Preview

Vestnik MGSU

Advanced search

Managing the life cycle of municipal infrastructure based on digital master planning

https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2026.2.280-293

Abstract

Introduction. The high depreciation of public infrastructure facilities is due to inefficient life cycle management, in particular outdated approaches to planning operational activities. This study aims to address the current fragmentation of information systems and the isolation of the operational process from other lifecycle stages. The research focuses on digital master planning as a tool for creating a unified digital platform to support decision-making at all stages of the utility infrastructure lifecycle. The study’s objectives included a comparative analysis of utility network maintenance management systems and the compilation of a list of key attributes necessary for creating a data register and crucial for predictive planning.

Materials and methods. The study is based on a systematic analysis of current regulatory documents and scientific publications in the field of digitalization of operational processes. Using a SWOT analysis method, a comprehensive study was conducted of the challenges, benefits, risks, and prospects of applying digital master planning for key stakeholders in the lifecycle stages. The paper proposes evaluating the effectiveness of a unified digital platform using a linear convolution method.

Results. system of criteria for multi-criteria evaluation of the effectiveness of digital master planning during the operational phase of utility infrastructure has been developed. flowchart for a unified digital platform for asset lifecycle management has been created, and recommendations for its implementation have been formulated.

Conclusions. The significance of the proposed unified digital platform lies in its ability to bridge the gap in the lifecycle management system for utility infrastructure. The proposed solution will systematize large streams of real-time data, expanding analytical capabilities and technical condition forecasting. This is expected to reduce the time it takes to identify and resolve operational issues, improve the reliability of utility infrastructure, reduce resource losses, and ensure their quality.

About the Authors

M. E. Dement’eva
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Marina E. Dement’eva — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Housing and Public Utilities

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

RSCI AuthorID: 309561, Scopus: 57194452801, ResearcherID: Q-3399-2017



A. S. Malkova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU); PRIMEKEY
Russian Federation

Anna S. Malkova — student; engineer of the Production and Technical Department

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
23 c1, 1st Tverskaya-Yamskaya st., Moscow, 125047

RSCI AuthorID: 1193372



References

1. Zajcev K.A. On the issue of preventing the trend of increasing wear and tear of utility networks in housing and communal services. International scientific and technical conference of young scientists of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov : conference proceedings. 2024; 67-72. EDN TNCFGP. (rus.).

2. Grabovyy P.G., Doan D.H., Nelyubov A.V. An organizational and economic mechanism for planning the development of systems that are part of the urban utility infrastructure. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2021; 3:41-47. DOI: 10.22337/2073-8412-2021-3-41-47. EDN AAYQWT.

3. León-Romero L.P., Aguilar-Fernández M., Luque-Sendra A., Zamora-Polo F., Francisco-Márquez M. Characterization of the information system integrated to the construction project management systems. Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e31886. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31886. EDN QNKGYR.

4. Evtushenko S.I., Kuzenko M.D. Use of augmented reality technology at the stages of the life cycle of a capital construction facility. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2023; 18(11):1813-1820. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2023.11.1813-1820. EDN IOBIMY. (rus.).

5. Che-Ghani N.Z., Myeda N.E., Ali A.S. Operations and Maintenance Cost for Stratified Buildings : а Critical Review. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2016; 66:00041. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20166600041

6. Dement’eva M. Integrated technique of planning the capital repair of residential buildings and objects of transport infrastructure. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017; 90:012052. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/90/1/012052

7. Krygin A. Evaluation of the Weibull distribution parameters for small volume of the sample in the problems of optimization of planning repair works on engineering networks. Large-Scale Systems Control. 2020; 84:177-197. DOI: 10.25728/ubs.2020.84.9. EDN LTPOYF. (rus.).

8. Antipova A., Eremina D., Shakirova T. The uniform information virtual space of construction organizations as an effective control of the construction process management. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018; 170:01005. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817001005

9. Kadysheva V.V., Stativa E.B. Issues of methodical approaches to accident rate of residential buildings determination in term of forensic construction-technical expertise. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2024; S3:232-236. EDN LUGQCX. (rus.).

10. Knyazeva N.V., Nazojkin E.A., Orekhov A.A. Modern approaches to assessing the technical condition of building structures at the operational stage. Construction: Science and Education. 2024; 14(3):131-142. DOI: 10.22227/2305-5502.2024.3.131-142. EDN XKJHFQ. (rus.).

11. Sergeeva A.Yu., Rusanov D.I., Myasishchev R.Yu., Sergeev Yu.D. Organizational and technological solutions for calculation of the risk of accidents and organization of safety control of the construction site. Construction and Real Estate. 2025; 2(17):41-46. EDN FFCSJB. (rus.).

12. Knedlová J., Bílek O., Sámek D., Chalupa P. Design and construction of an inspection robot for the sewage pipes. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2017; 121:01006. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201712101006

13. Dement’eva M.E.E., Pedyash E.V. E. Prospects of intellectualizing buildings in the course of housing reconstruction. Science Review. 2017; 20:167-170. EDN ZRNCQL. (rus.).

14. Emelyanov M.V. Development of perspective systems of monitoring of load-bearing structures of buildings and constructions. Construction: Science and Education. 2024; 14(4):123-131. DOI: 10.22227/2305-5502.2024.4.123-131. EDN ZXIAHP. (rus.).

15. Dement’eva M., Dement’eva A. Cartographic modeling for monitoring the technical condition of urban development objects. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018; 170:01079. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817001079

16. Shestov A.V., Famina N.V., Pavlova A.S., Kha-fizov K.V., Komzalov V.I. Digitalization of the housing and utilities sector in Russia: challenges and prospects. Construction Economics. 2025; 5:280-282. EDN JRYBXJ. (rus.).

17. Surkova L.E. GIS HCS: analytical capabilities of the open section of the system for educational purposes. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2024; 4:65-72. EDN VUXXIR.

18. Chesnokov A.S., Chesnokova E.A., Mukov-nin S.Yu., Kobova M.Yu. Improving the quality of housing and communal services using an automated information system. Construction and Real Estate. 2024; 2(15):179-184. EDN EFCJBV. (rus.).

19. Botareva E.A. Improvement of the industry of housing and utilities with the help of GIS HUS. Science of the 21st Century: Current Development Directions. 2022; 1-1:10-12. DOI: 10.46554/ScienceXXI-2022.03-1.1-pp.10. EDN ZMEUJR. (rus.).

20. Gvozdeva O., Tynysheva A., Shul’zhenko A., Starodubceva O. Digital master planning — new horizons in the management of urban areas. Moscow Economic Journal. 2025; 10(2):164-182. DOI: 10.55186/2413046X_2025_10_2_41. EDN RPNAYG. (rus.).

21. Beregovskikh A.N. Principles of formation of a digital information model for effective management of territorial development based on integrated urban planning. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2024; 16(4):10. EDN VXPVOD. (rus.).

22. Ovsyannikova M.N. The effectiveness of functioning of the construction complex based on the implementation of innovative solutions. Science of the XXI century: challenges, formation, development : collection of articles from the XXII International scientific and practical conference. 2025; 95-103. EDN NMFADR. (rus.).

23. Havin D.V., Gorbunov S.V., Bekker P.R. Economic aspects of competitiveness of enterprises in the construction industry taking into account the innovation potential. Innovations and Investments. 2019; 7:265-269. (rus.).

24. Gurinovich V.Yu. The comparative study of the development on prefabricated construction. Science and Technique. 2022; 21(5):397-409. DOI: 10.21122/2227-1031-2022-21-5-397-409. EDN AVHHFG. (rus.).

25. Alshraideh M., Engovatov I.A., Morozenko A.A. Structure and content of the NPP life cycle stage management platform. Construction: Science and Education. 2024; 14(2):18-31. DOI: 10.22227/2305-5502.2024.2.18-31. EDN SGNNHO. (rus.).

26. Dement’eva M.E. Planning of Operational and Technological Measures based on Logical and Graphical Modeling. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 988(5):052026. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/988/5/052026

27. Oleynik P.P. Main development trends organizations of construction production. Construction Production. 2022; 2:21-25. DOI: 10.54950/26585340_2022_2_21. EDN VEAEPD. (rus.).


Review

For citations:


Dement’eva M.E., Malkova A.S. Managing the life cycle of municipal infrastructure based on digital master planning. Vestnik MGSU. 2026;21(2):280-293. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2026.2.280-293

Views: 197

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-0935 (Print)
ISSN 2304-6600 (Online)