Scenario-oriented design of construction projects in integrated territorial development projects

Introduction. The aim of the paper is to develop a scenario-oriented approach to the design of construction projects in integrated territorial development projects.

Materials and methods. The scenario-oriented approach to designing construction projects in complex development of the territory (CDT) projects will be implemented through three key areas: integrated development of residential development areas; integrated development of non-residential development; integrated development of undeveloped areas. The basis for developing the CDT Project software module was the regulatory documentation in force in the Russian Federation.

Results. The software module “Project CDT” was developed for calculating the parameters of objects and the cost of projects according to three main scenarios, which takes into account regional cost coefficients, standards for building density, and regulatory requirements for social infrastructure. The resulting solution is saved in a detailed report in *.xlsx format. The developed software solution is flexible and can be adapted to any requirements and changes in regulatory documents.

Conclusions. The application of the presented approach will reduce the time for developing CDT projects considering the characteristics of the developed territory, and the proposed software module can be adapted to new regulatory requirements if necessary. At the same time, the traditional approach considers CDT objects as isolated elements, which violates the system engineering principles of emergence and hierarchy, which leads to the need to develop new approaches to assess the autonomy of construction objects in CDT projects. The development of a methodology for assessing autonomy will transfer the design of CDT to a fundamentally new level, in which the transition from isolated objects to synergetic complexes with dynamic modeling of their life cycle will be carried out. Further research by the authors will be devoted to this issue.

1. Eremina I.A., Polyanin A.V. Digitalization of complex regional development projects of territories. Natural-Humanitarian Studies. 2021; 33(1):90-95. DOI: 10.24412/2309-4788-2021-10838. EDN YIUMSD. (rus.).

2. Beliakov S.I. Mechanisms for the formation and development of the investment portfolio of organizations realizing in the integrated development of territories. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2023; S3:164-167. EDN BKEDCL. (rus.).

3. Mikhaleva N.V. Comprehensive development of the territory as a tool for implementing socio-economic development of a municipality (based on the example of the city of Taganrog). Modern trends and priorities for sustainable development of regions : proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023; 145-151. EDN NQIDCN. (rus.).

4. Malikov V.V. Innovations in the legal regulation of the complex development of the territory. Agrarian and Land Law. 2021; 9(201):40-43. DOI: 10.47643/1815-1329_2021_9_40. EDN VWJWEE. (rus.).

5. Sergunina N.A. Legal nature of the agreement on the integrated development of territory. Herald of the Russian Law Academy. 2019; 1:85-91. EDN VIYZEB. (rus.).

6. Drueva A.A. Integrated development of the territory: legal conditions for ensuring. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2022; 12(100):82-90. DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2022.100.12.082-090. EDN LSMGJP. (rus.).

7. Kirsanov A.R. Agreement on the integrated development of the territory: legal nature and essential conditions. Property relations in the Russian Federation. 2024; 7(274):8-18. EDN RGPKVK. (rus.).

8. Bryanskaya O.L. Implementation of the state program “comprehensive development of rural areas of the republic of Buryatia”. Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2023; 7(156):480-484. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2023.156.7.080. EDN ABJZCS. (rus.).

9. Shibaeva N.An., Katalnikova M.Al. Integrated development of rural territories as a basis for sustainable development of Russian regions. Drukerovskij vestnik. 2023; 2(52):185-192. DOI: 10.17213/2312-6469-2023-2-185-192. EDN GGLEBE. (rus.).

10. Leonov P.V., Kolotyrin K.P. Development of social infrastructure of rural areas using economic instruments of the integrated rural development program. Reports Scientific Society. 2024; 6(50):44-47. EDN UIUNFQ. (rus.).

11. Patrina E.N., Medvedeva L.N. Main directions of development of “green routes” in the system of integrated development of rural areas of the Volgograd region. Strategic guidelines for innovative development of the agro-industrial complex in modern economic conditions : materials of the international scientific and practical conference. 2016; 264-271. EDN WYRXDP. (rus.).

12. Adamtsevich L.A. Life cycle management of residential buildings and infrastructure facilities in projects of integrated development of territories. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2025; 20(6):957-966. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2025.6.957-966 (rus.).

13. Alla L., Alj B., Bentalha B. Utilizing Technology to Manage Territories. Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development. 2024. DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6854-1

14. Steward R., Chopin P., Verburg P.H. Impact-driven spatial planning for future-proofing small island states: A scenario-based land model analysis in Curaçao. Applied Geography. 2025; 178:103604. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103604

15. Feng D., Long H., Wang K., Jiang Y., Huang Y. Review and prospect of research on spatial layout optimization of rural settlements in China. Geographical Research. 2024; 43:2215-2232. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020240064

16. Deng M., Deng C. Data-Assisted Smart Territorial Spatial Planning Practice: A Case Study of Guangzhou. Tropical Geography. 2023; 43:2311-2320. DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003781

17. Suárez Roldan C., Méndez Giraldo G.A., López Santana E. Sustainable Development in Rural Territories within the Last Decade: A Review of the State of the Art. Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e17555. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17555

18. Chen K., Long H. The progress and prospects of land system optimization promoting rural development transformation. Geographical research. 2022; 41:2932-2945. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020210951

19. Reyes C.A.R., Muñoz-Quintero S.I., Acevedo-Charry O. Geotourism as a strategy of sustainable rural development of the Paipa — Iza volcanic complex in the eastern Andes of Colombia: An innovative approach. Turismo y Sociedad. 2022; 31:281-301. DOI: 10.18601/01207555.n31.13

20. Fattore C., Ermini R. Hydro-Morphological Analysis for Sustainable Planning: The Case Study of Matera, Italy. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. 2025; 237-242. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-76096-9_20

21. Chaudhry I.S. Viable system model: a tool for managing sustainable development holistically. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review. 2022; 1(1):50-65. DOI: 10.1108/MSAR-01-2022-0008