Optimization of technical customer functions when commissioning facilities using business process modelling tools
https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2026.2.269-279
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the need to improve the efficiency of the technical customer at the stage of commissioning a construction project. The previous research demonstrated the possibility of using a parametric neural network model to assess efficiency, but the problem of detailed regulation of management processes and a clear definition of the functions of the technical customer at various stages of the life cycle (LC) remains unresolved. Modern construction projects require the coordination of multiple participants under strict time and budget constraints, placing high demands on the quality of management decisions made by the technical customer during the preparation and commissioning of the project. Business analysis and process modelling methodologies help overcome this problem by systematizing and optimizing management processes, identifying bottlenecks and duplication of functions, and ensuring the timely commissioning of the project. While there are developments aimed at structuring individual stages of construction production, less attention is paid to the comprehensive description and optimization of the entire cycle of technical customer management decisions using modern digital transformation tools.
Materials and methods. System analysis, comparative analysis, synthesis, parametric modelling, and the analogy method were used.
Results. A detailed BPMN model of the management decision-making process was developed, identifying participant roles, decision points, and feedback loops for cyclical performance adjustments. Mechanisms for integrating the process model with a parametric neural network model and the ability to connect BIM data for automation were proposed.
Conclusions. The use of BPMN 2.0 reengineering methods systematizes the technical client’s activities, ensures process transparency, clear assignment of responsibilities, and the ability to regularly optimize through the implementation of corrective organizational proposals. Using management models as a basis for developing information systems helps bridge the gaps between process design and practical implementation. The integration of BPMN models with artificial neural networks and BIM systems opens up the prospect of fully automating control and regulatory processes in construction.
About the Authors
D. V. TopchiyRussian Federation
Dmitry V. Topchiy — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Structure Testing
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
I. V. Lavreniak
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Lavreniak — postgraduate student of the Department of Structure Testing
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Repin V.V. Modeling Business Processes in BPMN Notation. Part II. Practicum in BPMS Bizagi Digital Platform. Litres, 2021; 155. (rus.).
2. Luchkov V. Business Processes. How It Works. The Power of Linear Algorithms. Moscow, Filin, 2019; 240. (rus.).
3. Silver B. BPMN method and style. Aptos, Cody-Cassidy Press, 2011; 269.
4. Kuzmina T.K., Bolshakova P.V., Zueva D.D. Time simulation of procedures at the stage of preparing an object for construction. Building a basic organizational and management model. Engineering journal of Don. 2021; 5(77):414-423. EDN UMURSY. (rus.).
5. Kuzmina T.K., Babushkina D.D., Tikhomirova V.Yu., Valyaev A.I., Sukhorukov A.E. Modeling in BPMN and calculation of the duration of preparatory procedures for capital repairs of apartment buildings. Construction Production. 2024; 4:119-125. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2024_4_119. EDN TBUEOO. (rus.).
6. Tsay G.S., Staub-French S., Poirier É. BIM for facilities management: an investigation into the asset information delivery process and the associated challenges. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(19):9542. DOI: 10.3390/app12199542
7. Syed R.A.B., Agliata R., Mecca I., Mollo L. Semantic Web Technologies in Construction Facility Management: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Directions. Buildings. 2025; 15(21):3845. DOI: 10.3390/buildings15213845
8. Abanda F.H., Balu B., Adukpo S.E., Akintola A. Decoding ISO 19650 Through Process Modelling for Information Management and Stakeholder Communication in BIM. Buildings. 2025; 15(3):431. DOI: 10.3390/buildings15030431
9. Teixeira A.R., Ferreira J.V., Ramos A.L. Optimization of Business Processes Through BPM Methodology: A Case Study on Data Analysis and Performance Improvement. Information. 2024; 15(11):724. DOI: 10.3390/info15110724
10. Heidenwolf O., Antal K., Szabó I. Applying BPMN and Ontology to Measure Digital Maturity in Construction 4.0 — A Case Study. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2025. DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2025.707
11. Razilov R.R. Analysis and optimization of bu-siness processes in a construction company specializing in design and arrangement of winter gardens. Bulletin of the Moscow International Academy. 2022; 2:170-174. EDN GBUQXI. (rus.).
12. Fauth J., Bloch T., Soibelman L. PACE–BP: Process Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Building Permit Processes in a Global Perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2024; 40(5). DOI: 10.1061/jmenea.meeng-5958
13. Noardo F., Ellul C., Harrie L., Overland I., Shariat M., Ohori K.A. et al. Opportunities and challenges for GeoBIM in Europe: developing a building permits use-case to raise awareness and examine technical interoperability challenges. Journal of Spatial Science. 2019; 65(2):209-233. DOI: 10.1080/14498596.2019.1627253
14. Vysochina M.V., Fokina N.A. Using a process approach in investment and construction activities. Scientific Bulletin: Finance, Banking, Investment. 2024; 3(68):215-230. DOI: 10.29039/2312-5330-2024-3-215-230. EDN FUSNLW. (rus.).
15. Gardini A., Bragadin M.A., Naticchia B., Carbonari A., Corneli A. BPMN 2.0 Modelling for the Management of the Inspection of Execution Processes in Construction. Proceedings of the Creative Construction e-Conference 2020. 2020; 37-41. DOI: 10.3311/ccc2020-073
16. Topchiy D.V., Tokarskiy A.Ya., Lavrenyak I.V., Gazdarov A.A. Distribution of the main functions of the technical customer by stages of the object construction life cycle. Construction Production. 2024; 1:70-75. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2024_1_70. EDN PMOAXY. (rus.).
17. Topchiy D.V., Lavrenyak I.V. Stages of selecting an expert group to evaluate the functions of the technical customer when commissioning a facility. Construction Production. 2024; 4:112-118. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2024_4_112. EDN RMPWKJ. (rus.).
18. Kemaikin N.K., Pavlenkov M.N., Maeva L.S. The implementation of the process approach in the con-struction sector. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2022; 12(1-1):53-61. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2022.44.92.007. EDN GXAFDJ. (rus.).
19. Kulak O.D. Improving business processes in the design and construction of food processing plants. Science Bulletin. 2023; 3(6):(63):81-93. EDN YWSCLU. (rus.).
20. Lozhkin N.D. Topical issues of re-engineering business processes. Colloquium-Journal. 2020; 9-1(61):9-12. EDN MDGIFA. (rus.).
21. Sborshikov S.B., Maslova L.A. Reengineering of capital construction objects and reengineering of technological processes. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2019; 14(10):1321-1330. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2019.10.1321-1330. EDN PVOLNK. (rus.).
22. Novikova A.Yu., Kan E.N. Automation of BIM data updating processes-models of capital construction objects. Economics. Law. Innovations. 2024; 2:72-80. DOI: 10.17586/2713-1874-2024-2-72-80. EDN SYGOWC. (rus.).
23. Rzun I.G., Radin A.Yu., Balukhin V.Yu. BIM technologies as an object-oriented model of a construction object. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2024; 2(61):357-360. EDN RVJRQL. (rus.).
24. Kopylov A.D., Korolev A.V., Batishchev A.V. Digitalization of management processes in construction. Natural and Humanitarian Studies. 2023; 2(46):370-375. EDN YJEKYJ. (rus.).
25. Topchiy D.V., Lavrenyak I.V. Organizational proposals to improve the efficiency of the process of performing the functions of a technical customer during the commissioning of a facility. Construction Production. 2025; 3:27-31. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2025_3_27. EDN XPBHGG. (rus.).
26. Al-Siah H., Fioravanti A. BIM and BPMN 2.0 integration for interoperability challenge in construction industry. Technological Imagination in the Green and Digital Transition. 2023; 227-235. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-29515-7_21
27. Cao S., Sun H., Tong Z. BPMN-Based Building Project Lifecycle Analysis with a Core of BIM. CAAD Futures 2025 — Catalytic Interfaces Conference Proceedings. Vol.I. Hong Kong, The University of Hong Kong, 2025; 375-388.
Review
For citations:
Topchiy D.V., Lavreniak I.V. Optimization of technical customer functions when commissioning facilities using business process modelling tools. Vestnik MGSU. 2026;21(2):269-279. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2026.2.269-279
JATS XML










