resistance of the resulting concrete is acceptable if the replacement with pozzolana is less than 50 %.

Conclusions. The simple compressive strength values of cubic specimens exceed the minimum limits of international specifications for cement blocks, which allows the manufacture of cement blocks using secondary aggregates with the possibility of replacing cement with ground pozzolana according to different replacement ratios up to 50 %.

About the Authors

M. A. Wassouf
Tishreen University
Syrian Arab Republic

Moustafa Ali Wassouf — civil engineer of the Department of Construction Management, engineer, master's student of the Faculty of Civil Engineering

Latakia

ResearcherID: HSF-7867-2023



J. Y. Omran
Tishreen University
Syrian Arab Republic

Jamal Younis Omran — PhD in Construction Project Management Engineering, Professor, Dean of Faculty of Civil Engineering

Latakia

Scopus: 57194594127, ResearcherID: ABF-2210-2021



A. Kheirbek
Tishreen University
Syrian Arab Republic

Ali Kheirbek — PhD in Concrete Technology, Building Materials, Professor, Professor at the Faculty of Civil Engineering

Latakia



References

1. Popov K.N. Polymer and polymer cement concretes, solutions and mastics. Moscow, Higher School, 1987; 72. (rus.).

2. Osei D.Y., Jackson E.N. Compressive strength and workability of concrete using natural pozzolana as partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2012; 3(6):3658-3662.

3. Wang Y. Research on the Sustainability in Green Building. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 2022. DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.220405.231

4. Aabid A., Baig M. Sustainable Materials for Engineering Applications. Materials. 2023; 16(18):6085. DOI: 10.3390/ma16186085

5. Wang H., Cao C. On how to move from green building to green ecological city. Building Materials and Decoration. 2018; 35:83-84.

6. Omran D., Wassouf M. Using Building Information Modeling (BIM) to Study Building Orientation in Design for Greater Stability. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2024; 19(3):436-455. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2024.3.436-455 (rus.).

7. Zhang D., Wu W., Fang P. Research on the Development of Green Buildings in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 555(1):012095. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/555/1/012095

8. Yuan Q., Liu Z., Zheng K., Ma C. Chapter 3 — Portland cement concrete. Civil Engineering Materials. 2021.

9. Al-swaidani A.M. Natural pozzolana of micro and nano-size as cementitious additive: resistance of concrete/mortar to chloride and acid attack. Cogent Engineering. 2021; 8(1). DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2021.1996306

10. Al-Swaidani A.M. Use of micro and nano volcanic scoria in the concrete binder: Study of compressive strength, porosity and sulfate resistance. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2019; 11:e00294. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00294

11. Ekolu S.O., Hooton R.D., Thomas M.D.A. Studies on Ugandan Volcanic ash and Tuff. Proceedings from the International Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology. 2006; 75-83. DOI: 10.1016/B978-008045312-5/50009-1

12. Ali K., Aljubayli N. Study the Influence of Replacement the Aggregates of Mortar with Natural Pozzolana on its Fresh and Hardened Properties. Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies — Engineering Sciences Series. 2014.

13. Alsheyab M.A.T. Recycling of construction and demolition waste and its impact on climate change and sustainable development. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2022; 19(3):2129-2138. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03217-1

14. Menegaki M., Damigos D. A review on current situation and challenges of construction and demolition waste management. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2018; 13:8-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.010

15. Dahlbo H., Bachér J., Lähtinen K., Jouttijärvi T., Suoheimo P., Mattila T. et al. Construction and demolition waste management — a holistic evaluation of environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015; 10:333-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.073

16. Zhang L. Production of bricks from waste materials : a review. Construction and Building Materials. 2013; 47:643-655. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.043

17. Colorado H.A., Muñoz A., Monteiro S.N. Circular economy of construction and demolition waste: A case study of Colombia. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12):7225. DOI: 10.3390/su14127225

18. Ukrainskiy I.S., Mayorova L.P., Salikov D.A., Shevchuk A.S., Chainikov G.A. Reuse of concrete and brick scrap as aggregates. RUDN Journal of Ecology and Life Safety. 2023; 31(2):291-301. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2310-2023-31-2-291-301. EDN NENFHQ. (rus.).

19. Murtazaev S.A.Yu., Khadisov V.Kh., Khad-zhiev M.R. Use of ceramic brick scrap for producing lightweight ceramic concretes. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2014; 10:22-25. EDN SQVWOD. (rus.).

20. Ahmed A.A., Fedyuk R.S., Liseytsev Yu.L., Timokhin R.A., Murali G. Use of Iraq concrete scrap as filler and aggregate of heavyweight and lightweight concrete. Construction Materials and Products. 2020; 3(3):28-39. DOI: 10.34031/2618-7183-2020-3-3-28-39. EDN NKXOKJ. (rus.).


Review

For citations:


Wassouf M., Omran J., Kheirbek A. Using natural pozzolana as an improvement of Portland cement to manufacture concrete with environmental properties (Green Concrete). Vestnik MGSU. 2025;20(4):529-544. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2025.4.529-544

Views: 112


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)