Life cycle management of residential buildings and infrastructure facilities in projects of integrated development of territories

Introduction. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the strategy of integrated territorial development and the methodology of life cycle management of construction projects.

Materials and methods. To achieve the goal of the study, an analysis of scientific publications presented in the RSCI for the period from 2021 to 2025 was conducted.

Results. International and Russian experience in integrated territorial development was analyzed, the main promising technologies for managing the life cycle of construction projects in the context of digital transformation of the construction industry were identified, the relationship between integrated territorial development and life cycle management of residential buildings and infrastructure facilities was revealed.

Conclusions. The key aspects of the relationship between the integrated territorial development strategy and the life cycle management methodology for construction projects, among which the key ones are the need to ensure the integration of long-term territorial development planning taking into account the dynamically changing needs of society; maintaining a balance between the technological modernization of construction projects and preserving the key approaches to sustainable urban development; ensuring the continuity of the stages of design, construction and operation of construction projects in the context of sustainable development. The mechanisms and technologies have been identified, the integrated application of which will ensure the best synergy of the IDT and the LCM methodology, which include: the use of predictive analytics and the Internet of Things, digital twins, information modeling technologies, etc. In addition, within the framework of the implementation of integrated territorial development projects, such areas as providing the population with housing, jobs, social, road and engineering infrastructure are important. In this case, it is advisable to consider these aspects within the framework of three types of IDT: integrated development of residential development areas; integrated development of non-residential development; integrated development of undeveloped areas.

1. Kashiripoor M.M. Application of sustainable development concept to the urban structure. Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2023; 25(1):35-49. DOI: 10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-1-35-49. EDN ZKCOGX. (rus.).

2. Krutilova M., Naumov A., Strokova V. Life cycle low-carbon management system improvement of the integrated development of buildings. Construction and Architecture. 2023; 11(2):3. DOI: 10.29039/2308-0191-2023-11-2-3-3. EDN YMUZXY. (rus.).

3. Kirsanov A.R. Types of integrated development of territories. Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2021; 4(235):84-89. EDN ROZHUK. (rus.).

4. Kirsanov A.R. Integrated development of territories: from global plans to specific problems. Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2022; 11(254):35-42. EDN QBGXJK. (rus.).

5. Shibaeva N.A. Integrated development as the basis for economic growth and increasing the competitiveness of territories. Management in modern society: technologies of the future and mentoring : materials of the XXII International scientific and practical conference. 2024; 280-287. EDN ABDOJF. (rus.).

6. Shibaeva N.A., Katalnikova M.Al. Integrated development of rural territories as a basis for sustainable development of Russian regions. Drukerovskij vestnik. 2023; 2(52):185-192. DOI: 10.17213/2312-6469-2023-2-185-192. EDN GGLEBE. (rus.).

7. Chebakova A.A., Karelin D.V. Influence of building density parameters on the integrated development of urban areas. Proceedings of the Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (Sibstrin). 2021; 24(1/2):(79/80):69-75. DOI: 10.32683/1815-5987-2021-24-79/80-1/2-69-75. EDN GHSQPW. (rus.).

8. Smyslova O.Y., Nesterova N.N., Ivanova A.A., Yurova P.N. Integrated rural development: spatial, sectoral and digital transformation. EFO: Economics. Finance. Society. 2024; 1(9):4-14. DOI: 10.24412/2782-4845-2024-9-4-14. EDN JOMDKU. (rus.).

9. Slyusarev K.A. Use of digital technologies in architectural design (on the example of the implementation of activities of the state program “integrated development of rural areas”). Selected reports of the 69th University Scientific and Technical Conference of Students and Young Scientists. 2023; 536-540. EDN ZVLDKK. (rus.).

10. Lavrentieva I.V., Tuzov K.A. Possibility of using big data for indicators of the state program “integrated development of rural territories”. Bulletin of the Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University. 2021; 38(43):113-122. EDN YAZOEZ. (rus.).

11. Fedosov S.V., Fedoseev V.N., Zayceva I.A., Voronov V.A. Management of the life cycle of a construction facility steady state. Expert: Theory and Practice. 2023; 3(22):131-137. DOI: 10.51608/26867818_2023_3_131. EDN AHFIUN. (rus.).

12. Zhdanova M., Lapidus A. Life cycle requirement time optimization of a construction project. Construction and Architecture. 2024; 12(4):(45):6. DOI: 10.29039/2308-0191-2024-12-4-6-6. EDN CHIANO. (rus.).

13. Postnov K. Peculiarities of designing and using a digital twin of a design organization. Construction and Architecture. 2023; 11(4):23. DOI: 10.29039/2308-0191-2023-11-4-23-23. EDN DMWYAM. (rus.).

14. Safaryan G.B. The life cycle of a building object as part of the construction system. Construction Production. 2023; 2:62-65. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2023_2_62. EDN ZFDURO. (rus.).

15. Lapidus A.A., Fedosov S.V., Petrukhin A.B., Kenewei E. Digital information modeling BIM is one of the possibilities of construction objects life cycle management. Construction Production. 2023; 4:32-36. DOI: 10.54950/265853402023432. EDN AWXPGA. (rus.).

16. Ginzburg A.V., Adamtsevich L.A., Adamtsevich A.O. Construction industry and the Industry 4.0 concept : a review. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2021; 16(7):885-911. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2021.7.885-911. EDN NWPZGH. (rus.).

17. Eleftheriou V., Knieling J. The urban project of HafenCity. Today’s Urban and Traffic profile of the area. Executive summary of methodology and traffic research conducted in the region. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017; 24:73-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.070

18. Harding J. Observing inclusivity in a crowded London underground station using service design methods. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers — Municipal Engineer. 2024; 177(1):25-37. DOI: 10.1680/jmuen.23.00048

19. Roberts J., Simpson J., Murphy N., Paxman J. Construction engineering to transform the composite frame of YY London. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers — Civil Engineering. 2024; 177(4):187-196. DOI: 10.1680/jcien.24.00918

20. Doyle A. Urban resilience: the regeneration of the Dublin Docklands. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers — Urban Design and Planning. 2016; 169(4):175-184. DOI: 10.1680/jurdp.15.00038

21. Song Z., Cao M., Han T., Hickman R. Public transport accessibility and housing value uplift: Evidence from the Docklands light railway in London. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2019; 7(3):607-616. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2019.07.001

22. Ball R.J., Langdon N.J., Giles D.P. Impact of the Calder’s Wharf development on Docklands Light Railway tunnels, London, UK. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers — Geotechnical Engineering. 2021; 174(4):419-429. DOI: 10.1680/jgeen.20.00053

23. Kim Y., Choi M.J. Contracting-out public-private partnerships in mega-scale developments: The case of New Songdo City in Korea. Cities. 2018; 72:43-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.021

24. Yigitcanlar T., Han H., Kamruzzaman M., Ioppolo G., Sabatini-Marques J. The making of smart cities: Are Songdo, Masdar, Amsterdam, San Francisco and Brisbane the best we could build? Land Use Policy. 2019; 88:104187. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104187

25. Zhou Y. AI-driven digital circular economy with material and energy sustainability for industry 4.0. Energy and AI. 2025; 20:100508. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100508

26. Seraj M., Parvez M., Khan O., Yahya Z. Optimizing smart building energy management systems through industry 4.0: A response surface methodology approach. Green Technologies and Sustainability. 2024; 2(2):100079. DOI: 10.1016/j.grets.2024.100079

27. Bag S., Gupta S., Chan H.-L., Kumar A. Building smart product-service systems capabilities for circular supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2024; 188:103625. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103625

28. Jia W., Li S., Wang J., Lee J.T.E., Lin C.S.K., Mašek O. et al. Sustainable valorisation of food waste into engineered biochars for CO2 capture towards a circular economy. Green Chemistry. 2024; 26(4):1790-1805. DOI: 10.1039/d3gc04138g

29. Bosu I., Mahmoud H., Hassan H. Energy audit, techno-economic, and environmental assessment of integrating solar technologies for energy management in a university residential building: A case study. Applied Energy. 2023; 341:121141. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121141

30. Yin X., Liu H., Chen Y., Al-Hussein M. Building information modelling for off-site construction: Review and future directions. Automation in Construction. 2019; 101:72-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.010

31. Prashar A. A parametric optimization approach for radial shaft seal production processes for rubber waste reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023; 415:137770. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137770

32. Alijoyo F.A. AI-powered deep learning for sustainable industry 4.0 and internet of things: Enhancing energy management in smart buildings. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2024; 104:409-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.110