Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Influence of compliance of intramodular joints on the natural vibrations frequency of a modular building

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.10.1556-1562

Abstract

Introduction. The implementation of modular buildings leads to the necessity to develop methods of their calculation, including dynamic loads too. One of the main parameters in the calculation of loads from dynamic effects is the determination of natural frequencies of vibrations of the structure. The subject of research is the natural vibrational frequency of modular buildings. The aim of the research is to determine the effect of the compliance of intramodular joints on the vibrational frequencies of modular buildings.

Materials and methods. The paper deals with the determination of the first natural frequency of vibration of a modular building with semi-rigid intramodular joints, and the influence of the compliance of the joints on the frequency. The author of the paper proposed and substantiated an analytical formula for determining the natural vibration frequencies, taking into account the stiffness parameters of modular buildings and the rigidity of intramodular joints. The proposed formula has sufficient accuracy for engineering calculations. At the same time, it allows to analyze the natural vibrational frequencies of modular buildings with different parameters without constructing calculation schemes in computer systems, which significantly speeds up the search for rational design solutions.

Results. According to the obtained results, the discrepancy in the frequency values calculated by the finite element method and analytically for a one-story building with different ratios of the rotational stiffness of the joints does not exceed 1.5 %. For a multi-storey modular building, the difference in determining the natural vibration frequencies increases with the number of storeys, but does not exceed 10 % for three storeys.

Conclusions. Based on the example of a modular building, it is shown that it is necessary to take into account the joint rigidity to determine the correct value of natural vibrational frequencies. Ignoring of the rotational stiffness of the joints can lead to an error in determining the dynamic effects.

About the Author

V. S. Shirokov
Samara State Technical University (SSTU)
Russian Federation

Viacheslav S. Shirokov — senior lecturer of the Department of Metal and Wood Structures

244 Molodogvardeyskaya st., Samara, 443100

ID RSCI: 665300, ResearcherID: N-5278-2016



References

1. Shirokov V.S. Design features of modular buildings. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2022; 3. DOI: 10.15862/03SAVN322 (rus.).

2. Lacey A.W., Chen W., Hao H., Bi K. Effect of inter-module connection stiffness on structural response of a modular steel building subjected to wind and earthquake load. Engineering Structures. 2020; 213:110628. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110628

3. Lacey A.W., Chen W., Hao H., Bi K. Numerical study of the structural response to wind loading: modular building case study. 13th International Conference on Steel, Space and Composite Structures. 2018.

4. Lacey A.W., Chen W., Hao H., Bi K. Structural Response of Modular Buildings — An Overview. Journal of Building Engineering. 2018; 16:45-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.12.008

5. Annan C.D., Youssef M.A., El Naggar M.H. Seismic vulnerability assessment of modular steel buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2009; 13(8):1065-1088. DOI: 10.1080/13632460902933881

6. Fathieh A., Mercan O. Seismic evaluation of modular steel buildings. Engineering Structures. 2016; 122:83-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.054

7. Malo K.A., Abrahamsen R.B., Bjertnæs M.A. Some structural design issues of the 14-storey timber framed building “Treet” in Norway. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 2016; 74(3):407-424. DOI: 10.1007/s00107-016-1022-5

8. Choi K.-S., Lee H.-C., Kim H.-J. Influence of analytical models on the seismic response of modular structures. Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection. 2016; 20(2):74-85. DOI: 10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.2.074

9. Shirokov V.S., Kholopov I.S., Solovjev A.V. Determination of the frequency of natural vibrations of a modular building. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 153:655-661. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.218

10. Shirokov V.S., Alpatov V.Yu., Gordeyev E.A. Research into the stiffness of beam-column joints of modular prefabricated buildings. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2021; 16(1):20-29. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2021.1.20-29. EDN BTOSZA. (rus.).

11. Shirokov V.S., Gordeeva T.E. Research of joint connection rigidness of crossbar and column in a modular building. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2020; 6(83):90-96. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2020-17-6-90-96. EDN CCDCQT. (rus.).

12. Tusnina V.M., Kolyago A.A. To the issue of actual work of pliable nodes of steel frames of multistory buildings. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2018; 2:28-34. EDN YTCEAU. (rus.).

13. Tusnina V.M. Semi-rigid steel beam-to-column connections. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2017; 5(73):25-39. DOI: 10.18720/MCE.73.3 (rus.).

14. Rumin V.V. Analysis of rigidity of beam to column moment connections with high strength bolts. Modern Metal and Wood Building Structures. 2012; 16:216-223. (rus.).

15. Tusnina O.A., Danilov A.I. The stiffness of rigid joints of beam with hollow section column. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2016; 64(04):40-51. DOI: 10.5862/MCE.64.4

16. Bakshanskiy I.S., Zhabinskiy A.N. Influence of constructive features of bolt flange units on the distribution of internal forces in the transverse frame of a building. Problems of modern construction : materials of the International Scientific and Technical Conference: BNTU. 2019; 49-59. (rus.).

17. Tusnina V.M., Platonova V.D. Numerical analysis of the stiffness of the “beam-column” flange joints. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2020; 9:28-33. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2020.09.28-33. EDN ELLLJF. (rus.).

18. Bagautdinov R.I., Komarov Yu.P., Mostovskiy N.N., Daurov Z.S. Numerical model of beem-to-column joint finite stifness. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2019; 14(2):(125):179-187. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2019.2.179-187. EDN YXZHOH. (rus.).

19. Alpatov V.Yu., Lukin A.O., Saharov A.A. The study of rigidity of a steel column base assembly consisting of a support plate. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2015; 9:9-14. EDN UKFKDV. (rus.).

20. Choi K.-S., Kim H.-J. An analytical study on rotational capacity of beam-column joints in unit modular frames. International Journal of Civil, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering. 2015; 9(2):100-103.


Review

For citations:


Shirokov V.S. Influence of compliance of intramodular joints on the natural vibrations frequency of a modular building. Vestnik MGSU. 2023;18(10):1556-1562. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2023.10.1556-1562

Views: 263


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)